[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-09 Thread Jon Awbrey
Post : Systems Of Interpretation • 9 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/04/09/systems-of-interpretation-%e2%80%a2-9/ Date : April 9, 2016 at 10:30 pm Peircers, I had a feeling there was a deeper question embedded in Jerry's questions about order, and a nagging sense it had all come up several

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-07 Thread kirstima
Jon, list I do remember your three-dimensional visualization of sign relations, Jon. I had no intention of excluding you three-dimensional presentations. I appreciate your work, it just is not my cup of tea. My note to the list was NOT about sign relations, it was about understanding the

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-06 Thread Jon Awbrey
Kirsti, List, As far as visualizations of sign relations go, without worrying about their use as a calculus, I've already submitted on several occasions the following 3-dimensional example from a paper that Susan Awbrey and I presented at conference in 1999 and revised for publication in 2001.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-06 Thread Jon Awbrey
Gary, List, Surely you must understand that sign relations are special cases of triadic relations, namely those that satisfy a certain definition, and that triadic relations are special cases of relations in general. If Peirce's various logical algebras, calculi, formal systems, graphical

[PEIRCE-L] RE: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-06 Thread gnox
o:jawb...@att.net] > Sent: 5-Apr-16 18:00 To: <mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca> g...@gnusystems.ca; > 'Peirce List' > < <mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> Subject: > [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of > Interpretation > > > > On 4/5

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-06 Thread Jon Awbrey
-16 18:00 To: g...@gnusystems.ca; 'Peirce List' <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation On 4/5/2016 9:11 AM, <mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca> g...@gnusystems.ca wrote: By the way, since Jon’s diagram is nothing like an Existential Graph, > I

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-06 Thread gnox
e-l@list.iupui.edu> Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation On 4/5/2016 9:11 AM, <mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca> g...@gnusystems.ca wrote: > > By the way, since Jon’s diagram is nothing like an Existential Graph, > I > don't know why Jon refers to the central unit in it as

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation - Contrasting the diagrams of ammonia and the handedness of carbon compounds.

2016-04-06 Thread kirstima
erry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com] Sent: Tuesday, 05 April 2016 6:24 AM To: Peirce List Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation Jon, John: Thanks, Jon. The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpretations of CSP’s diagram of a chemical structure, ammo

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-05 Thread Jon Awbrey
On 4/5/2016 9:11 AM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote: > > By the way, since Jon’s diagram is nothing like an Existential Graph, > I don't know why Jon refers to the central unit in it as a “spot.” > Peirce uses that term only in the context of Existential Graphs, > which are also not diagrams of the

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-04 Thread John Collier
andler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 05 April 2016 6:24 AM > To: Peirce List > Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation > > Jon, John: > > Thanks, Jon. > > The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpretations of

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-04 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
Jon, John: Thanks, Jon. The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpretations of CSP’s diagram of a chemical structure, ammonia. (NH3) He showed it as a triad. The nitrogen atom was in the middle of the three hydrogens, each at the end of a spoke. NOT a triangle. But,

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-04 Thread John Collier
error. Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: Jon Awbrey <jawb...@att.net> Date: 2016/04/04 00:04 (GMT+02:00) To: Peirce List <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation Peircers, Questions about the meaning of the

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-04-03 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Questions about the meaning of the “central hub” in the “three-spoked” picture of an elementary sign relation have often come up, just recently among Jerry Chandler's questions and a question Mary Libertin asked on my blog. Maybe the answer I gave there can help to clear that up:

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-03-31 Thread Jon Awbrey
Post : Systems Of Interpretation • 5 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/31/systems-of-interpretation-%e2%80%a2-5/ Date : March 31, 2016 at 10:24 am Subthread: MB:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18534

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation

2016-03-30 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, I have written up blog editions of my first three posts on this thread, arising from questions about the meaning of various diagrams that are commonly used to convey the structures of sign relations. http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/28/systems-of-interpretation-%E2%80%A2-1/