-psych/transcending-the-matriarchy/
sj
*From:* Helmut Raulien [mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de http://h.raul...@gmx.de]
*Sent:* Wednesday, 1 July 2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Stephen Jarosek
*Cc:* 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture,
projection
*From:* Helmut Raulien [mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de http://h.raul...@gmx.de
]
*Sent:* Wednesday, 1 July 2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Stephen Jarosek
*Cc:* 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture,
projection
Thank you, Stephen! Now I
2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Stephen Jarosek
*Cc:* 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture,
projection
Thank you, Stephen! Now I see your point and have read it, and do not
feel offended. But I would say, that projection is something
it is... political correctness.
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2015 6:12 PM
To: Gary Richmond
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture, projection
Then the proper response is to ask the writer how she or he thinks
I enjoy all of the discussions and would prefer more broad than restrictive
frameworks. I consider restricting discussions as more technocratic tactic
/ approach and not Perice related in style.
Bev
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON
Agree about broad and do not think it is forced if the discussion can be
related to such broader matters as realism, triadic thinking, continuity,
fallibility, ethics, aesthetics, reality, signs, semiotics and so forth.
When it veers off is when buttons are pushed. I for example think the use
of
Maybe we could split the topic, and talk about primal nurturer and mammal instincts in the biosemiotics list, and about myths in a Peirce-related way in the Peirce list?
Best, Helmut
Stephen C. Rose stever...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree about broad and do not think it is forced if the
correctness.
*From:* Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com stever...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, 2 July 2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Gary Richmond
*Cc:* Peirce-L
*Subject:* Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture,
projection
Then the proper response is to ask the writer how
Helmut wrote: Maybe we could split the topic, and talk about primal
nurturer and mammal instincts in the biosemiotics list, and about myths in
a Peirce-related way in the Peirce list?
I like this idea very much.
Best,
Gary
[image: Gary Richmond]
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical
July 2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Stephen Jarosek
*Cc:* 'Peirce List'; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
*Subject:* Aw: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture,
projection
Thank you, Stephen! Now I see your point and have read it, and do not
feel offended. But I would say, that projection
for the objection (you
are under no obligation to), then please call it for what it is... political
correctness.
From: Stephen C. Rose [mailto:stever...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2015 6:12 PM
To: Gary Richmond
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] More on applying theory - culture
Bev, Gary, lists,
I agree with Bev, because Peirce's whole career was devoted to the study of
signs and Peirce-related is thus sign-related, it seems to me.
Besides, as I learned it from Peirce, we THINK, WRITE, and SPEAK in SIGNS,
and hence whatever we post on these lists should be regarded as
12 matches
Mail list logo
