Dear Howard, lists -
Den 22/09/2014 kl. 02.47 skrev Howard Pattee
hpat...@roadrunner.commailto:hpat...@roadrunner.com
:
But Howard, this is a different position than the one you presented in the
earlier quote just some lines before. There, each foundation of math was
legitimized by specific
Dear Jeff K, lists -
I merely reproduced P's argument for his hierarchy of sciences from memory
because it came up in the list discussion - it is not something playing a
prominent role in the argument of my book (apart from the issue of
(anti-)psychologism).
Best
F
Den 22/09/2014 kl. 06.50
Stefan, I haven’t read enough of the authors you cite (except Berger and
Luckmann) to answer this question, but I think that position would be an
extreme one even among social constructivists. That’s why I refer to Stan’s
argument as “radical” social constructivism, because he likes (or feels
On Sep 21, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Stephen C. Rose stever...@gmail.com
mailto:stever...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Which of Peirce’s writings contribute to the development and articulation
of his late value theory?
On Sep 21, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Gary Fuhrman g...@gnusystems.ca
mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
Clark, in reference to the Peirce passage you quoted about the “community of
quasi-minds”, you said that “While we could
On Sep 21, 2014, at 9:00 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Frederik Stjernfelt stj...@hum.ku.dk
mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk wrote:
My claim is certainly not that Husserl and Peirce agree in all respects. Just
that both of them unite objectivity with
On Sep 21, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Frederik Stjernfelt stj...@hum.ku.dk
mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk wrote:
To Peirce, the relation of similarity connecting a diagram to its real-world
object is not necessarily easy to grasp -
On Sep 21, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Frederik Stjernfelt stj...@hum.ku.dk
mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk wrote:
I am not sure complexity is enough, also because of the fact that we have no
agreed-upon measurement of the degree of
On Sep 21, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Clark Goble cl...@libertypages.com wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Benjamin Udell bud...@nyc.rr.com
mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
The main idea is not that of a long run. Instead the idea is that of
sufficient investigation. Call it 'sufficiently
As you say, Gary F, it's a trivial but interesting question on pronunciation.
I myself, to myself, pronounce 'dicent' as 'die-cent'; rather than 'decent' yet
also with the soft c. And 'dicisign' also with the soft c. My 'cultural norm'
(shades of Stan!) suggests a soft c after the vowels of
Re: Gary Fuhrman
At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14236
Gary, List,
Just by way of putting the skinny in the lead, I am going to experiment with
using the term dicent proposition to refer to the specifically Peircean brand
of proposition treated in this chapter
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin Udell bud...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 9/22/2014 12:15 PM, Bob Logan wrote:
Dear All - Sorry for the last posting I inadvertently sent it before I was
finished. What I wanted to say is this in response to John's request for
thoughts:
I would say
Frederik, lists,
I haven't spent much time of late studying the literature of contemporary
neuroscience in general and Barsalou's theory in particular. Since I'm away
from my desk until this evening, I thought I'd at least take a glance at
some of that literature before re-reading your section on
This is a beautiful post, Ben! You expose so clearly the pragmatic heft of
Peirce’s concept of truth.
Such considerations cry out to be presented to first-year philosophy
students, most of whom come in thinking that some kind of social
constructivism is the only educated or open-minded or
Dear Peirce List,
This is forwarded from Jean-Marie Chevalier. Looks very interesting!
Cheers, Cathy
*Call for PapersSpecial Issue of Perspectives on Science*
THEME:
*The Second Metaphysical Club and its Impact on the Development of American
Science and Philosophy*
GUEST EDITORS:
15 matches
Mail list logo
