On Sep 21, 2014, at 9:00 PM, Clark Goble <cl...@libertypages.com> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Frederik Stjernfelt <stj...@hum.ku.dk > <mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk>> wrote: > > My claim is certainly not that Husserl and Peirce agree in all respects. Just > that both of them unite objectivity with an intersubjective view of science. > Peirce certainly clearlyt sees the social character of the scientific > institution. But he thinks that despite social strife, science may succeed > given that it follows certain central norms (I discuss this a bit in the last > ch. of the book) - norms which are not relative to social groups, culture, > history, psychology and similar solvents. Yes, I’m more just being pedantic over what objectivity and intersubjectivity means contextually in each. Put an other way it works as a first order approximation but probably misleads if one goes much farther. (Which isn’t a bad thing - my background was physics so we were all about doing regular first order approximations to understand a phenomena)
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
