John FS; thanks for your comments. See mine below.
1] ET
I wish we could get into the analysis of time in more detail.
JFS: I came across a short passage by Gregory Bateson that clarifies the
issues. See the attached Bateson79.jpg, which is an excerpt from p. 2
of a book on
John, List:
My initial thought when I read your post was that your identification of
three different "kinds of time" might align nicely with the points of view
of the three Categories that Nicholas Guardiano adopted to analyze Peirce's
cosmogony in the paper that I linked yesterday in the thread
Jeff,
Topology is the most general study of geometric space. It is critical here to
get beyond the “popular” accounts and learn the basics from a real math book.
A classic introduction is General Topology by J.L. Kelley but there are lots of
equally good choices out there.
Jon
John Sowa, Jon Awbrey, Edwina, List,
I wanted to see if anyone have might suggestions for thinking about the analogy
between (1) mathematical models of the differentiation of spaces starting with
a vague continuum of undifferentiated dimensions and trending towards spaces
having determinate
Dear list:
From Aristotle, *Physics*:
“But we apprehend time only when we have marked motion, marking it by
‘before’ and ‘after’; and it is only when we have perceived ‘before’ and
‘after’ in motion that we say that time has elapsed.
Now we mark them by judging that A and B are different,
George Herbert Spencer? What was I thinking? I meant George Spencer Brown.
Edwina
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a
John FS; thanks for your comments. See mine below.
1] ET
I wish we could get into the analysis of time in more detail.
JFS: I came across a short passage by Gregory Bateson that clarifies the
issues. See the attached Bateson79.jpg, which is an excerpt from p. 2
of a book on
John, Edwina, List,
Sorry to be so brief again, but trying to understand inquiry
and semiosis in general as temporal processes is one of the
things that forced me to develop differential logic as an
extension of propositional logic, for which I naturally
turned to Peirce's logical graphs as a
Edwina, Kirsti, list,
ET
I wish we could get into the analysis of time in more detail.
I came across a short passage by Gregory Bateson that clarifies the
issues. See the attached Bateson79.jpg, which is an excerpt from p. 2
of a book on biosemiotics (see below). Following is the critical
