Do you consider Feynman and Bohr and Bell and other scientists who have
articulated both their areas of knowledge and ignorance online fakes? There
is a huge chasm (binary) between a material understanding (contra
Peirce for certain) and things that point to a sense of oneness, unity and
so forth.
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John - many thanks for the slides - they are excellent - The
introduction set is very easy to follow.
Edwina
On Sat 11/08/18 12:38 PM , John F Sowa s...@bestweb.net sent:
On 8/11/2018 11:25 AM, Helmut Raulien
Dear Stephen, List,
I completely agree. Maybe the question remains, whether "universal" means "primordial" or rather "ultimate", or both, but that is too theological and speculative, I guess, and trying to answer it would be futile.
Best,
helmut
11. August 2018 um 18:37 Uhr
"Stephen
I have no idea how the inner permutations work -- I address things to the
person I am addressing and Peirce list. If they do not get there I have no
idea why. Please feel free to reproduce whatever you want to reply to. I
never see anything I send to the list ever.
amazon.com/author/stephenrose
On 8/11/2018 11:25 AM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
But aren´t EGs _the_ proper tool for ontology?
...
Somebody else please say something.
Peirce and I would agree.
But the people who are working on ontology know very little
about EGs. I've been writing and lecturing about EGs for years,
especially
We live in time-space and we also accept logos. To do both allows for
confidence that ultimately matters are out of our hands. At the same time
we have a purpose here. I see that as inevitably social and so it makes a
difference whether for example the elections go one way or another. Either
way
Stephen C. R., List,
I agree with the action values. But aren´t EGs the proper tool for ontology? Because Ontology is about being, existence, what "is", but the term "is" is ambiguous, or polyguous, other than the "cut" of the EGs, which is well defined, and not culture- or taste-relative? I
EGs are an acquired taste like frogs legs and kale. Words that survive have
many permutations. I would never use myth to mean something not real or a
lie. But there we have it. We are in a very binary phase. But when we come
out of it we need to suggest that some things are ontological -- true
Stephen, Stephen, List,
I think it would be better, if in politics Peirce´s existential graphs would be applied. Then it would e.g. be clear, that if "liberal" is inside the cut, "fascist" , and "hammer and sickle" would be outside of it. Also quasi-fascists calling themselves liberals, and
