print("HAL?");
if(laugh == T){
print(";)");
}else{
print("+9000");
}
Am 29.09.17 um 09:41 schrieb Armando Sercovich:
a1 b2
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
John,
thank for your response. I believe you are seeing this from a very
different viewpoint. I am interested in the sociology and history of
knowledge. That's why i am thinking in a different diagram.
On 8/16/2017 6:29 PM, sb wrote:
in my opinion the diagram should contain two cycles
John,
in my opinion the diagram should contain two cycles. A "habit" cycle and
a "something unexpected happens" cyle. The diagram should also address
the fact, that the stock of knowledge changes with every turn on the
"something unexpected happens" cycle.
Maybe it would be even better to
That’s interesting. I was familiar with Derrida’s and of course Habermas but I
didn’t know there were others.
In Germany there were e.g. Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen von Kempski, Max Bense, his
wife Elisabeth Walther-Bense, the late Karl-Otto Apel, Klaus Oehler or Helmut
Pape.
Best,
Stefan
Am
and culture, life and form.
Gene Halton
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, sb <peirc...@semiotikon.de
<mailto:peirc...@semiotikon.de>> wrote:
John, Kirsti, List,
for those interested in the philosophy of stories and able to read
german i recommend:
*
for developing a way which works in interpreting law.
Very, very different methods are needed, that's for sure. 'Tradition'
for instance, acquiers a different meaning than with, for instance
ancient texts.
Cf CSP's notes on the 'hand of the sheriff' as excamples of secondness...
Best,
Kirsti
sb
topic himself.
>Plenty.
>
>Thanks for the information, anyway. Perhaps I'll look something up on
>the basis of your incentive.
>
>Best,
>
>Kirsti
>
>sb kirjoitti 15.11.2016 23:33:
>> John, Kirsti, List, for those interested in the philosophy of stories
>> and ab
n, and
> thought. In regard to feeling, Hume is in error, for he is committed
>to the view that vividness is an element of a sensequality. The
>three modes of separating the elements of a thought-object are
>precision, dissociation, and discrimination. Volition and purpos
does Peirce and Plato say is useful about *likeness*?
>
>Best,
>Jerry R
>
>On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:45 PM, sb <peirc...@semiotikon.de> wrote:
>
>> Jerry,
>>
>> i am not sureb whether your quote from "Four Consequences" is useful
>or
>> not
t;
>
>Here is how I see Peirce to have conceived of Aristotle:
>
>
>
>“Whether the form or the substratum is the essential nature of a
>physical
>object is not yet clear. But that the principles are three, and in what
>sense, and the way in which each is a principle, is c
Gary, Clark, List,
"Stefan thought we might consider looking at Aristotle's views of democracy in
approaching Peirce's. I expressed some considerable reservations about that
approach."
Hope my intention became clearer by my previous post.
"I’d imagine the interesting question regarding
f that concept.
>
>Best,
>
>Gary R
>
>
>[image: Gary Richmond]
>
>*Gary Richmond*
>*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
>*Communication Studies*
>*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
>*C 745*
>*718 482-5690 <718%20482-5690>*
>
>On
College of the City University of New York*
*C 745*
*718 482-5690 <tel:718%20482-5690>*
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:06 PM, sb <peirc...@semiotikon.de
<mailto:peirc...@semiotikon.de>> wrote:
Gary, Clark, List,
You may recall that I concluded my message which began t
Gary, Clark, List,
You may recall that I concluded my message which began this thread
with this question: can anyone on the list offer some Peirce
quotations which might help quickly clarify his views on democracy?
when i search the CP for "democra" there are only three hits. Just
because of
Gary, Clark, List,
You may recall that I concluded my message which began this thread
with this question: can anyone on the list offer some Peirce
quotations which might help quickly clarify his views on democracy?
when i search the CP for "democra" there are only three hits. Just
because of
o
learn more from, not dismiss.
Best, Mike
On 11/19/2016 11:53 PM, sb wrote:
Edwina,
oh, this is a Peirce list, that's interesting, isn't it? What kind of
red hering is this? You keep writing this stuff on this list for
years over and over again. Now, when someone asks you for some
eviden
opment of the middle class
>market economy in the West. [J.D. Bernal, Ferdinand Braudel..]
>
>Edwina
> - Original Message -
> From: sb
> To: Gary Richmond ; Peirce-L
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Democracy
ible; there are no falsifying assumptions.
>It's pure description of 'the ecological realities and the societal
>forms of actual peoples. Then, one can generalize. And it's interesting
>to see how peoples - completely out of touch with each other - have
>nevertheless developed the SAM
John, Kirsti, List,
for those interested in the philosophy of stories and able to read
german i recommend:
* Wilhelm Schapp (2012) In Geschichten verstrickt. Zu Sein von Mensch
und Ding. 5. ed. Klostermann.
* Wilhelm Schapp (1981) Philosophie der Geschichten. 2. ed. Klostermann.
His
Jon,
just a funny sidenote:
Thomas Telford founder and lifelong president of the Institution of
Civil Engineers denied, according to Karl Polanyi, all phycicists
membership in the institution, because physics was at that time only
theoretical and of no practical use ;)
Something many
e
>because
>of social principles. That is, we might simply get bored after we deem
>no
>more information is worth having; that we have reached the limit of
>measurement and construction.
>
>
>
>With best wishes,
>Jerry Rhee
>
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:58 A
h Carl Sagan and the more
>recent one with Neil deGrasse Tyson.
>
>
>
>gary
>
>
>
>From: sb [mailto:peirc...@semiotikon.de]
>Sent: 14-Jul-16 05:29
>
>
>
>
>
>Gary F.,
>
>yes i agree, Peirce reading of the history of science is based on the
>i
. Also, many of the hypotheses which
>the early moderns tried to test were indeed derived from prior sources,
>so they certainly didn’t “start from scratch” in that sense either. And
>I’d concur with your observations about the current “sociological
>phenomenon” of “science.”
>
&
Gary, John, Olga,
what is this thing "science" you are talking about? Do you mean the
sociological phenomen or the idea of science? I think these two are a bit mixed
up in your exchange. When i look at science as a sociological phenomenen i must
say i have seen much hedonism, betrayal, lying,
ngually" (as in
>composing at the piano or choreographing a dance, which presupposes
>linguistic competence but is not itself an exercise of speech)."
>
>
>Matt
>
>
>On 10/12/15 6:14 PM, sb wrote:
>> Matt, Clark,
>>
>> thanks for your interesting excha
Matt, Clark,
thanks for your interesting exchange!
I have only two points. 1) I found the language fetishism of some social
scientists and philosophers always strange. I personally am thinking in images
and diagrams and that's why i was exited about Peirce whenni started reading
him.
for those who might be
interested in it there.
Best,
Gary
Gary Richmond*
*
*
*
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
*C 745*
*718 482-5690*
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:04 PM, sb peirc...@semiotikon.de
Lieber Helmut,
Was du ererbt von deinen Vätern hast,
erwirb es, um es zu besitzen.
Was man nicht nützt, ist eine schwere Last;
Nur was der Augenblick erschafft, das kann er nützen.
Es geht doch nicht darum Dinge zu glauben, weil sie alt sind, es geht darum aus
der Etymologie eines Wortes etwas
converging from various
starting points (and zigzagging too) till things fit together like in
a crossword puzzle, as Haack said.
Best, Ben
On 9/24/2014 8:36 AM, sb wrote:
Ben, Gary, R., Gary F.,
i've got to start from the end of your post. You speak of the society
rewarding diciplines
26, 2014 at 5:52 AM, sb peirc...@semiotikon.de
mailto:peirc...@semiotikon.de wrote:
Ben, Garys, list,
seems i took some things down the wrong pipe (see my post to
Gary). There is not much in what you say that I'd disagree with.
But there is still the truth-problem, but maybe
/23/2014 5:20 AM, sb wrote:
Gary F., Ben, List,
yes, it is an extremist position. Ludwik Fleck in some of his texts
about the /Denkkollektive/ (thought collectives) comes close to this
point. But his microbiological bench research maybe prevented him to
fall prey to such solipcism. Also Latours
Dear Ben, Gary R., Gary F., List
wich social constructivists with some reputation do hold the position
that the objects or findings of inquiry are unreal and mere figments?
Schütz, Berger Luckmann, Piaget, von Foerster, Latour, Bloor or
Knorr-Cetina? Foucault, Mannheim or Fleck? I wonder
List,
last year i had a short exchange with Vinicius about a database
containing all the bibliographic info for the ms, letters, published
works and the crossreferences to the CP, W and the online material. I
talked big then and said the coding could be only hours or a couple of
days work. I
33 matches
Mail list logo
