Gary F - Nope - I don't think that you have effectively brushed the crumbs of
Edwina off your hands and can go on your merry way. [There! I told her off
didn't I. So much for her!] Why are you always so angry?
Icons don't commit themselves to any information or meaning - how can they -
but
Gary F., Edwina, Lists,
I find myself agreeing with both sides in this disagreement. Am I confused?
Icons themselves involve connectivity and thus continuity because a qualisign
may be connected to a token figure and a rule for interpreting those
connections--and not yet have the kind of
...@lists.ut.ee; 'Peirce List'
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment (was: Natural
Propositions, Chapter 3.6)
Gary F., Edwina, Lists,
I find myself agreeing with both sides in this disagreement. Am I confused?
Icons themselves involve connectivity and thus continuity
for your input.
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Brian Downard jeffrey.down...@nau.edu
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; 'Peirce List' PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment (was: Natural
- Original Message - From: Jeffrey Brian Downard jeffrey.down...@nau.edu
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; Peirce List PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment (was: Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.6)
Gary F
*Cc:* Peirce List PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu
*Sent:* Saturday, October 04, 2014 5:16 PM
*Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment (was:
Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.6)
I'm confused.
ET: my understanding of the 'icon' in that it is not a Sign, even
though many seem
Dear Stephen,
Rest assured that you are not confused.
I am afraid it is Edwina who seems confused about the meaning of an icon
that has dual meanings -- (i) one of the three relations between the
representamen and its object, which is the only meaning of 'icon' to her,
and (ii) the name of that
, October 04, 2014 4:22 PM
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment (was: Natural
Propositions, Chapter 3.6)
Gary F., Edwina, Lists,
I find myself agreeing with both sides in this disagreement. Am I confused?
Icons themselves involve connectivity and thus
And what makes a difference as always as that practical effect which is at
the end of every consideration. Or did he not say that too?
*@stephencrose https://twitter.com/stephencrose*
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Sungchul Ji s...@rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
Dear Stephen,
Rest assured that you
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 6:15 PM
Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:7077] iconic commitment
(was: Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.6)
I suspect, that in this quote Peirce meant sign for representamen,
and by writing whether they be... he
List, Stephen:
On Oct 4, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Stephen C. Rose wrote:
in essence engage in a form of hermeneutics.
Consider the triadic triad:
It contains nine terms.
Five of these nine terms were of CSP coinage. CSP and CSP alone understands
why the majority of these nines terms were
11 matches
Mail list logo
