Thank you for posting your thoughts on this, Michael!
How does the concept of style which you elaborate below relate to Peirce's
distinction of 'tone' from 'token' and 'type'?
Cheers, Cathy
-Original Message-
From: C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] On
Gary R wrote:
*
For my own part, I tend--as perhaps Jon does as well--to see
esthetic/ethics/logic as semeiotic as being in genuine tricategorial
relation so that they *inform* each other in interesting ways. Trichotomic
vector theory, then, does not demand that one necessarily always follow
the
, compatible
with the structures they affect, and, in the form of heredity and
otherwise, gradually replaces the spontaneous energy that sustains them.”
Gene Halton
*From:* C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] *On
Behalf Of *Catherine Legg
*Sent:* Sunday, March 25
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Gary Richmond gary.richm...@gmail.comwrote:
I want to conclude this note with a passage near the end of the book
which I very much liked and have been reflecting on since. Forster
writes:
On [Peirce's] view, human beings are not cogs in a vast cosmic
Michael I just read the book review from Nathan Houser you shared - it is
lucidly written over 6 pages and gives a commanding overview of Peirce's
realism. I really enjoyed reading it, thanks for posting it.
Cathy
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Michael DeLaurentis
michael...@comcast.netwrote:
--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science Engineering
http://iase.info
On Mar 5, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Catherine Legg wrote:
Hi Steven,
I'm afraid I must join my voice to those who feel they would not pick
up the book based on your blurb
@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU] On
Behalf Of Catherine Legg
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 6:03 PM
To: PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Categorical Aspects of Abduction, Deduction,
Induction
Phyllis I also want to say how nice it is to have you back on the list!
The research
Read a paper the other day which I really enjoyed and wanted to share the
reference here:
*Danielle Macbeth, Varieties of Analytic Pragmatism, Philosophia 40
(1):27-39.*
*http://philpapers.org/rec/MACVOA*
Basically Macbeth dissects the version of pragmatism put forward by Robert
Brandom in his
Phyllis I also want to say how nice it is to have you back on the list!
The research into the three types of problem-solving which you outline
below is fascinating. Would you like to say a little more about how
you derived these results - you seem to have experimented with live
human subjects,
Dear Jason,
I've published a paper which distinguishes between 'universals' as
discussed in contemporary Australian metaphysics (most particularly in
the work of D.M. Armstrong), and 'generals' as discussed by Peirce.
Here is the abstract:
This paper contrasts the scholastic realists of David
that correction of my categorial assignments.
As Peirce notes near the end of the Additament to the Neglected
Argument, hypothetic abstraction concerns itself with that which
necessarily would be *if* certain conditions were established
(EP2:450).
Best,
Gary
On 2/21/12, Catherine Legg cl
of PEIRCE-L; in
particular:
Catherine Legg, The Hardness of the Iconic Must: Can Peirce's
Existential Graphs Assist Modal Epistemology?, pp. 1-24
Philip Catton Clemency Montelle, To Diagram, to Demonstrate: To Do,
To See, and to Judge in Greek Geometry, pp. 25-27
[the title alone of this one puts
- Original Message -
*From:* Catherine Legg
*To:* PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:19 AM
*Subject:* [peirce-l] Call for papers: Special Issue of the Transactions:
Joseph Ransdell and His Legacy
Dear Peirceans,
Hello again! I don’t know whether this list
to this list.
Stand by...
Yours,
Cathy
Catherine Legg
Senior Lecturer, Philosophy Programme
University of Waikato
Private Bag 3105
3240, Hamilton, New Zealand
http://waikato.academia.edu/CathyLegg
-Original Message-
From: C S Peirce discussion list [mailto:PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
14 matches
Mail list logo
