Thank you a lot! Reading this great text just now.
I got some general question again. Which has to do with some Aristotle
notion. I am just wondering whether CS Peirce also used this notion or wrote
some texts that are strongly connected with this notion. I am talking here
about the notion of "ph
http://www.chass.toronto.edu/french/as-sa/ASSA-No10/No10-A2.html
I just found this article on the internet when looking for more info on
Rheme. To me it is an excellent article. Might be worthwhile to read for
other people here.
Kind regards,
Wilfred
--
No virus found in this outgoing message
Hello,
Sorry but where on the net can those abstracts and
papers from the Salzburg
conferences be found?
Kind regards,
Wilfred Berendsen
Van: Jerry LR
Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 15 juli 2006
19:35
Aan: Peirce
Discussion Forum
Onderwerp:
Title: [peirce-l] Re: Sinsign, Legisign, Qualisign - help!
Dear everybody,.
Does someone here on the list happen to know this
George Soros? I already knew his name and interests, and would like to get in
touch with this guy. Any contacts might help.
Kind regards,
Wilfred
Dear list,
I am currently reading the text “peirce’s
logic of vagueness” of Phillys Chiasson. This text I regard as excellent,
also because the logic of vagueness of CS Peirce intrigues me a lot. Would like
to know where I can find this logic of vagueness in Peirce’s own texts.
What
I regard this kind of
discussions very interesting and practical. It are the kind of discussions that
motivated me to get into science and reading a lot of intellectual texts. While
I was, and even am, one of the most sceptical persons about both science and scientist.
Think that mainly has
Is it not the case that even
notions of left and right in a triadic Peirce relation require the
consideration of a multiple relation of multiple directions? I mean, even if
the left and the right are set (like A-B) and (B--A) in the example
below, there are still many more X’s (si
I am now on the net
looking for sources for notion of vagueness connected with CS Peirce. By doing
so, I also found some books on Amazon by Floyd Merrel. My question is whether
this guy is scientist or more like independent scholar. And I am actually
wondering whether he is on this list?? I
Benjamin,
In the discourse below, I think the cause of your problems in reasoning are
at least partly caused by misinterpretation of the qualisigns and further
aspects of the sign you are talking about at that moment. Well actually that
seems to be a logical conclusion, but I just want to say...th
see what I can find out about the prospects and let you know what I
> find out soon.
>
> Joe Ransdell
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Peirce Discussion Forum"
> Sent: Saturday, June 17
of these and other things as well, but it requires money even to
get a start on doing all of this.
As I said, let us know if you know where to get it.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: "Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peirce Discussion Forum
sive intellectual work. There are plans afoot for
doing all of these and other things as well, but it requires money even to
get a start on doing all of this.
As I said, let us know if you know where to get it.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: "Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen&q
Ok..so...are these actual original notes of Peirce to be found at Harvard?
And can they be reviewed by scholars? If so I would be interested to go
there maybe some time and review it. Better to have seen it first hand.
Peirce is getting my attention more and more :-)
Is there actually some good ov
So, actually, the photocopies we have now are
actually photocopies of photocopies? And, are the originals at Harvard or so?
I am just wondering whether anyone situated near
enough to the source for the most original papers of Peirce still available
somewhere ( I guess the originals will be
Title: [peirce-l] Re: Sinsign, Legisign, Qualisign
List,
I did not know the Digital
Peirce online site before. But am now reading some article there which I regard
very good. And it is just the first article I am reading. Would advice people
here who did not see the site before to certa
Well...just make sure not pushing any button but just choosing some number
first with the drop down menu. By pointing with your mouse on the arrow at
the right of the number (specify the number of trichotomies). Then choose
"ok".
Worked for me :-)
Wilfred
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jo
So why would the word “red” be a
symbol??? To me it is also not. I would regard the word “red” more
as being a qualisign, which then would also fit the last sentence below. To me
the word “red” can not be a sinsign since it is not an actual
existing thing or event. And to me a quality (like
List,
Besides the notions
of sinsign, qualisign and legisign, I am also very interested in the notions of
diagrammatic and dialogic. I have been reflecting on these notions for a while
now, but actually think I need to know more about their true meanings. I am
wondering whether the noti
Dear list,
Currently I am very interested in the notions of
sinsign, legisign and qualisign. I know there have been discussions about this
before, with phrases out of texts from CS Peirce defining these terms. What I however
would like to know, is in what texts (preferably from the esse
Dear Cassiano, list,
I regard the below message as very interesting. Cassiano,
your English is definitely not poor. And for me it adds for sure to the
understanding of the very interesting notion of Entelechy. Which I also regard
a very interesting subject. But, till now I only know the
Joe, Gary, Neal,
Thanx a lot for this info. It is for now very sufficient also because I
myself also thought that perfection of being belongs to the notion of
entelechy according to Peirce. The passages stated also really help me
because they prove that.
Would be interested however in more insig
Dear list,
I am currently writing my PhD thesis and want to use the concept of
"entelechy" in it. But, for doing so, I would be interested whether Peirce
might have defined this term in other sources than the Century Dictionary
(where I got it from). If so, I would be very interested in sources.
Sorry I was too early asking about diagrammatic...just did some google
search on Peirce and diagrammatic..enough to read for now
Wilfred
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Date: 30-3-2006
---
Mess
Dear list,
Some request from me again...fact is that I am getting some great insights
at the moment, but need to have some better understanding from the term
"diagrammatic" as stated by CS Peirce.
What I want to truly understand is what he meant by this term. For that I
need to know where to find
Dear list,
The post above interests me a lot! Maybe also because I construct the
notions in other ways now because I did not read much of Peirce still ;-).
Questions I am thinking about now:
- sinsign and legisign, connection with thoughts and "real" world and
objects "around" us.
- can there b
Dear list,
Just now I was thinking about some passages of
Peirce. About some small sentences which for me appeared to be quite important
somehow. For me they are now, whatever the answers to my questions I have to
ask here now. The questions relate to the term “diagrammatic” of C.S. Pe
Maybe I am wrong but according to my interpretations the difference between
sinsign , legisign and qualisign is perfectly clear after reading the great
post of below. There is mentioned there somewhere : the symptom itself is a
legisign, a general type of a definite character. The occurrence in a
p
Dear list,
I have some relevant questions that I am wondering
about to the people on this list.
The question are the following:
1) How
many people on this list actually heard of the name Alfred Korzybski?
2) How
many people actually really read his book “science and sanit
Thomas,
I am very curious about what you come up with for sure! Of course.
But, another thing...I am wondering what you are doing for a living
actually? Being a cook, cooking for people in a restaurant?? And that is
(about) fulltime?
I myself am actually working in a backery right now for living
Hello,
I just want to mention to the people being on this list that I opened some
new forum on the internet. The website concerned is www.nanomanagement.info.
Aim for this site is to get people with high knowledge on social sciences
and/or relevant people from practice (managers/CEO's) together to
Well actually I regard Derrida as excellent exactly because he is focusing
almost solely on language and ideas/mind. It is not clear to me however why
this would not belong to the linguistic turn in philosophy. Is linguistic
turn not "just" some terminology to describe emphasis on language by
philo
Also, while it is clear that no sign actually functions as such in the
absence of interpretation, the question of whether an *interpreter* is
required may be the kind of metaphysical question that Peirce declines to
enter into in this essay (EP2, 314).
gary F.
well the above sentence
Just some question. Can anybody maybe send me the Peirce notions of mediacy
and immediacy and direct versus indirect the texts I mean. Or where I can
find them. I searched in the dictionary but get some files I can not open.
If anyone can send them offlist to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would appreci
EP2.
Sincerely,
Creath Thorne
Drs.W.T.M. Berendsen writes:
> Some short reply. To set things straight, I am not a Dr. My title is Drs,
it
> is for completing my university studies. I might get the other one in
about
> 2 months, but do not have the right to use that one yet. I am sure
Some short reply. To set
things straight, I am not a Dr. My title is Drs, it is for completing my
university studies. I might get the other one in about 2 months, but do not
have the right to use that one yet. I am sure signs can not operate, even not
exist, without living beings. To create
Hello all,
As I enlisted here some week ago or so and also made some posting today, I
will now also give some short introduction about myself.
So, I am Dutch. 32 years old. Have followed some long education, mainly in
management. Specialism first in logistics, bachelor level. Then I entered
unive
Actually, we are the engine of interpretation. Without us interpretation
does not exist. Because, interpretation is only possible through thoughts.
Peirce himself is telling something about conceptions, f.i. with the
following statement: "consider what effects, which might conceivably have
practic
Dear list subscribers,
I am onto this list for some 2 days or so and would
just like to introduce myself a little bit.
Regarding Peirce, it can be mentioned that I did not
read much. The only reason, a quite good one, why I enlisted is that I am very
much interested in both Semiotics a
38 matches
Mail list logo
