BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon, list
I have no idea what you mean by 'the subject matter of normative
science consists of the relations of phenomena to ends'.
And I disagree that the 'ideal end of semiosis is the development of
ha
Edwina, Jon S, List,
The passage you find puzzling is from Peirce. It can be hard to make out, in
part because the suggestion is so rich as a sort of guiding idea for the
normative sciences of aesthetics, ethics and semioitics, considered as a whole.
There are a number of attempts in the seco
Edwina, Jon, list,
Edwina, all the things that you question, disagree, or reject here will be
found in Peirce. He himself, for example, says that 'the subject matter of
normative science consists of the relations of phenomena to ends'.
Similarly, the 'ideal end of semiosis is the development of h
List, I think, for example, before we further analyze which determines which, e.g. the FI the DI or not, we should first get to a clearer definition of "determination", also by looking how it is used today in mathematics: deterministic chaos versus non-deterministic. Is determination non-causal, n
I agree as well. As important may be observations of Deely and others who
have already taken large steps in liberating Peirce's thought. I think
there is some urgency in establishing a triadic perspective about which
there should be little debate.
amazon.com/author/stephenrose
On Sat, Apr 7, 201
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Gary R - see my responses below:
On Sat 07/04/18 1:06 PM , Gary Richmond gary.richm...@gmail.com
sent:
Edwina, Jon, list,
1] Gary R: Edwina, all the things that you question, disagree, or
reject here will be found in Peirce. He
