I agree as well. As important may be observations of Deely and others who have already taken large steps in liberating Peirce's thought. I think there is some urgency in establishing a triadic perspective about which there should be little debate.
amazon.com/author/stephenrose On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:07 AM, John F Sowa <s...@bestweb.net> wrote: > I strongly agree with Mike B and Gary R. > > MB > >> I humbly suggest that intersection of interests is a more practical >> domain of inquiry than trying to find where your interpretations differ. >> > > GR > I have always thought... that those who want to promote Peirce's > philosophy in the world at large ought attempt to find what is most > > powerful, potentially productive and heuristic in Peirce that we can > more or less come to tentatively and fallibly agree on. Perhaps then > we can explore ways to send his profound insights into the world, > agreeing that some of these are considerable, perhaps inestimable > potential value. > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
