this is a good post, because it's specific in its critique. This is something that
might be answered, though I doubt anyone's interested in doing so.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ballard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 8/9/2003 10:52 PM
To:
The term export-led needs to be defined a bit more. I share some of
Marty's concerns and Doug is right that small countries in an era of
integration can't do much. But when speaking of China how much growth and
development is export-led? I am thinking of the Chinese internal market.
To take the
Quoting Anthony D'Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I share some of Marty's concerns and Doug is right that small
countries in an era of integration can't do much. But when speaking of
China how much growth and development is export-led?
My reply: As for Chinas export dependence, according to the
Price discrimination is an antitrust violation -- the
statute is the Robinson-Patman Act -- that can expose
the defendant to treble damages in a civil action, and
even if you win you have to pay me, or someone like
me, really godawful amounts of money to get you off.
(This is in fact largely what
- The total GDP (ppp) of China is supposed to be $6 trillion, as against a
GDP (ppp) of about $10 trillion for the USA.
- Per capita GDP in China is about $4,600, compared to a per capita GDP of
about $36,300 for the USA, in other words, net output value per head of
population, is about 8 times
NY Times Op-Ed
August 8, 2003
It All Depends on What You Mean by 'Have'
By STEVE MARTIN
So if you're asking me did Iraq have weapons of mass destruction, I'm
saying, well, it all depends on what you mean by have.
See, I can have something without actually having it. I can have a
cold, but I don't
Paulo wrote:
Hi
I seek to contact Louis Proyect
Louis recently wrote an open letter about AI's stance and quoted me.
I agree with most of what was written in the letter except the
interpretation of 'sitting on the fence' -- this would be the way AI
would like to portray itself, i.e.,
--- Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are two major differences that I can see in
the US legal definition of price discrimination
(below) and the economist's definition are
1) anti-trust law only applies to interstate
commerce, right? thus, it wouldn't apply to a local
business
My wife figured out what's happening with Europe's weather: Saddam's
WMD's went off, causing the Earth to change its normal rotation and to
spin into the sun...
http://www.allwatchers.com/MovieRView.asp?BRID=35341
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Here's what James Petras has said about an alternative for China:
The renewal of socialist development requires courage, new ideas and
recognition of the specificities of the Chinese society and economy. The
key is the courage to systematically reject the premises, language and
concepts
Anders wrote (in reply to many thoughts):
Maybe I'm not reading carefully enough, but did you answered
Doug's question about what your alternative would be? You say
what you would not advise them to do, but that's really not an
answer. I'm sure they could come up all by themselves lots
of
Devine, James wrote:
In my view, there are two levels or elements to imperialism as we
currently know it:
1) the hegemony of the US; and
2) imperialism as a world system of structured inequality,
domination, dependency, and exploitation.
The excessive emphasis on the first seems to be what Doug
Devine, James wrote:
do you think that writing a book can have that big an effect?
When I interviewed Naomi Klein, who spent most of the past year in
Argentina, she said that there were so many sectarian Trot parties
trying to tell the spontaneous mass assemblies what to do that they
turned lots
I wanted to change the subject/thread from markets to China. As far as
I can tell China is increasingly gaining attention as the one major
economic development success story, and from the right and from the
left. And I wanted to get Pen thoughts about how best to understand
what is happening
14 matches
Mail list logo
