I happen to be one who believes that there exists a difference in
articulation - not substance, between Frederick Engels and Karl Marx approach
to value and embrace the reshaping of the theory of value in the hands of
Marx. Nevertheless, both were revolutionaries approaching the emancipation
The Hand built Car
Value is the amount of socially necessary labor borne in the production of
commodities. All production is subject to this law and faces the downward
pressure of this law in the world of commodities.
Hand built automobiles - as commodities, must conform more than less, in
Engels misunderstood Marx's value theory, especially Marx's explanation of
money-form of commodity as physically accountable entity, but Marx
explains social, homogenous labor firstly as imaginary or ideal product.
Below is borrowed from Capital
I do not disagee that there existed a difference
In a message dated 2/2/2002 11:19:00 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 2/3/02 10:39 AM, Michael Perelman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miyachi's solution is not so simple. You have a new computer. Some of
the value will be transferred to the product today. You have no idea
It is not that Engels misunderstood Marx. Marx unfolded a new law system.
Engels agreed to the best of his ability. To continue.
MIYACHI TATSUO
PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT
KOMAKI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI Pre.
JAPAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is from Capital
The specific economic form,
It is not that Engels misunderstood Marx. Marx unfolded a new law system.
Marx ame first. Engels agreed to the best of his ability. To continue.
MIYACHI TATSUO
PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT
KOMAKI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI Pre.
JAPAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is from Capital
The specific
Auto Figures and Value: What's in your wallet?
The definitive Marxist Understanding of Value
Melvin P
Detroit: The figures - production units and profit estimates are slowly
coming in and by the months end should tell the story of the USNA based auto
industry. Cut-rate loans and discounts
In a message dated 2/5/2002 8:59:14 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As Cornel West's analysis of Marx's take on morality suggests, Marx
applied the standards of "bourgeois right" (trading at price = value) to
show that capitalist violates _its own standards_. Marx clearly had
In a message dated 2/5/2002 11:57:50 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose that you are looking at the value circulating in the economy today.
How would you value the constant capital values found in the commodities
produced? That will depend on whether the constant
Dialectics of Reform and Revolution in Argentina
Melvin P
Marx standpoint, or rather vision has always been that of man in his actual
or apparent circumstances of life, his pains, suffering, longings, material
activity and spiritual dimensions. Man dominates Marx vision from beginning
to
Note: The human eye cannot see emergence, or rather the outbreak of crisis is
witnessed at its second phase. Hence, prediction based on the law system
discovered by Karl Marx 150 years ago.
The capitalistic mode of production moves in these two forms of the
antagonism immanent to it from
4. AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH: NEW RACISM BASED ON CLASS, NOT
COLOR
By Nelson Peery
African American History Month, 2002 is celebrated in the midst of
economic, social and political changes that are reshaping our
world. The African Americans, along with the rest of the American
people,
Class-consciousness and the fundamentality of value
Class-consciousness means awareness of how classes fight for their material
survival in society. Classes are delineated in their general features on the
basis of one relation to property and property is ownership of things by
which the
In a message dated 2/8/2002 10:01:20 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The measurement of the capital stock is in impossibility. Franklin Fisher
once worked up the requirements for aggregation. Can't be done!
The inability to calculate real depreciation presents another
In a message dated 2/8/2002 10:49:51 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternatively Marx insisted that scientific method
to analyze concrete society must be began from abstract category, and
ascending to shape of concrete society (Engels modified title of Capital as
"process
In a message dated 2/9/2002 3:22:22 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I forgot to clarify Adam smith, Ricardo's deficit .
They all can't understand value-form. Although they reached to source of
value, but they failed to prove How value appeared as value-form, in which
highest
2/Triumph of the method of Marx
General Overview part 1
Melvin P.
The triumph of what is fundamentally an intellectual movement proceeding from
the assumptions and conclusions of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels is so
absolute in its resounding victory that no one in modern society can
2/Triumph of the method of Marx
General Overview part 2
Melvin P.
The place of antagonism in contradiction or rather the development of
contradiction as movement in antagonism has been the cliff from which man
Marxist theorist leaped to their theoretical death. Under our current
conditions
The New York Review of Books
February 28, 2002
Feature
The Betrayal of Capitalism
By Felix G. Rohatyn
During my nearly four years as ambassador to France I frequently gave a
speech I called Popular Capitalism in America to audiences throughout
France. This is a subject of intense interest to
A Future for Marxism? (Was: Wishful thinking)
by Justin Schwartz
12 February 2002 04:30 UTC
The argument is historical, and is available to anyone who has eyes in his
head. In the era of 2nd International, Marxism was a powerful force among
Western European workers. It bounced back, some,
In a message dated 2/12/2002 2:18:34 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had raised an objection to Fred's theory in 21987 and 99. I have
found that Samuel Hollander makes a similar criticism of Marx in his
classical Economics:
"The curve relating the profit rate and
In a message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2002 7:39:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, Alan Cibils
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 2/13/2002, you wrote:
Alan,
3) Verticalism
Doyle
This begs the question of how a mass organization can truly reflect the
views of the masses.
This is indeed a key
Melvin P writes:
In my estimate you capture the spirit and essence of the conflict with the
left groups and socialist sectarianist in their misconceived conception of
raising the consciousness of the masses. All sects, including the
ideological Marxist of all stripes, pride themselves
In a message dated 2/16/2002 11:36:02 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Microsoft and its rivals, like I.B.M. (news/quote) and Sun Microsystems
(news/quote), are scrambling to supply businesses with these services, which
will allow computers to share data across the Internet
In a message dated 2/19/2002 1:45:46 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
February 14, 2002 by the Inter Press Service
Argentina's Rebellion in the Neighborhoods
by Marcela Valente
BUENOS AIRES, Feb 13 - Neighborhood assemblies are springing up in
cities
throughout Argentina,
In a message dated 2/20/2002 2:37:31 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the necessity of socialism
Author: Sam Webb, national chairman, Communist Party USA
People's Weekly World Newspaper, Feb 16, 2002
During the CPUSA's pre-convention period about a year ago, we had a
And yet as brutal, raw and violent as it was, it didn't threaten the very future of humankind and the planet. Rosa Luxembourg said that the choices facing humanity at that time were either socialism or barbarism, but even the brilliant Rosa did not anticipate the new dangers that are in store
A New Era - A New Doctrine II
The teaching of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels is all-powerful because it
is true. Marx was a genius because he was able before anyone else to abstract
from all the writings of history the law system that governed changes in
society. Using the law system he
In a message dated 2/21/2002 3:10:30 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I present summary of article “Engels’ Edition of the Third Volume of
Capital and Marx's original Manuscript”by Michael Heinrich in
“ScienceSociety” Vol. 60 no.4(1996-1997;TheGuilford Press) In fear of
In a message dated 2/23/2002 10:25:27 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW2, I see that Jonas Savimbi died. He will not be missed.
Jim Devine
Couldn't happen to a better person.
Melvin P.
In a message dated 2/23/2002 10:47:30 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comment:1) Perhaps I am not clear about whether you are really serious about this or not, but the implications of this are that anyone who is unemployed and or a part of the lumpen elements - is
Comment: 1) Perhaps I am not clear about whether you are really serious
about this or not, but the implications of this are that anyone who is
unemployed and or a part of the lumpen elements - is objectively more
revolutionary than a person in a job in a car-plant;
2) This is an extrapolation
In a message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:37:47 AM Eastern Standard Time, Hari Kumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Cmde Melvin:
First, my sincere apologies #8211; you are right that I do indeed have shame
on me. Not however for asking the questions #8211; for I do NOT think it is
so
In a message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2002 3:44:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, Drewk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a reply to Charles Brown's pen-l 22901. (I hope to
respond to Tom Walker's question in pen-l 22893 soon.)
Charles asked me
Is it your position that the 'transformation
In a message dated Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:34:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, Devine, James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote: As far as I can tell, there's no logical argument either for or
against the existence of god.
Carrol:
The presumption is always that X doesn't exist; hence the
Dear Comrade Melvin:
Let me try to explain my viewpoint more clearly.
1) However I do not think I should have to explain myself any further, for
asking a question - any further. After all Marx writes: If it is scientific
task to resolve the outward visible movement into the inward and
3) You wrote: A new qualitative development must take place within the
working class whose growth and development is prevented by the framework of
capital. Electronic-digital production is its trajectory of development is
absolutely incompatible with a system based on the buying and selling
In a message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2002 1:21:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, Carrol Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We demand change in society along the direction of the productive forces,
No. Not true. _Many_ Marxists but by no means all put central emphasis
In a message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:54:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, Charles Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the necessity of socialism
by Waistline2
22 February 2002 19:17 UTC
Melvin:
On and off I have followed the politics of the CPUSA a little over thirty years; met
2) You say, Virtually all of us with a little gray in our heads developed a
conception of Marxism based on boundaries within capital that no longer
exist. I think as a vestigial die-hard, that the fundamentals have NOT
changed, that all economic avenues for capital are ultimately doomed.
Beginning in 1978 Zecharia Sitchin - one of the world renown linguist,
revolutionized this field of inquiry - including a substantial translation of
Gilgsmesh, with his 12th Planet, The Stairway to Heaven. The Wars of
Gods and Men, The Lost Realms, When Time Began, Devine Encounters,
The
Here is a more complete reply to the article by Mr Webb
What is new in the realm of economics and the Marxist movement - in my
opinion, is making concrete the conception and articulation of the concepts
of boundary, polarization, antagonism as a specific movement applicable to
today's
In a message dated 2/27/2002 7:56:38 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Melvin
MIYACHI TATSUO
Psychiatric Department
KOMAKI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
JOHBUSHI,1-20
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI Pre
JAPAN
0568-76-4131
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
productive force belongs to human being. Its force
acknowledged
Melvin P
In a message dated 2/27/2002 4:29:25 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We demand change in society along the direction of the
productive forces,
No. Not true. _Many_ Marxists but by no means all put central emphasis
on the "productive
In a message dated 2/28/2002 10:06:01 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote: How do we measure the "productive forces," anyway?
Miyachi writes: We measure productive force by quantity and value of commodities produced. It all. you forget always object people act on.
In a message dated 2/28/2002 8:56:25 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim wrote,
How do we measure the "productive forces," anyway? It seems that capitalism
would measure their development differently from other modes of production.
(Capitalism might measure them in terms of
In a message dated 2/28/2002 4:20:02 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a more complete reply to the article by Mr. Webb.
-clip-. Mr. Webb article is devoid
of any logic that something new has taken place in the world of economics in
my opinion - and elementary
How the hell can W pretend to be in favor of the wonders of
free trade
and want to put the imports on steel, just to get Ohio, PA and
WV votes?
Because it's about --and has been since at least as far back as Bush
I--managed trade, not free trade and not fair trade That is, managed trade
In a message dated 3/4/2002 7:17:33 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MARX AND HIS POSTERITY
Admittedly the founder of what has been the working-class movement shares
some responsibility in the confusion of the thought that is meant to be
Marxist or Marxism-related. But he did
In a message dated 3/4/2002 11:57:49 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question to Various comments in In Digest 77
by Davies, Daniel
-clip-
And whatever else
one thinks about Cohen's work, I think he has to be right that Marx had a
theory of history, and that this theory of
In a message dated 3/5/2002 6:14:29 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union
leader, like you. And I believed in "historical materialism", too. I
believed in it, because having not yet visited history by myself, I
In a message dated Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:51:56 AM Eastern Standard Time, Charles Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question to Various comments in In Digest 77
by Waistline2
05 March 2002 12:09 UTC
CB: Doesn't _The Manifesto of the Communist Party_ make it pretty clear that Marx's
theory
Question: Why is historical materialism in quotes? And is this different from what
Engels call the materialist conception of history in Anti-Durhing?
Melvin P.
In a message dated Tue, 5 Mar 2002 5:33:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, Peter Dorman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right. I argued in Actually Existing Globalization (published in a collection a
few years ago) that industrial policy is ultimately understandable only as
technology policy, but that
MIYACHI TATSUO, is this an accurate translation of pen-l: 23629? Reply to
follow in separate comment.
I think that Roemer's limit is about money. He doesn't refer to abolish
money.
In Critique of the Gotha programme Marx point out that in socialist
society exchange through (using?) money
MIYACHI TATSUO, your quote is too long to reproduce.
The only booklet I keep at reaching distance from the period of the
Sino-Soviet debate is On Khrushchev's Phony Communism and its historical
lessons for the World, Comment on the open letter of the Central Committee
of the CPSU,
In a message dated Thu, 7 Mar 2002 6:45:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, Carrol Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Romain Kroes wrote:
Because historical materialism has become a label.
I don't get it. Literary Criticism has become a label. Frying Bacon
has become a label. We still don't
In a message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2002 5:10:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, Justin
Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keep saying, it Charles, and maybe people will believe it. However, you've
worn me out, so you must be right, Marx solved all our problems, and I
embrace the true faith and
In a message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2002 1:49:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, John Ernst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doug, I think everything is a bit off the cuff here and
perhaps misses what might be important.
Among other things you wrote:
Not getting value theory right has inhibited just
In this, Roemer remains in the sphere of ownership, and forgets the sphere
of production. For producing profits material production must be presumed.
And for production, many firms must interact with each other and exchange
material, means of production, or intermediate commodities. Can coupon
In a message dated 3/15/2002 4:00:04 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comrade melvin
Thank you your reply
I propose some question on your argument.
1. I suggest that you grasp capitalist society as firstly relation between
buying and selling labor power and secondly surplus
Marx to L. Kugelmann in Hanover
London, July 11, 1868
. . . . As for the Centralblatt, the man is making the greatest possible
concession in admitting that, if one means anything at all by value, the
conclusion I draw must be accepted. The unfortunate fellow does not see that,
even if there
In a message dated 3/21/2002 6:42:04 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've always liked this letter to Kugelmann. Very Hegelian. Very important stress on the importance of theory for revolutionary transformation.
Whose translation is this?
Andrew Kliman
Progress
In a message dated 3/21/2002 3:23:50 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hope any relatives of sufferers will take cheer
rather than offence in my passing on that the motto
of the Irish Alzheimer's Disease Society is:
"Remember those who can't".
dd
Thanks for this.
In a message dated 3/21/2002 4:34:46 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 3/21/2002 6:42:04 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've always liked this letter to Kugelmann. Very Hegelian. Very important stress on the importance of theory for
In a message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2002 4:26:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, Charles
Jannuzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But Russians appear split on the reason for the ban: 35 percent said it
was
to help the domestic chicken industry, 34 percent said it was to keep
inferior U.S. chicken off
CB: On this issue, what about the fact that fascism _was_ defeated by the
Popular Front.
Do you mean the Allies? I wouldn't exactly call the military alliance
between Stalin and Churchill and Roosevelt a Popular Front. It was a
military alliance between sovereign nations. For that matter, I saw
CB: On this issue, what about the fact that fascism _was_ defeated by the
Popular Front.
Do you mean the Allies? I wouldn't exactly call the military alliance
between Stalin and Churchill and Roosevelt a Popular Front. It was a
military alliance between sovereign nations. For that matter, I saw
In a message dated 4/24/2002 1:31:01 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greg Schofield:
The Popular Front was one of the great modern innovations in effective
political struggle of the working class, at the plain of how communists
should work it relates directly to the Communist
test. system been down.
Sorry to push this discussion to pen. Problems with my system and posting to Marxline. System was down but I most certainly relied to all our comments. Here is one of 5 articles written i refutation of the race theory as applied to African Americans and the history of the national colonial
CB: Yes, your specific interpretation of Marxism may prohibit you, but not all interpretations of Marxism, including Marx's own interpretation of Marxism do not prohibit Marxists from speaking of race as an authentic concept of a Bolshevik strategist and tactician. As I have pointed out to you
Clearly, those of us providing material excavated from the historical
record about what actually happened are at a disadvantage in this
discussion. The fact is that Foner's dead right in noting that the
record includes multiracial organizations.
When Cde. Melvin says this is "insane," it is
The presentation of the national colonial question in respect to the direct descendants of the slaves that Marx refer to as the Negro race, has been observed over a long period of time by generations of communist. The presentation of this question is much broader than simply the use of the word
I might be biting off more than I can chew here:
In relation to the post someone made about Negroes in the USA being a 'nation'
and using the old 4 part definition of Stalin’s (common language, territory,
economic life and psychological make-up ). I have never seen this applied to
Black
CB: This list has not been a part of this discussion, so you might want to give more background.
The main point of contention between us is that you maintain that there is no category of " race" compatible with Marxism or historical materialism, and I say that there is.
For a thread, (long
Part 3 of 3
DRAFT OF PROGRAM, Anarcho-Syndicalism
Reply to Comrade MIYACHI TATSUO
Capital has both internal limits -- surplus value and profits come from unpaid living labor; and labor-replacing technology drives the amount of living labor towards zero; and external limits -- we live on a planet
On Marxline you wrote"
Melvin,
The shortest answer to all you say in these many, many posts is that "race" is a historical category. Basically, my answers will focus on that. You are wrong when you assert, argue, assume, insist, write at length, that race is only a biological and not a
Clueless 2
CB: Briefly, the CPUSA from the 1920's to about 1950 orso held that Black people in the US had the right to self-determination in theLeninist sense. They had the right to secede from the U.S. if they sochose. If you are familiar with the Leninistapproach to this, it implies not that
Brother U clueless . . . concerning the presentation of the national colonial question as it applies to the African American people.
Below is your exchange:
In relation to the post someone made about Negroes in the USA being a 'nation'
and using the old 4 part definition of Stalin's (common
Clueless 2
CB: Briefly, the CPUSA from the 1920's to about 1950 or so held that Black people in the US had the right to self-determination in the Leninist sense. They had the right to secede from the U.S. if they so chose. If you are familiar with the Leninist approach to this, it implies not
CB: What type of thing does Marx mean when he refers to a "Negro"CB: What type
of thing does Marx mean when he refers to a "Negro" ? A national colonial group
? Or does he mean a group whose skin is "branded" or whose skin is a brand ? A
group defined by its land, language, history ? Or a
CB: You have not been persuasive.
Obviously you jest.
Comrade, you first asked me to define the content of the Marxist analysis of the African American national colonial question concerning Booker T. Washington and Dr. Dubois and I answered this question concretely and destroyed your racial
Heather Cox Richardson. The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and
Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865-1901. Cambridge and
London: Harvard University Press, 2001. xvi + 312 pp. Notes index.
$39.95 (cloth), ISBN 0-674-00637-2.
It is really exciting and wonderful to read in your review
“Black and white, unite and fight!” is extremely disheartening to a man that believes in “Proletarians of the World Unite!, and “Workers and Oppressed People of the World Unite!,” which appears to perhaps be historically obsolete, given our current stage in the development of capital world wide.
"Black and white, unite and fight!" is extremely disheartening to a man that believes in "Proletarians of the World Unite!, and "Workers and Oppressed People of the World Unite!," which appears to perhaps be historically obsolete, given our current stage in the development of capital world wide.
CB: No. I get he idea that slavery was integral to the primitive accumulation of capitalism from Marx (Steal this idea!). It is not my idea or the CPUSA's right wing’s. It is Marx's idea. Quote:
The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of
CB: No. I get the idea that slavery was integral to the primitive accumulation of capitalism from Marx (Steal this idea!). It is not my idea or the CPUSA's right wing's. It is Marx's idea. Quote:
"The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of
In a message dated 5/30/02 10:46:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But this is why Oliver C. Cox's distinction between "racism" (and
"race") and "race antagonism" (or racial oppression) is so important.
For Cox, the former is ideological/superstructural, but the latter is
Finally How is your "communism" program? If it is vague, simply you argue
communism is good in abstract matter. Please tell me concrete program of
your "Communism"
Our side are leaded by people within which we create de-reifying movement
Reply,
I do not have a concrete communist program. I
In a message dated 5/30/02 8:12:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would differ with Melvin in one respect. I don't think that slaves
exactly replaced white indentured labor in the South, in the sense that
planters changed their crops to a large extent with the introduction
In a message dated 5/29/02 1:11:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chang, following Marx, also uses the Gemeinschaft vs.Gesellschaft distinction to demonstrate that "a race or a racial groupcannot be a class in the strictly economic-relational sense of classes." While, in
Comrade MIYACHI TATSUO,
I have read rather intensely your proposal or rather “DRAFT OF PROGRAM OF SOCIAL MOVEMENT IN 21st CENTURY,” “Analysis of contemporary capitalism,” along with reading of “On Association” and would like to approach this subject from a somewhat different entry point.
Comrade Miyachi,
You do not fight Marxist but bourgeois economist that glorify and mystify capital in its money form. You state things that make me think deeply, but are confusing at times. Perhaps, because thinking is required.
You state:
We must again analyze the peculiar principle of the
In a message dated 6/8/02 3:17:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2002.06.08 11:21 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the peculiar mode of operations means new type of capital accumulation. MIYACHI TATSUO
Psychiatric Department
Komaki municipal hosipital
Pardon my insistenceon pursuing this discussion. My awareness of a syndicalism tread in discussingMarx conception of the associate society as it develops on the basis of the human material shaped and evolved by capital was that of my own or rather in my own head. I am at my theoretical limit and
In a message dated 6/9/02 1:36:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melvin P
Thank you your reply
The Commmodyfing capital seems to be difficult to understand.
So I am now studying "radical problem of credit"(By YAMAMOY0)
In it he argue new credit system analysis .
You should
In a message dated 6/12/02 12:05:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Inheritance tax is Marxist
by Ian Murray
12 June 2002
Manifesto
of the Communist Party
1848
http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html#Proletarian
Of course, in the beginning, this
1 - 100 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
