Latter. I know its the wrong list really but curiosity got the better
of me.
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007, at 04:40, Michael Kernaghan wrote:
While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from
CPAN onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of
grief;
On 9/10/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Kernaghan wrote:
> > While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from CPAN
> > onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of grief;
> > although identical installs are great under XP. I just flat ga
Michael Kernaghan wrote:
> While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from CPAN
> onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of grief;
> although identical installs are great under XP. I just flat gave up
> using Vista for Perl. I feel sad, but what can one do?
I
On 9/10/07, Michael Kernaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from CPAN
> onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of grief;
> although identical installs are great under XP. I just flat gave up
> using Vista for Perl. I f
On 10 Sep 2007, at 04:40, Michael Kernaghan wrote:
While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from
CPAN onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of
grief; although identical installs are great under XP. I just
flat gave up using Vista for Perl. I feel sad
While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from CPAN
onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of grief;
although identical installs are great under XP. I just flat gave up
using Vista for Perl. I feel sad, but what can one do?
Andy Armstrong wrote:
-B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:57, Abe Timmerman wrote:
I was running dmake test for Tk. Under CPAN this would have lead to a
non-install, although no tests really failed.
Thanks. When I get a moment I'll fire up a Win32 box and see if I can
reproduce it w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Andy,
> On 9 Sep 2007, at 13:24, Abe Timmerman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
>> Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
>
>> I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
>
> What
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:04, Ovid wrote:
>> As I recall, we've hit the same problem with another module (POE?) and
>> I'm thinking that extending the TAP grammar here might be the key.
>> Specifically, consider this:
>>
>> 1..0 # SKIP some reason
>>
>> The '1..0' is 'skip all'
On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:04, Ovid wrote:
As I recall, we've hit the same problem with another module (POE?) and
I'm thinking that extending the TAP grammar here might be the key.
Specifically, consider this:
1..0 # SKIP some reason
The '1..0' is 'skip all' and the 'SKIP' is redundant except that
--- Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > C:\download\Tk-804.027-9793>perl595 -Mblib t\Kr.t
> > 1..0 # Skipped: locale's 'iso-8859-1' cannot represent Korean.
>
> The TAP grammar we're working to has it as /^1..0\s+#\s*SKIP\b/i - so
>
> Skippped doesn't match.
>
> It occurs to me that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2007, at 13:24, Abe Timmerman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
What are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
t\00wmcheck#
# Tk platform:MSWin32
# XFT:no
t\00wmcheck...
13 matches
Mail list logo
