On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:09 AM, nadim khemir wrote:
I received an answer from Eric :
I wish I did have some kind of comparison. Here's what one user wrote
about choosing cabie:
http://www.golden-gryphon.com/blog/manoj/blog/2007/11/06/Continuous_Automated_Build_and_Integration_Environment.html
On Jan 4, 2008, at 5:56 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:23:52PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
David Cantrell wrote:
If anyone can give me an idiots' guide to how to grab the most
recent
source tree, build it, and test it, then I can test it on the
Turns out the parrot build/test failed on SVN revision 24566, but
passed in revision 24567
So, I am gonna see if i can make a buildbot config to build and test
parrot, using an SVN polling configuration where I'll try and check
the SVN repo every N minutes and then do a checkout/build/test
# from Matisse Enzer
# on Saturday 05 January 2008 13:25:
Turns out the parrot build/test failed on SVN revision 24566, but
passed in revision 24567
So, I am gonna see if i can make a buildbot config to build and test
parrot, using an SVN polling configuration where I'll try and check
the
On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Is there any sort of build_ok/test_ok matrix for $svn_rev x
$platform
for parrot? Distributed, cross-platform projects tend to suffer
from oh yeah, trunk is broken on $platform right now (i.e. as of 10
minutes ago), which is hard to know if
I've set up a parrot buildmaster/slave, currently located at:
http://buildbot.eigenstate.net:8040/
---
Matisse Enzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.matisse.net/ - http://www.eigenstate.net/
On Thursday 03 January 2008 19.42.26 nadim khemir wrote:
I did send a mail to cabie author asking if he had made a comparison
between cabie and other systems. I also invited him to join us on this
mailing list. I'll forward his answer if he does answer me.
I received an answer from Eric :
I
David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:23:52PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
David Cantrell wrote:
If anyone can give me an idiots' guide to how to grab the most recent
source tree, build it, and test it, then I can test it on the same boxes
as I do CPAN testing, plus maybe a couple
On 2 Jan 2008, at 20:02, nadim khemir wrote:
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl).
Does that make it better? :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 3 Jan 2008, at 09:15, Adrian Howard wrote:
On 2 Jan 2008, at 20:02, nadim khemir wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 10.11.41 Matisse Enzer wrote:
I've spent some of this holiday season learning how to set up
BuildBot
...
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 3 Jan 2008, at 09:15, Adrian Howard wrote:
There's also Michael's rather swizzy Smolder project.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/smolder
Indeed. Smolder++. You still need something to manage a build farm
though. I got about 80% done on Test::SmokeStack
On 3 Jan 2008, at 12:53, Michael Peters wrote:
My Python Fu is weak but I spent a productive couple of hours hacking
about with buildbot last night. My aim is to make it easy to test all
the modules in my SVN against multiple Perl's on multiple machines
and
have the config changes to add a new
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:02 PM, nadim khemir wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 10.11.41 Matisse Enzer wrote:
I've spent some of this holiday season learning how to set up
BuildBot
...
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl).
http://cabie.tigris.org/
Can
On Thursday 03 January 2008 11.50.03 Andy Armstrong wrote:
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl).
Does that make it better? :)
RTFM! In the feature list the authors writes * It's really cool!. Since cool
is better than good, I assume it is ;)
The written in
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:23:52PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
David Cantrell wrote:
If anyone can give me an idiots' guide to how to grab the most recent
source tree, build it, and test it, then I can test it on the same boxes
as I do CPAN testing, plus maybe a couple of others.
svn co
David Cantrell wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:50PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
If anyone can give me an idiots' guide to how to grab the most recent
source tree, build it, and test it, then I can test it on the same boxes
as I do CPAN testing, plus maybe a couple of others.
svn co
On Jan 1, 2008, at 5:23 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
svn co https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk/ parrot_test
cd parrot_test
perl Configure.pl
make
make test
(If you're not looking to commit, you may be able to get by with
http rather than https: UNTESTED.)
('make smoke' can be substituted for
On Saturday 29 December 2007 10.11.41 Matisse Enzer wrote:
I've spent some of this holiday season learning how to set up BuildBot
...
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl).
http://cabie.tigris.org/
Cheers, Nadim.
On Saturday 29 December 2007 10.11.41 Matisse Enzer wrote:
I've spent some of this holiday season learning how to set up BuildBot
...
I've also found this one to be written in Perl:
http://www.johnkeiser.com/mozilla/tbox3.html
other links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Integration
# from nadim khemir
# on Wednesday 02 January 2008 12:02:
Cabie seems to be as good, if not better (psst, it's written in Perl).
http://cabie.tigris.org/
Well, it says it is written in PERL, which I have found to be a very
scary and unworkable language derived from FORTRAN or maybe C ;-)
That
On Dec 31, 2007, at 4:24 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:50PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
How might this be used to perform smoke-testing for a project like
Parrot, where we want to test on many combinations of operating
system,
platform and C compiler?
If
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:50PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
How might this be used to perform smoke-testing for a project like
Parrot, where we want to test on many combinations of operating system,
platform and C compiler?
If anyone can give me an idiots' guide to how to grab the most
On 29 Dec 2007, at 09:11, Matisse Enzer wrote:
For now I have the build status pages for the three projects at:`
http://buildbot.eigenstate.net:8010/
http://buildbot.eigenstate.net:8020/
http://buildbot.eigenstate.net:8030/
That's very interesting Matisse. We currently have a fairly ad-hoc
On Dec 29, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
That's very interesting Matisse. We currently have a fairly ad-hoc
smoking setup for Test::Harness that runs on a few machines here. It
looks as if I could replace that and make it more flexible using
buildbot.
Do you have any useful
On 29 Dec 2007, at 18:46, Matisse Enzer wrote:
On Dec 29, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
That's very interesting Matisse. We currently have a fairly ad-hoc
smoking setup for Test::Harness that runs on a few machines here.
It looks as if I could replace that and make it more flexible
Matisse Enzer wrote:
I've spent some of this holiday season learning how to set up BuildBot
(http://buildbot.net/) which is a Continuous Integration system that is
especially aimed at open-source style projects: You set up a central
build master, and one or more build slaves - and it is very
26 matches
Mail list logo
