On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, $Bill Luebkert wrote:
Brian Steele wrote:
Well lessee, choosing between one that automatically uses file association,
and one that offers it as a configurable option (the result being that
you'll find it enabled on some servers but not on others - great for
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, $Bill Luebkert wrote:
Brian Steele wrote:
Answers:
1. The reason why more IIS servers have been compromised than Apache servers
has more to do with administration ignorance rather than anything else IMO.
Ex: Nimda - MS had the fix out before Nimda arrived, but did
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Brian Steele wrote:
The only problem with this analysis is that, based on the info I'm getting
on my security lists these days, MORE bugs are being found now with
open-source software than with MS software.
It's just basic probability in action:
New versions =
The point is that Apache is less prone to attack for some reason. Better
initial coding possibly with fewer holes ?? With Apache there are seldom
fixes going out since the initial code was written with security in mind.
Rarely is it necessary to upgrade or patch for a security fix and
* The illusion that Windows is easy to configure. People
think that you
don't need to know so much to configure Windows. This is wrong. The
complexity is there, but you don't see it, and you don't
control it. When
you don't know Unix, you can pretty much feel you're not the
king of
I believe that PWS requires that you place all CGIs in its own scripts
directory, unless you explicitly set your preferences otherwise. As long as
the scripts are in the correct place and PWS is running, chances are that
your 500 errors are a result of something else. On Windows, the shebang line
, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Perl Users
Subject: Re: Getting cgis to work
Scot Robnett wrote:
On Windows, the shebang
line
is almost a frivolity - as long as the script has a .pl or .cgi extension
(and you have .cgi associated with perl.exe), it should run
, August 15, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Getting cgis to work
Scot Robnett wrote:
On Windows, the shebang
line
is almost a frivolity - as long as the script has a .pl or .cgi
extension
(and you have .cgi associated with perl.exe), it should run. I'm
: Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Getting cgis to work
Scot Robnett wrote:
On Windows, the shebang
line
is almost a frivolity - as long as the script has a .pl or .cgi
extension
(and you have .cgi associated with perl.exe
+access and you'd see what I mean :-).
Brian
- Original Message -
From: $Bill Luebkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Perl Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Getting cgis to work
[snip]
* Apache is driven by feature-to-market, IIS is driven
Sisyphus wrote:
Hi,
Is Apache now considered to be secure in a production environment on Windows
?
12 months ago it wasn't.
Sorry it's an OT thread it's already long enough I haven't
been following it the answer to my question has probably already been
given .
11 matches
Mail list logo
