[PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.40

2005-09-23 Thread Paul Marquess
Sync core with CPAN Paul zlib-1.40.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

RE: Zlib 2.00_02 on VMS

2005-09-21 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Sorry for the late reaction ] Op een mooie zomerdag (Sunday 11 September 2005 23:39),schreef Paul Marquess: From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Op een mooie zomerdag (Sunday 11 September 2005 19:14),schreef Paul

RE: Zlib 2.00_03 / Blead 25366 on VMS + patched vms.c

2005-09-17 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: According to your previous post that means that the only thing left failing is one test in globmapper.t ext/Compress/Zlib/t/globmapper.t 68 of 69 ok That was a typo, there are only 68 tests in globmapper

Lots of warnings building [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-09-17 Thread Paul Marquess
This is with gcc 3.4.3 $ make test `sh cflags optimize='-g' miniperlmain.o` miniperlmain.c CCCMD = gcc-3.4.3 -DPERL_CORE -c -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gdbm -g

[PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.39

2005-09-16 Thread Paul Marquess
Syncs core with CPAN Paul zlib-1.39.patch Description: Binary data

RE: Zlib 2.00_03 / Blead 25366 on VMS + patched vms.c

2005-09-16 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] John E. Malmberg wrote: Paul Marquess wrote: Editing 16oneshot.t to remove the './' from the $tmpdir and re-running the script makes it pass all 2544 tests. I've removed the leading './' from the all the $tmpdir directory variables

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-15 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi This is the verbose output of the lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t test case after my modification in the ext/Encode/Makefile.PL as discussed earlier. 1..26 ok 1 - use DBM_Filter; ok 2 - use SDBM_File; ok 3 - use Fcntl; ok 4 - use charnames; ok 5 -

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-14 Thread Paul Marquess
is with lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t and I guess Dan can address this! Dan! The workaround for encode() is not complete. Can you recheck it? -regards Sastry On 9/13/05, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HI Paul On 9/13/05

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page iso-8859-16 and the normal DBM_Filter to store and verify the same. Other tests in DBM_Filter are working fine on

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Dan Kogai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sep 13, 2005, at 07:42 , Paul Marquess wrote: Dan, I'm not sure what is going on here. Can I walk through one of the failing test to see if it rings any bells with you? Before that I would like to make sure if I understand the scope

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HI Paul On 9/13/05, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page

RE: Zlib 2.00_03 / Blead 25366 on VMS + patched vms.c

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I finally got a download of 2.00_03, and I have locally patched vms.c to fix the fstat()/Perl_cando() issue. So here are the results. I probably will not have time to investigate the failure tonight as I need to submit the patch to vms.c.

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
' = 'am' # 'lh' = '©ì' # ok 26 - untie without inner references # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 26. On 9/9/05, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you saying that the 4 byte string euro(ASCII hex 65 75 72 6F) is being stored as '/Ä,' (hex 2F C4 3E 2C) ? The value I am getting

RE: ZLIB 2.0 / Blead 25366 on VMS

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
[ John, I've combined responses to two of your messages into one here] From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: ... I see that the majority of the failures match those that Abe Timmerman reported earlier today. Apart from running with bleed what else

RE: ZLIB 2.0 / Blead 25366 on VMS

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Tom Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In message 20050911232132.CDZH22901.aamta10- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks John. I've CCed Tom Hughes for the IO:Zlib results. The external gzip support in IO::Zlib is all Jarkko's work and nothing

RE: ZLIB 2.0 / Blead 25366 on VMS

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
I've just uploaded Compress::Zlib 2.000_03 onto CPAN. This should hopefully silence some of the failures on VMS. http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PM/PMQS/Compress-Zlib-2.000_03.tar. gz Paul

RE: ZLIB 2.0 / Blead 25366 on VMS

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... ext/Compress/Zlib/t/04def.t fails on test 102 and dies. not ok 102 - create IO::Gzip # Failed test ([-.ext.compress.zlib.t]04def.t at line 322) Can't call

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
Dan, I'm not sure what is going on here. Can I walk through one of the failing test to see if it rings any bells with you? I'll use the utf8.t test, because it is a bit more straightforward. I first write these key/value pairs to the DBM file with a utf8 encoding filter in place

RE: Blead 25366 on VMS - Only ZLIB still failing for unknown reasons

2005-09-11 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the status of Blead 25366 (Sept 9, 2005 download) on VMS. Only the ZLIB test is failing for unknown reasons. Paul, if your changes got applied to blead, then they are still not working. Otherwise, I have pulled down the latest ZLIB

RE: Zlib 2.00_02 on VMS

2005-09-11 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Op een mooie zomerdag (Sunday 11 September 2005 19:14),schreef Paul Marquess: From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the status of Blead 25366 (Sept 9, 2005 download) on VMS. Only the ZLIB test is failing for unknown

RE: ZLIB 2.0 / Blead 25366 on VMS

2005-09-11 Thread Paul Marquess
Thanks John. I've CCed Tom Hughes for the IO:Zlib results. I see that the majority of the failures match those that Abe Timmerman reported earlier today. Apart from running with bleed what else is different between the two versions that could account for the extra failures you are seeing? Is it

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-09 Thread Paul Marquess
Are you saying that the 4 byte string “euro”(ASCII hex 65 75 72 6F) is being stored as '/Ä,' (hex 2F C4 3E 2C) ? Can you post the verbose output from running the lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t test harness please? Not sure how different EBDCIC platforms are from Unix-land, but this is how you would

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on VMS initial results

2005-09-06 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] John E. Malmberg wrote: Initial results on 25308 blead on OpenVMS/Alpha. ... ext/Compress/Zlib/t/03examplesFAILED at test 10 ext/Compress/Zlib/t/06gzdopen.FAILED--unexpected output at test 0 ... Failed 16

[PATCH] Compress::Zlib-1.38

2005-09-06 Thread Paul Marquess
Syncs the core with CPAN Paul zlib-1.38.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

[ANNOUNCE] Compress::Zlib 2.x beta available on CPAN

2005-08-22 Thread Paul Marquess
I've just uploaded a beta version of Compress::Zlib version 2 onto CPAN. This is a substantial rewrite of Compress::Zlib that has touched the majority of the existing code as well as adding some new features. I know a lot of other modules rely either directly or indirectly on Compress::Zlib, so

RE: [PATCH] 5.9.x (and 5.8.x): Symbian update

2005-08-18 Thread Paul Marquess
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The 5.9.x patch is against the patch level 25301, and contains minor const-change induced changes, plus adding Compress::Zlib to the set of supported extensions (also adding IO::Zlib). Note the changes to Zlib.xs: firstly because there can

RE: [PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.36

2005-08-12 Thread Paul Marquess
-Original Message- From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 August 2005 06:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; perl5-porters@perl.org Cc: vmsperl@perl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.36 Op een mooie zomerdag (Sunday 07 August 2005 23:47),schreef Paul Marquess

[PATCH @ 24148] Compress::Zlib 1.37

2005-08-12 Thread Paul Marquess
This syncs bleed with the latest Compress::Zlib on CPAN cheers Paul zlib-1.37.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

RE: [PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.36

2005-08-07 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Op een mooie zomerdag (Saturday 06 August 2005 00:12),schreef Paul Marquess: This is mostly VMS fixes. Standalone version has just been uploaded to CPAN. Could someone on please try building testing 1.36 on VMS using the CPAN release

RE: [PATCH] warning wrongly tagged as fatal error in perldiag.pod

2005-08-06 Thread Paul Marquess
From: ethan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:31:27PM +0200 Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: On 8/5/05, Tassilo von Parseval [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other than that, this 'thread failed to start' warning is really hard to get rid of. Should any of the warnings in

[PATCH] Compress::Zlib 1.36

2005-08-05 Thread Paul Marquess
This is mostly VMS fixes. Standalone version has just been uploaded to CPAN. Could someone on please try building testing 1.36 on VMS using the CPAN release please? Paul zlib-1.36.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext/Compress/Zlib on VMS.

2005-08-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Abe Timmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: This leaves the case where C::Zlib is built away from the core, which is what the original code did $Inc = '-I[.blib.lib] -I[.blib.arch]' Once someone gets around to building C::Zlib away from the core we can

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext/Compress/Zlib on VMS.

2005-08-03 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: From: John E. Malmberg much snipping From what I have seen of the other tests, the INC setting when running these tests is usually inherited from the parent, and I have seen the tests use a test when deciding to use

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext/Compress/Zlib on VMS.

2005-08-02 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Unless VMS works completely differently to Unix-land, that isn't the case. The code that is triggering the error is this: In this case it does. The input and output redirections on the command line are handled by VMS specific code

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext/Compress/Zlib on VMS.

2005-08-01 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The script 03examples.t is failing at test 1 because the includes seem to be set wrong for VMS. --- ext/compress/zlib/t/03examples_t.blead Sun Jul 31 22:54:06 2005 +++ ext/compress/zlib/t/03examples.tSun Jul 31 22:54:12 2005 @@

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext/Compress/Zlib on VMS.

2005-08-01 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Marquess wrote: - $Inc = '-I[.blib.lib] -I[.blib.arch]'; + $Inc = '-I[-.lib] -I[-.arch]'; } elsif ($^O eq 'MSWin32') { foreach (@INC) Is this the layout needed for running these tests when Compress::Zlib

RE: [PATCH] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on OpenVMS (not good)

2005-07-26 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:37:03AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote: The zlib module would not build. I had to change the makefile.pl to fix that. What was needed is a space between the @ and a macro which expanded to MCR imagename.

RE: [PATCH] blead help for VMS

2005-07-25 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Craig A. Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The attached patch (plus one additional step) gets bleadperl building on VMS again. The additional step is renaming the directory ext/Compress/Zlib/zlib-src-1.2.3 to ext/Compress/Zlib/zlib-src which I assume needs to be done in

RE: Creating your own FH interface -- intended behavour?

2005-07-25 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Jos I. Boumans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, i was happily programming along, and in the course of events found the need to have an FH like interface, with a custom backend. I found that these two invocations, on the same object do not produce the same result:

RE: Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List-Utils on 5.004

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Nicholas Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicholas Clark On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:32:30PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: I guess another way to look at this is to ask why has nobody else noticed the problem with these modules? Scalar-Util/Cwd/File-Spec are all fairly

RE: Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List-Utils on 5.004

2005-07-20 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... I haven't even heard from a 5.5.x user in a while. Solaris 2.8 ships with 5.005_03 and we have an application at work that is still being developed that uses it. That said, here's how far back the CPAN versions of the critical modules

RE: Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List-Utils on 5.004

2005-07-19 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: Is there any way out of this maze of twisty little passages? Install File::Spec by hand? Use 5.004_05 which comes with File::Spec? I think the assumption that Perl will come

Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List-Utils on 5.004

2005-07-18 Thread Paul Marquess
I've been attempting to build Scalar-List-Utils-1.17 with perl5.004, but I've encountered a circular dependency in the modules that get used by the build process $ cd Scalar-List-Utils-1.17 $ perl5.004 Makefile.PL Can't locate File/Spec.pm in @INC at inc/Module/Install/Can.pm -

RE: Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List-Utils on 5.004

2005-07-18 Thread Paul Marquess
: Circular dependency prevents installation of Scalar-List- Utils on 5.004 On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:30:27 +0100, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been attempting to build Scalar-List-Utils-1.17 with perl5.004, but I've encountered a circular dependency in the modules that get used

RE: problem building latest perl (24978) on win32

2005-07-18 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Dave Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:03:55PM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: But if Compress::Zlib links to private zlib code or libz.a then there are two copies of code and associated symbols in the application and that can cause confusion at best and

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?)

2005-07-05 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: Whilst I'm here, when I do get around to posting a beta on CPAN, I'd prefer it doesn't get used in anger until it has bedded-in. If I give the module a version number

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?)

2005-07-05 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Nicholas Clark On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:32:34PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] But if you are doing a beta leading up to a 2.000 release, it should be numbered 2.000, e.g. 1.990_01. Nothing wrong with a 2.000_01 beta

RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +0100, Ben Evans wrote: I would say that this cascade effect is precisely why you *should* drop 5.004 compatability. There's no excuse other than if it ain't broke, don't fix it for running such an

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?)

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Konovalov, Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I ... I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which in turn is C and developed

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wi ld?)

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: David Landgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Konovalov, Vadim wrote: I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I ... I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which in turn

RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:00:14AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +0100, Ben Evans wrote: I would say that this cascade effect is precisely why you *should* drop 5.004 compatability. There's no excuse

RE: [PATCH] XSLoader for Storable

2005-06-30 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:01:15AM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote: DynaLoader is documented as needing to be inherited from. You screw with that you flirt with breakage just to avoid writing one line of code. My patch has nothing to do

I can't get closure on my closure issue

2005-06-15 Thread Paul Marquess
Consider this code for (1 .. 3) { my $outer = 0 ; sub mkClosure { sub { $outer = 1234 } ; } { mkClosure() }(); print outer $outer\n ; } With all perl's except the bleeding edge I get this $ perl5.8.5 try outer

RE: I can't get closure on my closure issue

2005-06-15 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote: On Jun 15, Paul Marquess said: Consider this code for (1 .. 3) { my $outer = 0 ; sub mkClosure { sub { $outer = 1234 } } { mkClosure() }(); print

RE: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver' in test output

2005-06-11 Thread Paul Marquess
There's a stray print in 05gzsetp.t - the enclosed patch removes it. Paul -Original Message- From: Dave Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2005 11:50 To: perl5-porters@perl.org Subject: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver' in test output I've noticed the recently integrated

RE: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver' in test output

2005-06-11 Thread Paul Marquess
Actually scrub that patch and use this one instead - it syncs completely with my development copy. Paul -Original Message- From: Paul Marquess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2005 14:10 To: 'Dave Mitchell'; 'perl5-porters@perl.org' Subject: RE: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver

RE: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver' in test output

2005-06-11 Thread Paul Marquess
Sorry - sent the wrong copy of the patch. The correct copy is enclosed. Paul -Original Message- From: Paul Marquess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2005 16:00 To: 'Dave Mitchell'; 'perl5-porters@perl.org' Subject: RE: 05gzsetp.t and initial 'ver' in test output Actually

Trotz Stellenabbau

2005-05-14 Thread Paul . Marquess
Lese selbst: http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,338652,00.html

Good day

2005-04-19 Thread paul . marquess
-- Virus Warning Message (on jazzdrum) Found virus WORM_MYTOB.AN in file file.exe (in file.zip) The file file.zip is moved to /export/virus/virDKF0obOTd. - The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a

[PATCH] DB_File 1.811

2005-03-12 Thread Paul Marquess
Minor change to fix a DBM Filter issue. Paul db_file-1.811.patch Description: Binary data

RE: Core dump in 5.8.6

2005-02-24 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Kean Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, This is my first posting to this list so go easy :) While doing a make test on the BerkeleyDB module I am getting a core dump from perl. A stack trace shows its breaking in Perl_newRV_noinc (tmpRef=0x0), called from Perl_newRV

RE: [perl #33054] Segmentation fault in DB_File with perl-5.8.6 gcc-3.3.2

2005-02-03 Thread Paul Marquess
it will be difficult for me to do further investigation of gcc-3.3.2+ or -3.4+ Robin -Original Message- From: Paul Marquess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 February 2005 17:39 To: 'Robin Barker' Subject: RE: [perl #33054] Segmentation fault in DB_File with perl-5.8.6 gcc-3.3.2

RE: [RFC] More core integration

2005-01-19 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Jos I. Boumans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Archive::Tar requires IO::String, which has no more prerequisites, and a perfect test result: http://testers.cpan.org/show/IO-String.html Archive::Tar optionally supports compressed tarballs via IO::Zlib,

RE: Add exception handling macros for XS code (was: Re: Catching Perl_croak() from XS)

2005-01-03 Thread Paul Marquess
Sounds very useful. Count me in favour. On a slightly related topic, I've wanted something to handle exceptions in XS, but I'm specifically interested in catching C++ exceptions in XS, converting them into Perl exceptions then sending them back into Perl to be caught with an eval. To date I've

RE: [perl #33054] Segmentation fault in DB_File with perl-5.8.6 gcc-3.3.2

2004-12-16 Thread Paul Marquess
Can you get a stack trace from the core dump please? Paul -Original Message- From: Robin Barker (via RT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2004 16:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [perl #33054] Segmentation fault in DB_File with perl-5.8.6 gcc- 3.3.2 # New Ticket

minor build issues with bleed 5.8.6 tobe

2004-10-29 Thread Paul Marquess
Noticed these two unexpected warnings when building both the bleeding edge the latest 5.8.6 snapshot. I'm running Mandrake Linux with gcc 3.3.2 This was output when running Configure Getting the current patchlevel... ./Configure: line 5868: test: : integer expression expected And this when

RE: ETA for 5.8.6?

2004-10-15 Thread Paul Marquess
And what about 5.10? It's been a lng time since 5.8.x hit the streets. Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Hay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 October 2004 16:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ETA for 5.8.6? When is 5.8.6 planned for? We had got into a routine of new

RE: Handling failure in source code filters

2004-10-13 Thread Paul Marquess
I can't remember if the negative return code was put there as a possible future enhancement to the filters, but I *think* the intention was is that if a source filter gets into an error state (like not being able to decrypt encrypted source in your case) it should print an error message and croak

RE: version object updates

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Marquess
From: John Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Paul Marquess wrote: Does that mean that this is the case? 1.10 1.2 Depends; are you talking about version objects or the parameters, also whether the parameters were quoted: version-new(1.10)version-new(1.2

RE: [PATCH] DB_File 1.806

2002-10-22 Thread Paul Marquess
On Tue 22 Oct 2002 12:24, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the complete package Relaying the positive results back to p5p. Hope you don't mind :) No problem. Thanks for the lightning turnaround. I've just uploaded it to CPAN. As a side note, can you report the installed

RE: [PATCH] RE: BerkeleyDB-0.19: Modification of a read-only value attempted

2002-08-20 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The patch further back in this thread has changed the ckFilter macro to look like this: #define ckFilter(arg,type,name) \ if (db-type

RE: BerkeleyDB-0.19: Modification of a read-only value attempted

2002-08-02 Thread Paul Marquess
Torsten, Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm just back from holiday. I can reproduce the problem you have found, and your fix does work. The only thing is that the filter code already saves $_ before calling the filters. Obviously it isn't working in this instance. By the way this problem

RE: QuotedPrint as layer, Base64 not?

2002-06-30 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Elizabeth Mattijsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] At 11:52 PM 6/28/02 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: The biggest problem I see with this is that naive users copying examples from various places won't know that it's using the IOLayer::Base64 module, because you're hiding that fact from them

RE: QuotedPrint as layer, Base64 not?

2002-06-30 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think I prefer the unadorned open( my $in,'Via(Base64)','file.mime' ); to mean use IOLayer::Base64. I would too, but I think it should imply PerlIO::Via::Base64. Or we should change

RE: Warnings problem in Core XS modules

2002-05-17 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Paul Marquess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How difficult would it be for the core to put the cop_warnings value somewhere before an XSUB gets called? That might be worth considering. In fact, does the concept of a valid

RE: Encode should stay undefphobia

2002-04-30 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Dan Kogai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 02:10 , Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: Dan Kogai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please don't. $a =~ tr/A/a/; gives a warning so should encode/decode. How can I be so dumb for not anticipating you say that! (Blame it on

[PATCH] more warnings tidyup

2002-03-10 Thread Paul Marquess
This patch does two things. First it finished off the packWARN changes I started in the last patch. Secondly it moves the deprecated warnings created since 5.6.1 out of the syntax category. Still todo 1. Check for untested warnings 2. Check perldigd.pod Paul warnings.patch.gz Description:

RE: being told when the $ penalty has been incurred

2002-03-04 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Jeffrey Friedl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Wanting to know exactly when the $ penalty is incurred, I modified my version of bleedperl by adding a new warning type WARN_AMP to warnings.pl, and adding if (ckWARN(WARN_AMP)) Perl_warner(aTHX_ WARN_AMP, use of $%c imparts a

RE: Smoke 13272 /pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current

2001-11-26 Thread Paul Marquess
From: H.Merijn Brand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Failures: l1 MANIFEST errors: did not declare ext/DB_File/constants.h did not declare ext/DB_File/constants.xs did not declare ext/Devel/PPPort/harness/ppport.h These all generated by running the appropriate Makefile.PL Paul

RE: PERFORCE change 13162 for review

2001-11-22 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:00:06 -0800, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: (PPPort.pm) +#else +# define newRV_noinc(sv)\ +((PL_Sv=(SV*)newRV(sv), SvREFCNT_dec(sv), (SV*)PL_Sv) +#endif +# endif +#endif The middle line

RE: [PATCH pod/perlhack.pod t/op/pack.t] Fixing bad testing advice

2001-08-28 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Robin Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Michael Schwern wrote: Ah HA! I've been wondering why nobody ever thinks to write a simple ok() function for their tests! perlhack has bad testing advice. Could you explain the advantage of having a simple ok() function? As somebody

RE: 5.6.0 BUG: Lexical warnings aren't lexical

2001-03-25 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Gurusamy Sarathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:43:18 EST, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: Without having a look at the code, I can't remember why that decision was made. I'll have a look at the code this evening. Did you find anything out? I've only had a chance to

RE: [ID 20000325.008] 5.6, source filters, modules, and __END__ g o boom

2000-03-27 Thread paul . marquess
From: Rocco Caputo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Sun, 26 Mar 2000 22:26:58 +0100, Marquess,P,Paul,NEL38 R wrote: I can't reproduce the __END__/__DATA__ problem on my Linux box at all (Mandrake 6.1), but I've removed the use of IoFLAGS anyway. I don't think I need to set the IOf_FAKE_DIRP

RE: semantics of version tuples and arithmetics?

2000-02-15 Thread paul . marquess
From: Gurusamy Sarathy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ... I like that generalization. I've also been thinking that we really ought to just make 'v' in printf() a flag rather than a conversion: printf "%vd\n", $chars;# decimal printf "%vx\n", $chars;# hex printf "%vo\n",

RE: [ID 19991209.002] Not OK: perl 5.00563 on IP26-irix 6.5

1999-12-10 Thread paul . marquess
From: Andy Dougherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Helmut Jarausch wrote: I have Berkeley db-3.0.55 install und the Configure process does NOT install DB_File by default. Thanks to Helmut's patient experimenting, we