We're still very much on course for a release this week. I'm
happy with the state of PMCs and the state of the test coverage
for them - I'm OK with the fact that string-num is broken right
now because I expect a lot of work on strings in the next release
period. (Gotta get them encodings working,
While I'd like to use the current PMCs for Scheme atoms, they don't have the correct
behavior for use in Scheme. In any case, after I get finished with a reasonably clean
PerlArray implementation (hopefully this evening) I'll be developing SchemeAtom and
SchemeList types to support Scheme
At 12:01 PM 12/3/2001 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'd like to use the current PMCs for Scheme atoms, they don't have
the correct behavior for use in Scheme.
What're they missing?
Dan
--it's like
Hurm.
I realized the other day that I hadn't done -anything- with tcl since my
last post, which has to have been months ago.
Given sufficient documentation, I could be motivated to improve the
status of this interpreter (and throw it into cvs somewhere).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'd
Simon --
After I've done PerlUndef and the assembler patch, it would be hint
type=bigreally really great/hint if we had some interesting
examples using these PMCs; similarly, I'd like to know if the
maintainers of the little languages (Hey, Gregor, where did you
disappear to?)
I haven't
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:11:04PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
I'm in M^3 (Major Marketing Mode) right now
Using emacs doesn't necessarily help matters.
I've been following the list, but I'm not clear on the status of
PerlIntArray PMCs. In/out, ready/hold-off?
Waiting for 0.0.4.
--
When
Simon --
I'm in M^3 (Major Marketing Mode) right now
Using emacs doesn't necessarily help matters.
I'm a vi partisan myself. I'm intrigued by emacs, and I've even
tried it, but I just haven't been able to justify learning another
operating system when all I need is an editor :) Seriously,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:44:22PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
If you think I'm missing the point/boat in some way, by all means slide
me a clue.
Hell no. The less work needs doing before 0.0.3 the better. :) Jako's
just fine, but as you're the language designer I wanted to make sure
you
Simon --
If you think I'm missing the point/boat in some way, by all means slide
me a clue.
Hell no. The less work needs doing before 0.0.3 the better. :) Jako's
just fine, but as you're the language designer
Cool! I'm a language designer! :) Although, I'm not really sure Jako is
much
