On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 17:57:32 PDT Parrot Raiser wrote:
> This isn't a request for a feature, merely a thought experiment. We're
> still in the phase where it's more important to ensure that existing
> features work properly than add new ones.
>
> How difficult would it be to include a
Forgot to send this to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alex Elsayed eternal...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Ideas for a Object-Belongs-to-Thread threading model
To: Daniel Ruoso dan...@ruoso.com
You may find interesting a paper
While lurking in IRC, I've seen several discussions of what CPAN 6 should
look like. Honestly, wayland76++'s idea for packaging seems the best to me.
Most of the suggestions so far, especially those based on alien, apt, yum,
or other existing package managers have a few major problems:
* Alien
On Friday 29 May 2009 1:51:40 am Mark Overmeer wrote:
I would really like to see a split in terminology being used for the
various seperate problems. The traditional confusion about what CPAN is:
an archive or an install tool. Package manager discussions are in the
process AFTER the install
I believe he is arguing that whatever we end up doing needs to make it
easy for an external package-manager to find out what files CPAN6.pm
is going to install, and where, and what the dependencies were (both
Perl and system libraries). So that the various distributions can
make native
I know that Rakudo is not the official implementation. The problem is
that you misunderstood my post. I did not say to distribute PIR to the
exclusion of Perl source. You know that I was replying to Larry's
comment that he supported the notion of distributing binaries. Surely
you didn't think
While lurking in IRC, I've seen several discussions of what CPAN 6 should
look like. Honestly, wayland76++'s idea for packaging seems the best to me.
Most of the suggestions so far, especially those based on alien, apt, yum,
or other existing package managers have a few major problems:
* Alien
On Thursday 28 May 2009 4:04:28 pm Daniel Carrera wrote:
* We were mainly looking at Alien as a source of Perl code we could borrow.
Ah, I was lumping it in with the previous proposals to actually use .deb as
the official P6 package format. My mistake.
* The point of wayland76's proposal was
On Thursday 28 May 2009 4:22:00 pm Larry Wall wrote:
I support the notion of distributing binaries because nobody's gonna
want to chew up their phone's battery doing unnecessary compiles. The
ecology of computing devices is different from ten years ago.
I agree. My ideal situation would be
On Thursday 28 May 2009 4:54:50 pm Daniel Carrera wrote:
On the other hand, distributing Parrot bytecode (or PIR, or PASM) seems
fine. But I don't know what to suggest for modules that require a C
compiler.
The problem with that is that Rakudo isn't the Official impelentation, and
never will
10 matches
Mail list logo
