over. Hopefully you
will find the sweet spot - I sure hope you do.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:25:42 Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
I could take a month's sabbatical from my day job for $5000 without losing
insurance coverage or other benefits. That's slightly more than Audrey's
$100/day, I
efficient way to accomplish that goal.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
not had a chance to look at Flavio's links yet. Since no one who
actually knows rules seemed to be inspired to write an example for me - I
will *eventually* figure it out on my own and post back to the list as an
FYI.
Paul Seamons
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
be run in Perl 5 today
without needing Pugs or Parrot.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 4/4/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:16:23AM -0400, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
Junctions are not intended for that use. We have Sets for that now.
Ok. So this will work out of the box if you use the right tool. Cool.
The cabal already decided once
the repository
to the public http://use.perl.org/~nicholas/journal/24649 but is anyone else
working on the project? With the excitement of Perl6, Parrot, and Pugs I
wonder if Ponie is being neglected.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
to the
minute facts concerning the project.
Juerd
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 10/24/05, Joshua Gatcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
This really isn't a fear as much as it is a complaint. It has to do with
design decisions and the list.
Perl 5 was my rewrite of Perl. I
(insert undefs as needed)
-error (blow up if the lists are not equal in size)
etc
Juerd
Just my 2 cents from the peanut gallery.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
the op in.
Michele
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 6/17/05, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:56:50AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
:
: my $x = 3;
: my $y = \$x;
: say $y + 10;
: $y++;
: say $y;
: say $x;
:
I suspect people will find that counterintuitive. A more consistent
the
'packed' warnings/strictures pragma, and stick it the right place.
The patch to S09 has me stumped.
Is there any other reference material I can use to put together solid
frameworks that are closely representative to what @larry might
produce?
Pm
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
with a volunteer to act as the approving
authority.
Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
docs and be a pioneer.
Pm
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 6/10/05, Joshua Gatcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
docs and be a pioneer.
Ok, are there any guidelines for what should and should not be put
forward
and leaving
the hard choices for doing the right thing up to you all. Whatever
the right thing is, will there be a way to do what my code snippet
showed?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
but forget it ever
happened, and 1 would be an outright failure.
Ok - so could someone set me straight?
What should that code snippet do? Would it do anything different if
Int had been int?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
and non-mutator versions of chomp (and
other functions) have been kicked around the list.
Any definitive word yet?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
can
change.
sub some_rourtine {
state $foo = 42;
return $foo++;
}
My apologies if this has been previously discussed or is documented
somewhere. I am still playing catch up. Ok, ok - it's true - I am
looking for a little instant gratification.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So without asking for S17 in its entirety to be written, is it
possible to get a synopsis of how p6 will do coroutines? I ask
because after reading Dan's What the heck is: a coroutine
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok - this isn't what I was expecting at all. That doesn't make it a
bad thing. Given something that looks a lot more like a typical
coroutine:
sub example is coroutine {
yield 1
answered the questions enough times in p5 circles
though, it would be nice to have a real simple easy answer for p6.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
, if anything, is the proper way
to do what I want. The worst that could happen is that I find out
there isn't a way to get a what matched from an any() eq any()
comparison.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
{ ... }
is what I think it might be modeling it after the for
loop, but the closest thing I see for while is:
while =$*IN - $line {...}
I am happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
--- Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb accidentally introduced a dependency
on
Config::IniFiles. Since it is implemented in pure
perl he offered to
add it to the repository. Warnock applies.
http://xrl.us/div3
In the note offering to fix it, I also listed numerous
27 matches
Mail list logo
