Dave Storrs said:
> On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> > >> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
> > >>
> > >> $foo = new Bar
> > >> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
> > >>
> > >> and on the other end
> > >>
> > >> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
> > >> $foo->bar;
> > >>
> > >> It will work i
On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> >> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
> >>
> >> $foo = new Bar
> >> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
> >>
> >> and on the other end
> >>
> >> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
> >> $foo->bar;
> >>
> >> It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Dan Brian wrote:
> Another snippet from the .NET whitepaper:
>
>
> Everyone believes the Web will evolve, but for that evolution to be
> truly empowering for developers, businesses, and consumers, a radical new
> vision is needed. Microsoft's
>> You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
>>
>> $foo = new Bar
>> store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
>>
>> and on the other end
>>
>> $foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
>> $foo->bar;
>>
>> It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
DS> Right, but I want it to work if you don't...
Then mayb
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> You are saying that the Clippy wasn't originally and truly annoying? :-)
Annoying enough to spawn vigor!
http://www.red-bean.com/~joelh/vigor/
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl
It's certainly a mistake to say "the goals of .NET", as if
they were a monolithic whole.
But the point is, some of the (technical) goals of .NET are
worthy, if not the slightest bit original; and so it should
not be a shame if some of Perl6's goals were collinear
with th
the more likely culprit, especially when a solution is
proposed as new and innovative, when it usually isn't.
Another snippet from the .NET whitepaper:
Everyone believes the Web will evolve, but for that evolution to be
truly empowering for developers, businesses, and consumers, a radical new
> -Original Message-
> From: Jarkko Hietaniemi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:26 PM
> To: David Grove
> Cc: Perl 6 Language Mailing List
> Subject: Re: .NET
>
>
> (still waiting
> > for "something original for a change&
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:22:26PM -0400, David Grove wrote:
> > > am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> > > Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> > > . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
> >
> > That's
> > am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> > Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> > . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
>
> That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
> The goals of .NET are not evi
At 09:30 PM 5/2/2001 +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>DS> At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >> David Grove wrote:
> >> > distributed objects,
> >>
> >> I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
>
>DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
>
>DS>$f
DS> At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>> David Grove wrote:
>> > distributed objects,
>>
>> I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS>$foo = new Bar;
DS>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS> and on
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'd like to be able to do:
>$foo = new Bar;
>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
> and on the other end do:
>$foo = unserialize();
>$foo->bar();
I personally am a big fan of Obliq semantics.
It's something I'd really like to see in perl.
--
John Porter
It's so my
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS>$foo = new Bar;
DS>print SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS> and on the other end do:
DS>$foo = unserialize();
DS>$foo->bar();
DS> I don't know that
At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>David Grove wrote:
> > distributed objects,
>
>I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
$foo = new Bar;
print SOCKET serialze($foo);
and on the other end do:
$foo
David Grove wrote:
> am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
> Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
> . . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
The goals of .NET are not evil in and
David Grove writes:
: Larry, et. al.: Is this similarity on purpose?
Yes, but only becase .NET is a VM, not because it's from MicroSoft.
The basic goal is to have a Perl VM that can sit easily on other VMs,
whether .NET's or Java's or our own. Another example of competing
by coo
I've been recently looking over the specification for C# and the .NET
platform (and falling for very little of the verbage: almost every line of
the first chapter of book I'm reading contains at least one oxymoron), and
am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Willy wrote:
> Does anyone know how can i
[snip]
> How can i do??
You cannot do this in perl6 because perl6 does not yet exist.
Please do not abuse this mailing list with off-topic questions.
Thank you.
--
Tad McClellan
Does anyone know how can i use Net::Ping in a CGI without having security problems??
It tells me that "icmp ping requires root privileges". But if set the "uid" bit it
tells me "insecure $ENV". How can i do??
Willy
http://members.xoom.it/willy73
20 matches
Mail list logo
