Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-11 Thread Jose Celestino
On Seg, 2009-08-10 at 22:06 -0500, raiph mellor wrote: > > Rakudo Zengi would be the most (in)appropriate, I think. > This latter point is the most exciting for me. "What is Rakudo Star? > Well, it's..." > A Beatles drummer ? -- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt ---

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-11 Thread jesse
Perhaps we could name the incomplete releases "Rakudo Bikeshed". Each release could be named after a popular color of bikeshed. The first one should definitely be called "Rakudo White Bikeshed". -j

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-11 Thread Carl Mäsak
raiph (>), Larry (>>): >> Rakudo Zengi would be the most (in)appropriate, I think. > > Why do I get the sense that some in the community are suffering siege > mentality? ;) > > I had thought of things like Zen, Zero, Catalyst, etc. > > But I love * | Star | Whatever. I love: >  o  The word Star, re

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread raiph mellor
> Rakudo Zengi would be the most (in)appropriate, I think. Why do I get the sense that some in the community are suffering siege mentality? ;) I had thought of things like Zen, Zero, Catalyst, etc. But I love * | Star | Whatever. I love: o The word Star, regardless of its connection with Perl

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread Larry Wall
Rakudo Zengi would be the most (in)appropriate, I think. Larry

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread jason switzer
Since I don't know anything about nuclear power plants, I think the BikeShed should be painted blue and called "Rakudo Whatever" or just "Rakudo". -Jason "s1n" Switzer

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread Mark J. Reed
Given the Japanese behind the name Rakudo, "rakudone" looks like a question: "Rakudo, right?" Beats "rakuod", though. On 8/10/09, James Fuller wrote: > how about > > 'raku' > > then the final version could be called > > 'rakudone' > > Jim Fuller > -- Sent from my mobile device Mark J. Reed

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread James Fuller
how about 'raku' then the final version could be called 'rakudone' Jim Fuller

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread Matthew Walton
0 Aug 2009 07:36:52 -0400 > Subject: Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite? > To: Gabor Szabo > > That has the same problem as lots of other themes - it puts a hard > limit on the number of releases before the One True Rakudo. > Maybe you could call it Zeno's Camel (project motto: &quo

Fwd: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread Mark J. Reed
Wrong reply button... -- Forwarded message -- From: "Mark J. Reed" Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:36:52 -0400 Subject: Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite? To: Gabor Szabo That has the same problem as lots of other themes - it puts a hard limit on the number of releases b

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-10 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:35:42PM -0600, David Green wrote: >> On 2009-Aug-9, at 3:57 pm, Tim Bunce wrote: >>> Perhaps it's worth asking what we might call the release after that >>> one. >>> "Rakudo not-quite-so-lite"? >> >> Rakudo ** (

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:35:42PM -0600, David Green wrote: > On 2009-Aug-9, at 3:57 pm, Tim Bunce wrote: >> Perhaps it's worth asking what we might call the release after that >> one. >> "Rakudo not-quite-so-lite"? > > Rakudo ** (aka "Rakudo Exponentiation")? Though I think Patrick is > opti

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread David Green
On 2009-Aug-9, at 6:30 am, Richard Hainsworth wrote: Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that its a sub-set of of Perl6. I like "*"... it has more personality than "lite". (Or even "light".) Though since it's a subset, we could always call it "Rakudo ⊂"! On 2009-

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a > > > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? > > > > Hmmm, that's a very reasonable name. Over the past few days I've > > become a

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:19:44AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is in

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Henry Baragar
Ruby anyone? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rake_(software). Henry On August 9, 2009 11:44:24 am Austin Hastings wrote: > How about "Rake"? > > =Austin > > Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > > > Since R

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Austin Hastings
How about "Rake"? =Austin Richard Hainsworth wrote: Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of Rakudo, a suggestion: Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? Its just

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Kyle Hasselbacher
Rakudo Light Rakudo Star Light Rakudo Rock Star Rakudo Hard Rock Rakudo Play Hard Rakudo Play Just musing...

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Ra

Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of Rakudo, a suggestion: Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that