On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
You are saying that the Clippy wasn't originally and truly annoying? :-)
Annoying enough to spawn vigor!
http://www.red-bean.com/~joelh/vigor/
--
Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6
You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
$foo = new Bar
store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
and on the other end
$foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
$foo-bar;
It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
DS Right, but I want it to work if you don't...
Then maybe SOAP::Lite? SOAP
On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
$foo = new Bar
store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
and on the other end
$foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
$foo-bar;
It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
DS Right, but I want it to
Dave Storrs said:
On 3 May 2001, Ilya Martynov wrote:
You can serialize/deserilize object with Storable
$foo = new Bar
store_fd $foo, \*SOCKET;
and on the other end
$foo = retrieve_fd \*SOCKET;
$foo-bar;
It will work if you have Bar module on both ends.
DS
David Grove writes:
: Larry, et. al.: Is this similarity on purpose?
Yes, but only becase .NET is a VM, not because it's from MicroSoft.
The basic goal is to have a Perl VM that can sit easily on other VMs,
whether .NET's or Java's or our own. Another example of competing
by cooperating, which
David Grove wrote:
am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
. . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
The goals of .NET are not evil in and of themselves, you
DS == Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS$foo = new Bar;
DSprint SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS and on the other end do:
DS$foo = unserialize(SOCKET);
DS$foo-bar();
DS I don't know that much has
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'd like to be able to do:
$foo = new Bar;
print SOCKET serialze($foo);
and on the other end do:
$foo = unserialize(SOCKET);
$foo-bar();
I personally am a big fan of Obliq semantics.
It's something I'd really like to see in perl.
--
John Porter
It's so
DS At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
David Grove wrote:
distributed objects,
I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
DS I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS$foo = new Bar;
DSprint SOCKET serialze($foo);
DS and on the other
At 09:30 PM 5/2/2001 +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
DS At 12:54 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, John Porter wrote:
David Grove wrote:
distributed objects,
I don't recall discussion of this wrt perl6, frankly.
DS I've mumbled about it on and off. I'd like to be able to do:
DS$foo = new Bar;
DS
am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
. . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
The goals of .NET are not evil in and of themselves, you know.
Depends
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:22:26PM -0400, David Grove wrote:
am seeing some similarities between some of the proposed goals of
Perl 6 and the .NET platform.
. . . many things in .NET have been discussed similarly here.
That's because .NET attempts to address real-world issues.
The
-Original Message-
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:26 PM
To: David Grove
Cc: Perl 6 Language Mailing List
Subject: Re: .NET
(still waiting
for something original for a change).
You are saying that the Clippy wasn't
Don't Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You
http://joel.editthispage.com/stories/storyReader$320
This is a really good article. The quotes from MS and Sun whitepapers are
living proof that rarely are superior technical means being espoused.
Superior sales are the more likely culprit,
It's certainly a mistake to say the goals of .NET, as if
they were a monolithic whole.
But the point is, some of the (technical) goals of .NET are
worthy, if not the slightest bit original; and so it should
not be a shame if some of Perl6's goals were collinear
with them. And I hope that ends
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Willy wrote:
Does anyone know how can i
[snip]
How can i do??
You cannot do this in perl6 because perl6 does not yet exist.
Please do not abuse this mailing list with off-topic questions.
Thank you.
--
Tad McClellan
16 matches
Mail list logo
