On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 02:24:13PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
> * perl6-stdlib
> * perl6-build
> Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current form?
Well I thonk that there should eventually be a perl6-stdlib, but
I think more nee
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:38:27PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 02:24 PM 5/27/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> >I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
> > * perl6-stdlib
> > * perl6-build
> >Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current for
At 02:24 PM 5/27/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Bryan C. Warnock writes:
>I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
> * perl6-stdlib
> * perl6-build
>Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current form?
Got me, as I'm not on either set.
>It looks like the perl6-internals-
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> perl6-all - Current mega-subscription list. (What mailing lists does this
> cover, and how is that determined as lists come and go?) In use.
perl6-all is subscribed to all other perl6-.*@perl.org lists.
> perl6-language-unlink - Originally chai
On Sunday 27 May 2001 06:27 pm, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> perl6-all is subscribed to all other perl6-.*@perl.org lists.
I guess I was curious as to if that was done programmatically or via policy.
No big deal.
> > Michael Schwern's perl-qa is also on the list, and seems to be included
> > in pe
Bryan C Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> perl6-language-datetime - Originally chaired by Russ Allbery. Date &
> time handling. Freeze. Last post was 30 Sep.
[...]
> The ones marked as 'Freeze' have a chance to be reusued later on to
> convert the Apocalypses to PDDs and to fill in the g
On Sunday 27 May 2001 04:24 pm, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'm all for removing the inactive mailing lists, those that you say
> "could be recycled" or "freeze". If they're needed for implementation
> work later, we can recreate them at that time. If they have no
> specific task to accomplish, t
Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> What are we going to do with the myriad mailing lists the RFC process
> spawned? Are they going to be recycled come design/implementation time, or
> are they closed/dead/gone. http://dev.perl.org/lists has them all listed as
> "current" (even though deadlines ex
