What I mean is that if rakudo 2016.02, 2016.03, etc are released, I can
still do
rakudobrew build moar 2016.01.1
to get the rakudo that is bundled in the Rakudo Star 2016.01 release.
--Brock
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> On 02/06/2016 12:37 AM, Brock Wilcox wrote:
On 02/06/2016 12:37 AM, Brock Wilcox wrote:
Also note that in my listing I installed a specific rakudo release, the
one that is included in the star tarball. That way further rakudo
releases are irrelevant.
There's a contradiction in terms here: if there were no Rakudo releases,
you couldn't s
Also note that in my listing I installed a specific rakudo release, the one
that is included in the star tarball. That way further rakudo releases are
irrelevant.
On Feb 5, 2016 13:23, "Will Coleda" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Brandon Allbery
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:44
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Brock Wilcox
> wrote:
>>
>> I see Moritz replied to this also saying that the tarball is the way to
>> go. I'd love to know what I'm missing out on by doing it this way.
>
>
> Probably nothing right now.
>
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Brock Wilcox
wrote:
> I see Moritz replied to this also saying that the tarball is the way to
> go. I'd love to know what I'm missing out on by doing it this way.
>
Probably nothing right now.
The big issue will come later: rakudo HEAD will be working toward a v6
Hi,
On 02/04/2016 01:44 PM, Brock Wilcox wrote:
If my understanding is correct (might not be), the tarball should be
ALMOST equivalent to:
rakudobrew build moar 2016.01.1 # Install rakudo 2016.01.1
rakudobrew global 2016.01.1 # Make this the default
rakudobrew build p
If my understanding is correct (might not be), the tarball should be ALMOST
equivalent to:
rakudobrew build moar 2016.01.1 # Install rakudo 2016.01.1
rakudobrew global 2016.01.1 # Make this the default
rakudobrew build panda # Build panda for this rakudo
pa
On 02/04/2016 01:26 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
On 02/03/2016 10:48 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:30 PM, James E Keenan
wrote:
I am evidently confused as to the relationship, if any, between the
'rakudobrew' utility and the Rakudo::Star distribution.
In short: rakudo
On 02/03/2016 10:48 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:30 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
I am evidently confused as to the relationship, if any, between the
'rakudobrew' utility and the Rakudo::Star distribution.
In short: rakudobrew is for the folks who want to track the rapid
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:30 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> I am evidently confused as to the relationship, if any, between the
> 'rakudobrew' utility and the Rakudo::Star distribution.
In short: rakudobrew is for the folks who want to track the rapid
development of Rakudo. Star is for folks who w
I am evidently confused as to the relationship, if any, between the
'rakudobrew' utility and the Rakudo::Star distribution.
Several weeks ago, when it became apparent that there would be delays in
the release of a Rakudo Star distribution with the "Christmas" release
in it, I executed the foll
11 matches
Mail list logo
