On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Robert Strahl via perl6-users <
perl6-users@perl.org> wrote:
> I don't understand why some people feel so strongly that one-liners should
> be strict. That would undermine what a one-liner is — a quick way to get
> something done. I use perl5 one-liners very frequen
02.09.2015, 16:42, "Robert Strahl via perl6-users" :
> I don't understand why some people feel so strongly that one-liners should
> be strict. That would undermine what a one-liner is — a quick way to get
> something done. I use perl5 one-liners very frequently for text processing,
> especial
I don't understand why some people feel so strongly that one-liners should
be strict. That would undermine what a one-liner is — a quick way to get
something done. I use perl5 one-liners very frequently for text processing,
especially when stringing / piping together shell code. When I need to
re-u
This is actually bad decision. If I'm concerned with *my* one-liner I'll use
-Mstrict and all would be great.
On the other hand, most of the time one-liners use one or two variables. Now,
how difficult is for human to track these two?
ps. -M-strict (no strict) is not valid command line option, s
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:48:07PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Good news! I just pushed a change (with backing from other core
> developers) that makes -e strict by default!
awesome! thank you Carl!
--
Marc Chantreux (eiro on github and freenode)
http://eiro.github.com/
http://eiro.github.com/a
Oh dear... can we get non-strict for one liners with -E then? I admit it
isn't an issue for me at the moment, as I do my one liners in perl5
currently
Maybe I need to think functionally, so variable declaration isn't an issue
at all
-y
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Mori
Moritz (>>), Tux (>):
>> I could continue with other Perl 5 deficiencies (no strict by default,
>
> Using strict *STILL* is not enabled by default for perl6
> one-liners either:
>
> $ perl6 -e'my Int $this = 1; $thıs++; say $this;'
> 1
> $ perl6 -Mstrict -e'my Int $this = 1; $thıs++; say $this;'
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35:27AM -0400, yary wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> >complete different usage but it would be nice to have a flag for "use
> >strict" both in perl5 and 6
>
> /me nominates -W as "a bigger -w" .. oh wait, -W already exists as a
> depreci
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
>complete different usage but it would be nice to have a flag for "use
>strict" both in perl5 and 6
/me nominates -W as "a bigger -w" .. oh wait, -W already exists as a
depreciated-in-my-view perl5 flag.
In that case, I also like "-E" as "ru
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:00:09PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > It used to be, but that was not according to spec. FROGGS++ implemented
> > the lax mode, which is enabled by default in one-liners. Perhaps TimToady
> > wants to invoke rule #2 on this.
> > Personally, I use an alias that has ‘
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> It used to be, but that was not according to spec. FROGGS++ implemented
> the lax mode, which is enabled by default in one-liners. Perhaps TimToady
> wants to invoke rule #2 on this.
>
> Personally, I use an alias that has ‘-M strict
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 12:18, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:26:23 +0200, Moritz Lenz
> wrote:
>
>> I could continue with other Perl 5 deficiencies (no strict by default,
>
> Using strict *STILL* is not enabled by default for perl6
> one-liners either:
It used to be, but that
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:18:46PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> $ perl6 -e'my Int $this = 1; $thıs++; say $this;'
> 1
> $ perl6 -Mstrict -e'my Int $this = 1; $thıs++; say $this;'
> ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling -e
> Variable '$thıs' is not declared. Did you mean '$this'?
> at -e:1
> -->
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:26:23 +0200, Moritz Lenz
wrote:
> I could continue with other Perl 5 deficiencies (no strict by default,
Using strict *STILL* is not enabled by default for perl6
one-liners either:
$ perl6 -e'my Int $this = 1; $thıs++; say $this;'
1
$ perl6 -Mstrict -e'my Int $this = 1; $
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.08.2015 14:12, Tom Browder wrote:
>>
>> I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but
>> they all seem to be lists that intermix features with varying degrees of
>> value to "ordinary" Perl 5 users. If one
Hi,
On 11.08.2015 14:12, Tom Browder wrote:
I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but
they all seem to be lists that intermix features with varying degrees of
value to "ordinary" Perl 5 users. If one wants to sell long-time Perl 5
users (already using the latest Perl
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Fagyal Csongor
wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:12:00AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
>>> I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but they
>>> all seem to be lists that intermix features with varying degrees of value
>>> to "ordinary" Perl
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:12:00AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but they
all seem to be lists that intermix features with varying degrees of value
to "ordinary" Perl 5 users. If one wants to sell long-time Perl 5 users
(already u
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Kamil Kułaga wrote:
> One thing that was not mentioned already is using Rat instead of
> standard floating point number. It prevents many silly mistakes
> especially when counting money.
Thanks, Kamil.
-Tom
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:00 AM, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:41:21 -0400, "David H. Adler"
...
> *THE* killer feature that will be seen by all beginning perl6
> programmers is its awesome error messages. It is a shame that
...
Thanks!
-Tom
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Built-in facilities for the language to parse, transform and extend
...
Thanks, Andrew.
-Tom
One thing that was not mentioned already is using Rat instead of
standard floating point number. It prevents many silly mistakes
especially when counting money.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but they
> all se
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:41:21 -0400, "David H. Adler"
wrote:
> > The reason for my request is to help with a better introduction in my
> > modest draft tutorial on converting Perl 5 to Perl 6 code at the Perl
> > Monastery. I am comfortable with the example code I use there (which is
> > not curr
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:12:00AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> I have seen several lists of new Perl 6 features (versus Perl 5) but they
> all seem to be lists that intermix features with varying degrees of value
> to "ordinary" Perl 5 users. If one wants to sell long-time Perl 5 users
> (already
Built-in facilities for the language to parse, transform and extend
itself (std grammar, macros).
Prospect of multiple back-ends (compile to dotnet or LLVM targets like
Javascript).
Feel like you're living in the future (Perl6 has been in the future
for so long now).
On 11 August 2015 at 21:42, To
25 matches
Mail list logo
