Thanks a lot, Jon, for your reply.
> The only one that I'm aware of is found here [1]. But it
> seems hard to get any other information about this stemmer.
Yes, it definitely seems so. The only Farsi stemmer I've been aware of
myself is http://www.isri.unlv.edu/publications/isripub/Taghva2003-0
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 11:40, Omid K. Rad wrote:
> I was rather disappointed when I was told that FarsiWeb is
> not interested in Microsoft .NET technology at all. Even though I value
> all the great achievements that FarsiWeb has found, I personally believe
> that resolving Persian computing issues
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 20:05, C Bobroff wrote:
> > About your suggestion, however, we (i.e. our team) have no idea about
> > Afghan and Tajik languages.
> It's all one language, different conventions.
For example, Tajiki is written in the Cyrillic alphabet instead of
Arabic. ;)
roozbeh
_
There is a debate story by BBC Persian on the Internet and the Persian
Langauge here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/interactivity/debate/story/2004/04/040428_mf_bt_weblanguage.shtml
roozbeh
___
PersianComputing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lis
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:06, C Bobroff wrote:
> OK, but kindly don't involve Roozbeh in any flamefests until AFTER he's
> done with the fonts.
Not much has happened with the fonts since last year (1382), and the
latest version is 0.4. BTW, we need volunteers for tracking bugs in the
fonts.
As fo
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 07:00:31AM -0700, C Bobroff wrote:
> The problem here is that you're receiving the Daily Digest form of the
> list so you're mixing and matching two different topics. Possibly
> three with the Outlook question that also crept in.
Not only that, but also you are screwing my
Nice examples of abbreviations/shorthands/whatever:
* The first page of Mosahab Persian Encyclopedia (first published in
1345/1966), about the abbreviations used in the encyclopedia, showing
different methods of Persian abbreviation (127 KiB):
http://www.farsiweb.info/misc/mosahab-abbr.pn
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> Not much has happened with the fonts since last year (1382), and the
> latest version is 0.4. BTW, we need volunteers for tracking bugs in the
> fonts.
Sorry to hear that. Can you release the latest if there have been any
improvements? Maybe I coul
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Masoud Sharbiani wrote:
> Not only that, but also you are screwing my mailer's threaded mail reading.
> Please don't do that.
I'm sure it was merely a subconscious attempt to seek out the
perfect abbreviation for Dushanbe, *Monday* Bazaar and capital of
Tajikistan :)
-Conni
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> For example, Tajiki is written in the Cyrillic alphabet instead of
> Arabic. ;)
Yeah, well, since I found out you can't actually type it unless you
buy those stand-alone programs (without the source code!), I'm
going to cite the Tajik [1] example ev
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/interactivity/debate/story/2004/04/040428_mf_bt_weblanguage.shtml
Can you give an example of "haa-ye havvaz instead of kasra." I can't
think how that situation could come up although I'm sure it's obvious.
-Connie
--- Ehsan Akhgari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded this package, and looked into it. It
> seem to be useful for my
> job. However, this is the first time I'm hearing of
> PC-Kimmo, so I was kind
> of lost when trying to figure out the whole thing.
> I was wonderring if you
> can provid
Dear Behdad, Roozbeh, Connie,
Thanks for your replies and explaining me. First of all, Iâm sorry if you found my
last post antagonistic in anyway. Iâm not expecting FarsiWeb anything more than what
they are doing (I donât see myself in that stance either).
All I wanted to say is donât avoid so
<>
Hello every body, especially my friends at FarsiWeb,
I'm trying to point out some things here (even though you might already
know) about .NET and our project.
For your information:
The .NET Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) and the C# programming
language were submitted to ECMA and ISO/I
The main problem with the fonts right now are:
* The lack line height data.
* The size does not match of the MS fonts. (so not to the
Latin fonts).
* A few of fonts have bitmaps added. Those bitmaps should be
removed.
* There's a known problem on LCDs, but that's another story
perhaps.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, C Bobroff wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>
> > For example, Tajiki is written in the Cyrillic alphabet instead of
> > Arabic. ;)
>
> [1] The English word is Tajik (and sometimes Tadzhik) but not Tajiki. (I
> also only found this out recently!)
I guess
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Perhaps we should add Tajik vs. Tajiki to the list of wars ;).
Good idea!
Merriam-Webster even has "Irani" as an English word in case you need more
suggestions for your list.
I'm sticking with the Oxford English Dictionary...
-Connie
___
Dear Connie (et al),
It's very easy to type Tajik using a "Phonetic" (i.e., mnemonic) Cyrillic
keyboard. I wrote a Keyman keyboard driver for Kazakh that should include
all those Cyrillic fancy characters needed for Tajik. Want to try it?
Best regards,
Peter E. Hauer
Linguasoft
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Linguasoft wrote:
> It's very easy to type Tajik using a "Phonetic" (i.e., mnemonic) Cyrillic
> keyboard.
With which font though? I could only find hacked fonts.
-Connie
___
PersianComputing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://l
19 matches
Mail list logo
