Re: [pgadmin-hackers] i18n online documentation
Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] i18n online documentation Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:04:43 +0100 De: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk A: Guillaume Lelarge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED], -Original Message- From: Guillaume Lelarge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 May 2006 22:00 To: Dave Page Cc: Raphaël Enrici; PgAdmin Hackers Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] i18n online documentation Yes, you're right. I was thinking of an old installer I used to download nigthly builds of mozilla. It was working on windows only. Sorry about this... Don't apologise - just keep the ideas coming :-) Separate downloaders/installers integrated in the app are not my cup of tea. However, for such case we may keep the idea of a language pack downloader which could install the language pack in the ~/.pgadmin3_dir/. This would not clash with an external packaging if the app takes care of looking for the language packs in different locations: from the most general path (system path) to the most particular one (user path). I would package pgadmin3-i18n separately or as an addon. Just my 0,01 euro cent. Cheers, Raph P.S. Something else Dave, in misc.cpp, pgAdmin is looking for ..hhp and not .hhp, is it normal or is it a typo? Index: utils/misc.cpp === --- utils/misc.cpp (revision 5144) +++ utils/misc.cpp (working copy) @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ firstCall=false; wxString helpdir=docPath + wxT(/) + settings-GetCanonicalLanguage(); -if (!wxFile::Exists(helpdir + wxT(/pgadmin3..hhp)) +if (!wxFile::Exists(helpdir + wxT(/pgadmin3.hhp)) #if defined(__WXMSW__) || wxUSE_LIBMSPACK !wxFile::Exists(helpdir + wxT(/pgadmin3.chm)) #endif ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
[pgadmin-hackers] Tr: Re: pgAdmin 3 bug
Message réexpédié Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:42:24 -0300 De: Juan Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: pgAdmin 3 bug Raphaël Enrici wrote: Hello, Juan Pablo wrote: Hello, i dont know if you are the right person to report a bug, but im using the debian package... Well, it's always preferred to post to pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org :) When making a backup of a database and clicking the ... buton to browse for the filename, there is no way to write the file name, the dialog that appears is for selecting existing files and not for creating one. It is a bug concerning the wx in debian, i also saw this in other program and the fix was quite simple. Can you point me to a bug report concerning this? Was the fix you are talking about included in wx for Debian or was it a change to the app suffering the bug? The program in question is Kicad, a program for electronics pcb, the only little problem is that the mantainer dosnt follow any single convention for development... y can point you to the message #395 of the users group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-users/ but it dosnt help. You may want to send a mail to the author for help, but good luck! I think he changed the app. Saludos, Juan. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet?
Dave, can you apply the following patch to the trunk ? This is the patch from Tomasz with blind corrections from my part. (not tested but should be ok, I'll use it to provide 1.4.0 beta1 package) Cheers, Raphaël Message d'origine De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet? Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:46:10 +0200 Hi Tomasz, Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet? De: Tomasz Rybak [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:24:33 +0200 Dnia 03-10-2005, pon o godzinie 18:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa³(a): Hi Tomasz, Dave and friends, first day to my new job and first day with an access to the net since a long time. Good luck with new job. thanks, I'll try to keep the luck with me. :) Tomasz, if you have some time to produce a merge between what you provided and what I've fixed in official debian I'd appreciate your help now I particularly think to the pgagent part of the package which was not taken in consideration in 1.2.2 and also the i18n relocation. OK. Here are changes I made, applied to revision 4490. They are mostly changes made by you in official Debian package, but I made few additional. I had a quick look to your changes and it seems quite good, although we must change some of them. Comments follow. For changelog, I put 1.4.0, because as I understand, we're trying to be ready for 1.4 release; I also put you name, as author of these changes. Feel free to put mine, if it's more appropriate. 1.4.0 is ok but the package version should not be -1. -1 is reserved for the first upload to official Debian. Unofficial packages should never use version number greater or equal to 1. For unofficial releases I generally use something like -0.1, -0.2,... Take a look to the beginning of the changelog you will see what we did with Andreas Tille before the first upload to Debian. That's a good example (at least a functionnal one). Concerning my name as the author, you should definitely put yours (I'll correct this when providing a version for the svn [surely tomorrow]) That's your work and the least we can do is that you get your name somewhere to thank you for your contribution. In rules, line 16, instead of _pgsql_inc:=/usr/include/postgresql -I./include I put calling of pg_config; such behaviour was mentioned in changelog for libpq-dev 8.0.3-13 as more proper now. yeah, alright with this. In fact that's what I ripped from Ubuntu for official 1.2.2. So, this one is definitely ok. I also created new variable CPPFLAGS, where I put -I./include taken from _pgsql_inc. Previous situation resulted in warnings from configure script, because instead of putting -I into _pgsql_inc, it was passed to script as parameter, which wasn't sure what to do with that. pgAdmin was being built successfully, but I decided to get rid of this warning. I also had to change a bit calling configure script in line 50, and add CPPFLAGS to it. Ok, I'll take a look at this. Maybe we can definitely remove that old -I./include after all... I also changed directory from ui to i18n line 106 of file rules. Perfect. Last change I made is adding pgagent and i18n files in pgadmin3.install. Ok. We'll need a man page for pgagent in a near future if we want to upload the things as is for Official Debian. I don't know if anybody has began to work on this... Dave ? Changelog in attachment. thanks for this diff. One remark. Why there are slony3 and slony3-data package? Both depend on each other, and from my point of view there is no need for them both; maybe it's good idea to merge them. However, I'm not experienced in Debian packages creating, and I don't know why split occurred, so I'll leave these two as they are, without changes. So it's up to you to decide what to do. I bet you refer to pgadmin3 and pgadmin3-data depending on each other. This was first introduced by Andreas Tille and discussed later with Peter Eisentraut and Noèl Koethe. In pgadmin3 package case, the reason for such a split is mainly due to the size of the documentation we provide. In this pgadmin3-data package we try to put all the nonarch dependent files and actually the PostgreSQL documentation. As it takes quite some disk space it's useful to split this for the following reason: - one non-arch package used by all the Debian archs prevents duplication of files and so save space on the Debian archive - as it saves disk space it also saves bandwidth between mirrors You may say that this not really interesting to do so for a compressed size of approx 1,5 Mo but if you multiply this by a large number of package it may be worth doing it. Last but not least, as pgadmin3-data contains documentation it should be named -doc and not -data, however, this documentation is usefull and/or needed for pgadmin3 to run
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet?
Hi Tomasz, Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet? De: Tomasz Rybak [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:24:33 +0200 Dnia 03-10-2005, pon o godzinie 18:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa³(a): Hi Tomasz, Dave and friends, first day to my new job and first day with an access to the net since a long time. Good luck with new job. thanks, I'll try to keep the luck with me. :) Tomasz, if you have some time to produce a merge between what you provided and what I've fixed in official debian I'd appreciate your help now I particularly think to the pgagent part of the package which was not taken in consideration in 1.2.2 and also the i18n relocation. OK. Here are changes I made, applied to revision 4490. They are mostly changes made by you in official Debian package, but I made few additional. I had a quick look to your changes and it seems quite good, although we must change some of them. Comments follow. For changelog, I put 1.4.0, because as I understand, we're trying to be ready for 1.4 release; I also put you name, as author of these changes. Feel free to put mine, if it's more appropriate. 1.4.0 is ok but the package version should not be -1. -1 is reserved for the first upload to official Debian. Unofficial packages should never use version number greater or equal to 1. For unofficial releases I generally use something like -0.1, -0.2,... Take a look to the beginning of the changelog you will see what we did with Andreas Tille before the first upload to Debian. That's a good example (at least a functionnal one). Concerning my name as the author, you should definitely put yours (I'll correct this when providing a version for the svn [surely tomorrow]) That's your work and the least we can do is that you get your name somewhere to thank you for your contribution. In rules, line 16, instead of _pgsql_inc:=/usr/include/postgresql -I./include I put calling of pg_config; such behaviour was mentioned in changelog for libpq-dev 8.0.3-13 as more proper now. yeah, alright with this. In fact that's what I ripped from Ubuntu for official 1.2.2. So, this one is definitely ok. I also created new variable CPPFLAGS, where I put -I./include taken from _pgsql_inc. Previous situation resulted in warnings from configure script, because instead of putting -I into _pgsql_inc, it was passed to script as parameter, which wasn't sure what to do with that. pgAdmin was being built successfully, but I decided to get rid of this warning. I also had to change a bit calling configure script in line 50, and add CPPFLAGS to it. Ok, I'll take a look at this. Maybe we can definitely remove that old -I./include after all... I also changed directory from ui to i18n line 106 of file rules. Perfect. Last change I made is adding pgagent and i18n files in pgadmin3.install. Ok. We'll need a man page for pgagent in a near future if we want to upload the things as is for Official Debian. I don't know if anybody has began to work on this... Dave ? Changelog in attachment. thanks for this diff. One remark. Why there are slony3 and slony3-data package? Both depend on each other, and from my point of view there is no need for them both; maybe it's good idea to merge them. However, I'm not experienced in Debian packages creating, and I don't know why split occurred, so I'll leave these two as they are, without changes. So it's up to you to decide what to do. I bet you refer to pgadmin3 and pgadmin3-data depending on each other. This was first introduced by Andreas Tille and discussed later with Peter Eisentraut and Noèl Koethe. In pgadmin3 package case, the reason for such a split is mainly due to the size of the documentation we provide. In this pgadmin3-data package we try to put all the nonarch dependent files and actually the PostgreSQL documentation. As it takes quite some disk space it's useful to split this for the following reason: - one non-arch package used by all the Debian archs prevents duplication of files and so save space on the Debian archive - as it saves disk space it also saves bandwidth between mirrors You may say that this not really interesting to do so for a compressed size of approx 1,5 Mo but if you multiply this by a large number of package it may be worth doing it. Last but not least, as pgadmin3-data contains documentation it should be named -doc and not -data, however, this documentation is usefull and/or needed for pgadmin3 to run well so it's not pure documentation and is mandatory to install. That's why we named it -data and not -doc and made the two packages depend exactly on each other. That's why it's like this and I won't change it. :) Thanks for your work, I'll provide an update tomorrow and ask Dave or Andreas (the Pflug one) to commit it. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9'
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet?
Hi Tomasz, Dave and friends, first day to my new job and first day with an access to the net since a long time. Tomasz, if you have some time to produce a merge between what you provided and what I've fixed in official debian I'd appreciate your help now I particularly think to the pgagent part of the package which was not taken in consideration in 1.2.2 and also the i18n relocation. To all french speackers around, I'd also appreciate any help with pga3 translation in french too. However, I plan to work on this until the end of the week if it's not too late. Cheers, Silent Raph. Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta yet? De: Tomasz Rybak [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:33:54 +0200 Dnia 30-09-2005, pi± o godzinie 16:03 +0100, Dave Page napisa³(a): Are we ready to roll a beta yet? Any more patches or commits outstanding? What's with Debian package files? In revision 4476 there are still old files. I've downloaded Debian's source of pgadmin3 1.2.2, and as Raphael's written, it's debian/ files are fixed. However, in svn files are still unfixed. -- Tomasz Rybak [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [solved] Pgadmin III connection error
Olimpio answered to me privately. Ho got his configuration up'n running after my last mail. Cheers, Raphaël Message d'origine Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:25:47 +0300 (EEST) De: Devrim Gunduz [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Olimpio [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: Pgadmin III connection error Hi, At last I was removed from all blacklists :-D (Reply below) On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Raphaël Enrici wrote: I'm running the Postgres 7.4.2 and the Pgadmin3 1.2.0 Beta 1 (5Nov 2004) on a Fedora Core 2 Kernel 2.6.5. Ok, I've CCed Devrim who is responsible of the fedora port The PGadmin3 connection to a remote machine (in other city) occurs OK. When I try to connect to a database (filling with 127.0.0.1 the field Address in the Add server PGadmin form) in the same machine in that PGadmin runs too, I receive the message : src/common/string.cpp(1060) : assert nLen != (size_t) - 1 It reminds me an old bug corrected in 1.2.2 and may be in 1.2.0 final which occured in particular locales when receiving an error message from the backend. We don't have packages for Red Hat 7.3 (he is using that). I believe it is time for OS upgrade :-) That might also be the reason , due to Wx problems. Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Biliþim Teknolojileri devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III 1.2.2 uploaded to debian/unstable
Dear friends, just to inform you that pgAdmin III 1.2.2 has been uploaded this morning to debian/unstable. We now only need to wait a bit for the website to update, the different arch to build and the mirrors to sync. I'd like to thank all the people whom were involved in getting a working package by sending bug reports, patches or just a small encouragement word. Regards, Raphaël P.S. I'll send updates to the svn repository asap. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pgadmin III connection error
Message d'origine Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:18:20 -0300 De: Olimpio [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Pgadmin III connection error Raphael, Hi, please post such question to pgadmin-support or pgadmin-hackers, there is more chance for you to get a rapid answer and others may benefit from such experience :). I'm trying to connect to a local database with pgadmin and receipt an error message : src/common/string.cpp(1060) : assert nLen != (size_t) - 1 Can you give more details please? Which version of pgAdmin are you using? What OS (I suppose Debian GNU/Linux as you asked me first)? What exact release of the OS? Can you configure pgAdmin to log debug information and provide the log file (beware to clean it from personnal informations if you care)? The database is running in the same machine I'm using the pgadmin III. So, it may be the pgAdmin 1.3.x release I made during summer with a connection to a local unix socket or are you trying to connect to 127.0.0.1 in tcp mode? Can you help me ? I bet everybody here would be glad to help :) Waiting for your updates concerning this. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] PGAdmin3 export query to file bug
Message d'origine Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:57:43 +0200 De: Jan Pekar [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org Sujet: [pgadmin-support] PGAdmin3 export query to file bug Hi, when I'm trying to export output of hand made query to file (icon on the top iconbar), OK button is always gray. When I have clean user configuration file, I can make export to file whenever I enter the file (I cannot use char /) and then I can press OK. But If I want to change some configuration (quoting..) OK became again gray (forewer). Sometimes export dialog displays debug (assert) error (wxWidgets Debug Alert - /src/common/string.cpp(1536): assert wxAssertFailure - wxString::Replace(): invalid parameter .). I think Export query to file is buggy and somebody should fix it. I'm using 1.2.2-0.2.sarge.1 debian version (from etch). Hi John, just can't reproduce this here on a debian/sarge. The packages uploaded to etch are the same one as sarge's (when I built them, sarge was just released and etch really near from it). Can you provide more details please? maybe a screenshot? The locale you are using, and maybe the pgadmin.log file after positionning a high level of debug. @hackers: does someone suffer about such a behaviour? Regards, Raphaël P.S. @Dave: sorry, I didn't wait for the OOB signal... ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debian download section website update.
Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debian download section website update. Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:04:42 +0100 De: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: PgAdmin Hackers pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Thanks, committed. Seems I missed something: Can you change However you can refer to a href=http://www.backports.org/; for the latest to However you can refer to a href=http://www.backports.org/;www.backports.org/a for the latest Thanks, Raphaël -Original Message- From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2005 20:35 To: Dave Page Cc: PgAdmin Hackers Subject: Debian download section website update. Hi Dave, Attached are two patches for the website: - websiteupdate.patch corrects the wxWidgets version on the website. I posted it some days ago but did not get any answer, feel free to reject it as I'm not sure of what I'm saying here. - websiteupdate_debian.patch corrects the download instructions for Debian packages as Sarge has now been released and become the new debian/stable distro (please note, that I wrote it 'blindly' as I had no host to check it easily). One RBS(tm) for you and Andreas. Regards, Raphaël... Waiting for an OOB signal before going to maintenance state :) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] big mistake : Deleted many files under
Message d'origine Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:39:47 +0300 (EEST) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] big mistake : Deleted many files under Hi, On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Andreas Pflug wrote: Seems you need a maintenance down time. Ask your wife for a proper shutdown procedure... flame Maybe Raphaël should stop using Debian unstable -- it sometimes fails ;) /flame :-) Debian, even unstable is more stable than I am and will ever be! :) Next one please... It's my day. ;) Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] big mistake : Deleted many files under developer.pgadm
Message d'origine Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:38:44 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] big mistake : Deleted many files under developer.pgadmin.org Raphaël Enrici wrote: Hello, Maybe my wife should not have powered me on so late :( While trying to upload my packages I did a big mistake and erased most of the archive (ftp/release directory) I'm about to leech ftp.fr.postgresql.org in case we don't have a backup of these data. Seems you need a maintenance down time. Ask your wife for a proper shutdown procedure... it's planned... My OOB (wife) is about to shut me down properly but she's waiting for two things: - recovery of my faults (she asked me not to go home without the situation being repaired to its initial state) - debian upload announce - patch for the website update After, she promissed... Immediate shutdown until you, Dave or a pgadmin-dev team member expressly asks for a power on. :) Cheers, Raphaël... didn't sleep very well ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] configure doesn't find my pgsql installation
Please, stay on the list. I have no time for this now, maybe you didn't enable unicode in the wx build. Someone has another idea ? Message d'origine Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:25:40 -0700 De: Linuxer Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] configure doesn't find my pgsql installation ok, tell us if you succeed or not. I successfully compiled and install wxGtk2, stc and ogl, and configure of pgadmin3 is ok, but when compiling, I got: then mv -f .deps/utffile.Tpo .deps/utffile.Po; else rm -f .deps/utffile.Tpo; exit 1; fi ../utils/utffile.cpp:20:2: error: #error utffile.cpp is implemented for unicode only. make[2]: *** [utffile.o] error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/kenny/download/pgadmin3/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kenny/download/pgadmin3' make: *** [all] error 2 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] pgadmin3 on Debian sarge
Message d'origine Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 04:15:45 -0700 (PDT) De: ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgadmin3 on Debian sarge A: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org Hi, I'll file a bug but since the package is in unstable it may take a long time before it's fixed. Meanwhile, what's the best way to go about installing pgadmin on Debian? wxWigets 2.6.0? pgadmin 1.2.2? Hi, I'm maintaining the Debian port and you are right that the package is in a broken state. This is mainly due to the wxWidget removal from unstable. I'm in contact with Ron Lee (wxWid maintainer) concerning this and I currently have no real idea of when a new wxWidget version will be uploaded to the archive. Concerning the other side of the question and the installation of pgadmin3 under Debian: we (the pgAdmin dev team) are on the way for a new 1.2.2 release and Debian packages are ready for it (both pga3 and private wxWidgets 2.6.x packages). However a recent bug in pga3/wxwid prevents it from being release [1]. If you really need a version, I'm about to re-upload a recent 1.3.x snapshot to the pgadmin apt repository but this is the dev branch not the stable one. Regards, Raphaël [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org/msg05809.html Thanks --- Dominik Blystak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, that's not an issue of pgadmin3 but from the deb package itself. You should contact the package maintainer of pgadmin3 for further information. regards, Dominik Blystak ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [SUMMARY] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
Message d'origine Copie à: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED], De: Adam H.Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [SUMMARY] Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:44:44 -0400 A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] On May 19, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote: To summarize : - we reject the configure.ac.patch which removed ENABLE_STATIC and should not have been included in trunk yet You mean reject my entire patch? It did much more than just remove ENABLE_STATIC, so it should not be rejected. Oh no! Your patch is _really_ fine and it does not remove ENABLE_STATIC from configure.ac! I meant to just reject the first one I sent yesterday evening concerning ENABLE_STATIC removal in configure.ac, not acinclude.m4. - we keep the latest acinclude_static.patch which re-add support for pg_static_build=yes + takes care of systems where wxWid installations are both static dynamic. We should add your patch to what is already in the trunk. So we all agree. Thank you Adam and Florian for this thread, it just reminds me we are alive :-) @Dave, can you apply the last patch I sent named acinclude_static.patch concerning acinclude.m4 and ignore my first one concerning the configure.ac? Thanks. (note that if you don't find it, I can repost it). All of this should be done on current trunk keeping Adam's work. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4
Message d'origine Copie à: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, De: Adam H.Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:14:47 -0400 A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. Nice catch. A small one compared to the work you did! The new acinclude.m4 works like a charm even with wxWid --flavour and even on pgAdmin REL-1_2_0_PATCHES branch. Do you think to any problem including it in 1.2.x branch apart from the fact that you invoke 'ogl' which is not required for 1.2.2 but does not harm the 1.2.x build ? Regards, Raphaël On May 19, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote: Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam H. Pendleton Sent: 18 May 2005 22:26 To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] New acinclude.m4 Attached is a new acinclude.m4, and a patch to our current acinclude, that relies on wx-config for all the flags. Gone is all the complicated stuff. The only thing this new acinclude doesn't do is warn about a missing stc or ogl. It will link against them, but if a user doesn't have them, their compile will fail. I'll be adding in stub programs to test for this in my next version. In the meantime, test and enjoy. Great, thanks Adam - committed. I have warning concerning ENABLE_STATIC in configure script. Shouldn't we also remove it crom configure.ac ? (patch attached). Regards, Raphaël Index: configure.ac === --- configure.ac(revision 4219) +++ configure.ac(working copy) @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ CHECK_WX_CONFIG_BINARY CHECK_PGSQL_INCLUDE ENABLE_DEBUG -ENABLE_STATIC CHECK_PGSQL CHECK_WXWINDOWS ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ?
Hi friends, wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of wx2.6 instead of 2.5... If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ? All of these questions to help me to take the good decision concerning pgAdmin III in official Debian. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
[pgadmin-hackers] new build dep summary ?
Hi friends, I plan to rework on Debian snapshots autobuilds this WE and to prevent (free)time lost, I'd like to get a small summary of steps needed to get the actual snapshot to build ok. Here is what I noticed in past threads: - wx 2.5.4 is now needed - wxUSE_DEPRECATED=0 instead of 1 (shall I modify this directly in the source file basic.h [-- not sure of the name, my memory is not young anymore] or is it adviced to pass this with CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS ?) - I presume there is no more libs to build than before but maybe I'm missing something ? anything else ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] upgrade to wx2.5.4
Message d'origine Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:47:15 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] upgrade to wx2.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Andreas and others, sorry for this long silence, I had much work (and studies) and no free time at all... I hope I'm back for some time (one exam on next wednesday and I should be back;p). Well, we'll try to accept your apologies generously...-) Thx for being so fine with me ;) I won't be able to work on this until (at least) next week. I can keep back the stuff for a while. Don't stop things for me. My Debian autobuilds have been done for a while. I'll upgrade my process in the same time I prepare this new stuff. Is wx2.5.4 frozen or is it still moving from day to day It's announced to be frozen (at least tagget in CVS), and I'm suggesting using the official snapshot. Seems the snapshot takes a while to hit the website. Ok, so I'll take a look at their website next week. Or maybe, you could drop a line when the snap appears. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] upgrade to wx2.5.4
Message d'origine Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:03:15 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] upgrade to wx2.5.4 Hi friends, Hi Andreas and others, sorry for this long silence, I had much work (and studies) and no free time at all... I hope I'm back for some time (one exam on next wednesday and I should be back;p). wx2.5.4 is somewhat incompatible to 2.5.3, regarding those casting orgies performed currently to call wxEvtHandler::Connect (e.g. in frmQuery). The new way using wxXXXEventHandler macros is much nicer, and we'll want to use the forthcoming wx2.6 anyway so we should upgrade to using 2.5.4 now on all build systems for 1.3. As soon as this is done, I'll upload the needed pgAdmin patches to use that. I won't be able to work on this until (at least) next week. Is wx2.5.4 frozen or is it still moving from day to day (I only see wx2.5.3 in the main download section of wxWid web site) ? If not frozen can one of you provide a snapshot known to work with the futur patched pga3? wx2.5.3 Debian packages did not enter testing and Ron is working hard on stabilising them. It seems I'm back on the way to provide my own ugly wxWid packages for pga3 1.3 releases... joke target=andreasDo you think I have nothing to do that you give me so much work? hu? ;)/joke Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
[pgadmin-hackers] FYI: pgAdmin III crashes with gtk-qt-engine enabled
Dear friends, just to let you know that a crash was reported at d.o. by Battara Samuelle. After investigation it seems to be linked to the gtk-qt-engine package under KDE. Step to reproduce - install gtk2-engines-gtk-qt - launch a kde session - run the GTK styles and fonts from the Appearance themes KDE menu and ask that GTK apps use kde style. - launch pgadmin3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pgadmin3 QPixmap: Invalid pixmap parameters QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin() QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin() Segmentation fault Full detail for this bug can be found at [1]. People responsible of gtk-qt-engine are aware of it and will look at it soon. This mail is just a summary so that people suffering from the same behaviour don't loose time looking at it. Regards, Raphaël [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=286436 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[pgadmin-hackers] Tr: pgAdmin III 1.2.0 Debian packages available
Sorry for the dup but I did not get this one back to me. Regards, Raphaël Message réexpédié Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:55:25 +0100 De: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: PgAdmin Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: pgAdmin III 1.2.0 Debian packages available -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I'm currently uploading pgAdmin III 1.2.0 (The final one!) debian packages. They should be available on your favorite PostgreSQL mirror as soon as mirror scripts will do their jobs. I only built debian/unstable but you can install them on debian/testing without installing much from unstable: the only package you should add (at the time of this writing) is libwxgtk2.5. Have fun, Raphaël P.S. To install these packages with apt, simply add a line like this to your sources.list: deb [MIRROR URL]/pgadmin3/release/debian unstable pgadmin Example for France for debian/unstable: deb ftp://ftp.fr.postgresql.org/pgadmin3/release/debian unstable pgadmin Then just type apt-get install pgadmin3 as root -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBthi9x3NpDPptARMRAmGkAJ94R2Ul9HJqz6VztvcwOFiY2usgVgCfRIu7 w2DbU0g4Snevh8ri12nbRdY= =PU2S -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout
Hi all, I've created a new ftp layout as discussed earlier. It can be reviewed at http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp2/ Thoughts/comments are welcome before I make it live. I haven't yet included the debian directories - Raph, can you help out with how they should be handled? ARGH! :) Debian repositories include each version and you can select a specific version to install if you don't want the latest one. The way the new dirs are organised will generate problems... People will need to change a line in their sources.list (the text file which tell where to find packages) each time a new version is released... I must think about it... Would it be possible to exclude debian dir from X.Y.Z dirs and symlink to ../debian ? Somehing like release/debian directory with packages release/1.0.x/debian - ../debian release/1.2.0/debian - ../debian And so on. don't know... let me think about it. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout
Message d'origine Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:04:30 - De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: pgadmin-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, I've created a new ftp layout as discussed earlier. It can be reviewed at http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp2/ Thoughts/comments are welcome before I make it live. less debian specific : why not adding a symlink like current or latest pointing to the latest release. release/current - v1.2.0 Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Arvin Sent: 03 December 2004 14:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout 2. I suggest that CURRENT_MAINTAINER files be added in the RPM-directories. The files should - apart from our names, etc. - contain a link to the relevant public key of the packager, i.e. http://troels.arvin.dk/pgp/ or http://www.gunduz.org/devrimgunduz.pgp.pub Yup, I just haven't got around to that yet (I only added them to the existing layout a couple of days ago). Can you explain something to me? Why don't you /simply/ upload your key to a keyserver? To me, gpg signing is efficient if (at least): - your key is available from a third party - your key is signed by someone you trust - you have all the required files to inform people the key has been compromised. IMHO, uploading your key to a public keyserver makes it mandatory for you to generate revocation certificates... Something you may not do if your key is not much distributed. - your private key is protected (I mean not on a host on the net) I bet we won't be able to sign each other but why not (Hey Dave, still ok for next summer holidays ? ;p) The only pub key I distribute in the deb repo is the key used to sign debian unofficial repository release files. This key is not on keyserver because it does not meet the above requirements. Having the key on a keyserver helps getting the pub keys rapidly as people first think the key is available on a keyserver(?). Thanks for teaching me, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
Message d'origine A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] De: Troels Arvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:44:31 +0100 On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:01:10 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: GPG signatures can be added to existing RPMs. See the --addsign rpm parameter. By the way: It would be nice if Dave's signature were used, as is the case for the source tar-balls. Dave: Do you have RPM on your system? - Could you add signatures to the RPM files? mmmh, I'm not sure it's a good solution... How could Dave be sure that the RPMs he is signing are really the right ones (thinking while writingA signed mail from Devrim with MD5s in it would suffice for Dave/thinking while writing). IMHO it's the packager responsibility to sign its own work and not the project coordinator responsibility. Devrim, maybe you should take time to sign major releases and let snapshots live unsigned. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded
Hi guys, it seems that (thanks to Ron) wxWidgets 2.5.3 as reached Debian/unstable. So, I think I'll try a proper build on top of these packages instead of trying a build on top of mine. If it works ok, these packages will be a first shot at trying to release proper pga3 packages which may enter in Debian/unstable and maybe then Debian/testing... So, you'll have to wait a little bit until I release 1.2.0 packages. Cheers, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:57:59 - De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Diego Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: PgAdmin Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Diego :-) /D From: Diego Gil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 November 2004 21:48 To: Dave Page Cc: PgAdmin Hackers Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.0 Gold uploaded Dave: src downloaded, configured and compiled OK in my Fedora Core 3 notebook. Some trivial tests like connecting, retrieving and updating data passed OK. Diego. El lun, 29-11-2004 a las 21:23 +, Dave Page escribió: I've uploaded 1.2.0 gold to http://developer.pgadmin.org/ftp/release/ in src, slack and win formats. Please could someone check them to make sure they look OK before we announce. On a related note, has anyone started work on a release announcement yet? If not, I'll write one up tomorrow. Finally, I'll branch CVS in a few minutes so Andreas can get his new code committed :-) /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation distribution
HI ANDREAS (you told to shout isn't it ?) ;) Message d'origine Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:08:14 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: pgadmin-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Documentation distribution In preparation for future updates, I created an updates directory, which will be accessible as www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/updates. Currently, it contains the latest version of the documentation, which should be used in distributions. Under *ix, we should stop distributing the documentation as separate files, but use pgadmin3.zip instead only to avoid confusion between the zipped and the multi-file version after automatic updates. The filename pgadmin3.zip is a consequence of the help system entry filename pgadmin3.hhp; if anybody thinks this name is a problem, please shout. Can you detail a little more please ? I don't measure the changes you described in your last mail. Does it mean we won't package anymore the PG doc pga3 doc as flat files and will just include a .zip ? Why not a tgz or whatever is closer to *nix ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug on debian... what's wrong with me ?
Message d'origine Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:07:31 +0200 (EET) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: PgAdmin Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug on debian... what's wrong with me ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Raphaël Enrici wrote: I can't login to the database with RC2 and Debian. I have a wxWidgets assert. Did I miss something or should I try the --disable-beer ? snip 2004-11-18 22:49:41 DEBUG : src/common/string.cpp(1060): assert nLen != (size_t)-1 failed. I get the same error if I use Turkish locale! I'd report it today but totally forgot it! I think there is a problem in wxWidgets, we should report this bug to them. mmmh be patient and have a beer :) I couldn't get a nor fr_FR nor C locale to work... How do you explain that it worked smoothly with pgA3 RC1 and not with RC2 ? Maybe it's a problem due to modifications in pgA3, maybe I should rebuild the entire wx based on the current libs on my host (they all were upgraded), myabe this is due to some changes elsewhere which break dialogues between pgA3 code and wxWid... Andreas ? Any idea ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC2 uploaded
Message d'origine Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:16:45 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC2 uploaded Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Dave Page wrote: I've tagged and uploaded RC2 in src, win32 ans slack91 formats. Can someone check these over before we post a release announce please? Built successfully on FC3 (with --disable-beer flag) Ah, if it builds even under aggravating circumstances, it must be ok... :-) mmmhh so, I'll build it on Debian tonight to validate such an assumption! ;) Maybe we should ask Adam to add this flag automagically when detecting the build is done on a FC host ? 8-)) Have No Beer! Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[pgadmin-hackers] Tr: Bug#281853: pgadmin3: support local connection?
Hi Ian, pgAdmin-Hackers, Message réexpédié Sujet: Bug#281853: pgadmin3: support local connection? De: Ian Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:21:53 -0800 Package: pgadmin3 Version: 1.0.2-7 Severity: wishlist It was hard to believe, but it seems pgadmin3 cannot connect to a postgres daemon which only listens on the local (a.k.a. Unix) socket. Could this be added please? that's a question I also asked to myself sometime ago... What's the reason we don't have a connection to a local socket in the connection dialog ? Is it because it would be Unix specific code and we don't want to make the app platform-specific (I mean no platform-specific functionalities) ? (just as we don't want to develop specific copy/paste/ole code for W32 users). Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Return of nightmare : Fedora Core 2 build problem :-)
[ ooops, did not CC to the list :) ] Hi Devrim! Message d'origine Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:12:09 +0200 (EET) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Return of nightmare : Fedora Core 2 build problem :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, As usual, I could not build pgadmin3 on Fedora Core 2. I'm using wxWidgets-pgAdmin3-20040907-2. Configured it with Nope, you need official wxGTK-2.5.3 available from wxwidgets.org. ../configure --enable-unicode --enable-debug --enable-mimetype=no - --enable-gui and also installed contrib/src/xrc and contrib/src/stc. not needed anymore. Take a look to the instructions on pga3 website. Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug#278644: pgadmin3: 'Log level' frame in
Hi Andreas, All of these themes show correctly, see the attached Gorilla snapshot. The cut-off characters are not theme dependent, it's a wx bug (which is hard to fix, we're waiting for 2.5.4++) So the question is: - same wx? (wxGTK-2.5.3 from wx website) Yes, I used this one to build pga3 deb packages but maybe I missed something... Remember the keyboard problems we had in the past which were due to a mistake I did in the build process. I'll try a calm and manual build this weekend and recheck twice this. What's strange is that Joahannes reported he has the same problem with pga3 1.0.2... - gtk problem? (2.4.10 for me) Here I have 2.4.13. One more thing, did you use my package or one of your build to test the theme ? (if not my package, can you try it ? It may definitively condamn me as the guilty person in this story! ;p) Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug#278644: pgadmin3: 'Log level' frame in options dialog is empty
@Johannes, I'm CCing this to pgadmin-hackers as I'm lacking free time just right now. @hackers: It seems we have problems with some themes at least under Debian GNU/Linux: Can somebody on the list try to reproduce this ? Full detail can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/278644 Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: Bug#278644: pgadmin3: 'Log level' frame in options dialog is empty Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:18:14 +0200 De: Johannes Gijsbers [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:48:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you try to start with a fresh .pgadmin3 directory ? $ mv .pgadmin3 .pgadmin3.backupOfTheDay $ pgadmin3 You won't see your connections anymore as they are saved in the .pgadmin3 directory but I would be interested to know if this solves the logging panel display problem or not... Nope, this doesn't solve the problem. However, I had a hunch and tried changing my metacity theme. Strangely, some themes do show the frame's content (Simple, Crux, Default, Grand Canyon, Mist, Ocean Dream, Smokey Blue, Sphere Crystal, Traditional) but quite a few do not (Amaranth, Glider, Gorilla, Industrial, Lush, Nuvola, Wasp). So this might not be a pgadmin3 problem, but I haven't seen it in any other application... Cheers, Johannes ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Servers moving!
Hi Dave, Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Servers moving! Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:28:55 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, at the moment, the router config is exactly as it was on the previous connection (bar the IP addresses of course), and the firewall rules on the server itself are exactly the same, again, bar the IP addresses. I can't reproduce this delay from any of the postgresql.org servers (either those in Panama, or svr4 which is in the US), or my own connection at home. Is anyone else seeing this problem? yep. same problem from here. I'd bet on a reverse lookup from the server or something like this... Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 3 uploaded
Howdy! (--- (c) Ron ;p) Beta3 is now on ftp.postgresql.org in src, Windows and Slackware distros. It looks OK to me, but I'd appreciate some confirmation. cool, I'll take a look asap. Raphael, any chance of you working up some more release announcement magic (or are you too sleepy ;-) )? Depends on delay you want. Vera did not let me go to my bed last night and as I'm back to work, I'm quite out of order. So, if you need an announcement for tomorrow morning it's like I won't be able to do it. If you need it for next monday, why not :) Just let me know. Cheers, Sleepy-Raph ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for Beta-3?
Hi, Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for Beta-3? Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:19:39 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED], -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 October 2004 17:20 To: Dave Page; Raphaël Enrici; Adam H. Pendleton; pgadmin-hackers Subject: Ready for Beta-3? I changed both the MSW project file as well as acinclude.m4 to wxWidgets 2.5.3 now. On linux, the xrc library won't be linked explicitely any more, on win32 the wx directory is assumed to be at c:\wxWidgets-2.5.3. Website is updated too. Nightly builds should be updated. Are we ready to roll Beta-3 now? Think so - our libpq patch got applied so I'm happy. I'll get on it on Monday morning let's go for it, I didn't get time to package anything and so check if everything is ok width Debian but my smallest finger has told me someone else is using my preferred distro... :) Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III Release plan
Message d'origine Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 17:58:19 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III Release plan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't want to be too negative (IMHO the beta2 is ok) but we may have no bug report because of the lack of packages: I was not able too produce debian's ones at the moment (planned for this night if vera's ok with that) and it seems that neither FC/RH/SUSE nor BSD ones were produced... So we are only able to get a proper feedback for win32 slackware. IMHO not enough. I do partially agree. While most bugs are quite platform independent, we certainly should fix all package/platform related bugs before 1.2 release (should read all *known*, of course :-). Admittedly, I don't really know about the current sanity state of our packages. I've just finished the build for debian unstable and it built smoothly. While testing a bit, I remembered an idea I had but never dropped to the team, maybe not for this release but for the next one, could we add a feedback while connecting to a PostgreSQL host: if you try to connect to a non-existent server (server down for example), the timeout can be quite long to come and the app _seem_ to hang (it does not, it just lacks user feedback). It may be useful to the user to have a small window or whatever you prefer indicating that something is really going on and why not a n informational message with a small sentence or progress bar indicating the time to go before the tcp timeout. I'll build debian/testing packages tomorrow and upload the hole bunch of files a little bit after. Have a nice night! Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Meaning of Schedule and Step
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Arvin Sent: 01 October 2004 23:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Meaning of Schedule and Step I'm almost done with the Danish translation. I'm having trouble with the translation of Schedule and Step, though. I do know the general meaning of the terms, but I don't know what they mean in PostgreSQL context. Can someone explain? Hi, Schedule means calendar or clock against which something runs - for example, a schedule might be 'every Friday at 10AM'. Step (assuming this is coming from part of pgAgent) refers to a single part of a job: for example: Hi Troel, although Dave explanation are really clear maybe this can help you to know the way others translated these strings. Sor, here it is: in french I translated schedule by planification to give the notion of what you schedule... I tranlated Step as is : pas (something related to step by step, or more related to computer: the step run in a debugger) HTH. Raphaël Job 1 = Step 1: DELETE FROM TABLE WHERE ID 1000; Step 2: VACUUM ANALYZE; Step 3: CREATE INDEX... ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] keywords... Is it normal ?
Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] keywords... Is it normal ? De: Diego A. Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED], Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:28:41 -0300 Hi all, It seems that the only quoted types are : SET any bit char interval numeric time timestamp trigger unknown varchar Also add the user name in the grant statements. I've read some thread implying Andreas and quoted keywords. I think Andreas or Dave added such feature to prevent some misbehaviour while using reserved words in some conditions but I don't know/remember/understand the scope of these modifications. IMHO it should be reviewed as it breaks part of the tool. Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1
ooops did not CC to the list. Message d'origine Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:09:20 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seeing as the Unix build problems seem to have been mostly resolved, I intend to roll the beta1 source tarball this afternoon, workload permitting. Sorry for the stupid question but did you check the beta snap does not include the recent quoted type problem ? Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 rolled
Message d'origine Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:52:19 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 rolled Dave Page wrote: OK, beta 1 is rolled and released (at last), and available at ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/pgadmin3/beta/ I won't announce this one too loudly because of the known issue with quoting, however, it would still be useful if packagers could produce their builds if only to check the build environments still work. Well, if it's out we should announce it! This is a well-known bug, we can document it in BUGS.txt (hoping people read it before shouting...), but since this is out with pgsql-Beta2 we can't suppress it. Let Beta-1 be public, and in a week or two we prepare a Beta-2. Yup! Fully agree. Let's go for an announce. This will for sure give us a bunch of new tests... Let's give us a chance to correct possible new bug reports to get an even better beta2 :) Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 rolled
Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 rolled Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:26:34 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 September 2004 18:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Beta 1 rolled Yup! Fully agree. Let's go for an announce. This will for sure give us a bunch of new tests... Let's give us a chance to correct possible new bug reports to get an even better beta2 :) OK, do you fancy doing the announce Raphaël? fancy...now you propose, it just sounds exactly like fun sounds to you last night or the night before if you see what I mean ;) BTW, that would be an honor :) I'll think about the text and submit it to you for corrections until tonight. What do you think of adding a specific note directly in the announce concerning this bug we don't like ? Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Message d'origine Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:35:57 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to. I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, however I'm not convinced this is something that need holdup production of the source tarball. If anyone disagrees or has any other objections, please let me know ASAP. So, I SHOUT! :) Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once. As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much) and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian. FC2 should be ok now thanks to Diego and Devrim but we should document the way --with-wx* configure options work as it was just the way to call them which was not correct. Can we wait until the WE ? Thx. Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3+Fedora Core 2 status report
Message d'origine Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:53:43 +0300 (EEST) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: PgAdmin Hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3+Fedora Core 2 status report -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Diego A. Gil wrote: I still can't compile! :-( = if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. - -DDATA_DIR=\/usr/local/pgadmin3/share/pgadmin3/\ -Wall -g - -I../src/include -I../src/agent/include -I/usr/include -DSSL - -I/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-2.5 -I/usr/local/include/wx-2.5 - -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES - -I/usr/local/include/wx-2.5 - -DDATA_DIR=\/usr/local/pgadmin3/share/pgadmin3/\ -Wall -g - -I../src/include -I../src/agent/include -Wall -g -O0 -MT utffile.o -MD -MP - -MF .deps/utffile.Tpo -c -o utffile.o `test -f 'utils/utffile.cpp' || echo './'`utils/utffile.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/utffile.Tpo .deps/utffile.Po; else rm -f .deps/utffile.Tpo; exit 1; fi utils/utffile.cpp: In member function `off_t wxUtfFile::Read(wxString, long long int)': utils/utffile.cpp:86: error: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC( wxStringBuffer, char*, unsigned int)' /usr/local/include/wx-2.5/wx/strconv.h:46: error: candidates are: virtual size_t wxMBConv::MB2WC(wchar_t*, const char*, unsigned int) const Did you recheck you enabled unicode in the wxWidgets build ? Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta 1
Message d'origine Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:55:27 + De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta 1 Do you mean, you've already built it and you don't have any problem or you are about to build it ? In order to check wx status, I did rebuild it completely. No f problem. Didn't try any debian package. Ok, which compiler version ? which gtk lib versions ? Current debian unstable or not ? Can you send all the configure lines you gave ? Which wx snapshot release ? Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3+Fedora Core 2 status report
Message d'origine Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:53:27 +0300 (EEST) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3+Fedora Core 2 status report On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Dave Page wrote: snip What have you got in /usr/local/bin? [EMAIL PROTECTED] devrim]$ ls -al /usr/local/bin/ total 9692 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Sep 7 17:32 . drwxr-xr-x 18 root root4096 Aug 16 14:26 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jul 12 16:01 gmplayer - mplayer -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4591348 Jul 12 16:01 mencoder -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5191020 Jul 12 16:01 mplayer -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 50096 Jul 19 12:50 sabcmd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 952 Jul 19 12:50 sablot-config -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 15520 Jul 23 16:29 sim -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19797 Jul 23 16:43 simctrl lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Sep 7 17:32 wx-config - wx-config-2.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root4564 Sep 7 17:32 wx-config-2.5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 7 17:32 wxgtk2-2.5-config - wx-config Just another thing, (nothing to do with your current failure) shouldn't it be wxgtk2ud-2.5-config instead of wxgtk2-2.5-config ? To me, you forgot to enable unicode in you wxWidget build. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta 1
Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta 1 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:29:18 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2004 11:05 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready for beta 1 Dave Page wrote: Last patch, as in, we can start using cvs tip from now on? Today's wx CVS is fine for MSW and GTK. OSX testing should use that too. big :-) /big mmmh. I'll try this one then. Dave, concerning beta 1, we still have big problem with latest debian packages. The 'f' key is not working while in sql query window... :( (see martin's report on pgadmin-support concerning this). I don't know where to begin the lookup concerning this bug... Any idea ? Did someone try latest pgadmin3 snapshot on another linux distro please ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug#250991: pgadmin3: weird behaviour on connection
Message d'origine Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:15:23 +0200 De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug#250991: pgadmin3: weird behaviour on connection [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll also try to reproduce this at home (maybe tonight or so). pgadmin-hackers: can you have a look to what's described below (it's a debian bug report) and try to reproduce please ? Known problem, on the TODO list. oops :) Sorry I didn't look at it before forwarding to the list. Any plan on when this would be corrected ? I mean, is this a major evolution/new feature for an 1.2.x or is there a chance it will be corrected in the 1.0.x branch one day ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug#250991: pgadmin3: weird behaviour on connection abort
Hi Markus, nice to hear you again ;) my DSL connection is out of order since a few days. I'll work back on pgAdmin3 as soon as I'll be able to do so :) I'm cceing your mail to pgadmin-hackers list so that someone can begin an answer. Many mails were exchanged concerning connection loss, but AFAIR none on this particular topic. I'll also try to reproduce this at home (maybe tonight or so). pgadmin-hackers: can you have a look to what's described below (it's a debian bug report) and try to reproduce please ? Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: Bug#250991: pgadmin3: weird behaviour on connection abort Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:49:20 +0200 De: Markus Schaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: pgadmin3 Version: 1.0.2-5 Severity: minor Hi, Whenever pgadmin3 loses the connection to the postmaster (e. g. network problems or /etc/init.d/postgresql restart), it behaves rather weird, because klicks in the tree on the left can cause multiple error windows to pop up. (I counted up to 17 after a simple klick on a table!) All of those windows are identical, and only telling that there's no connection to the server. At least, I would appreciate having only a single error message popping up, and not more than a douzen one after another. The ideal solution, of course, would be a reconnect button in the error window that allows the user to seamlessly continue his work, without having to close the connection (which itsself causes a smaller bunch of error popups when klicking on the server object) and re-open it by hand. Thanks for your patience, Markus -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4-mm2-uli Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages pgadmin3 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.4.1-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-6 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.2.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.2.4-6The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.2.5-5Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libpq37.4.2-4Shared library libpq.so.3 for Post ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-2 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++51:3.3.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-2Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System protocol client li ii pgadmin3-data 1.0.2-5Graphical administration tool for ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pgadmin-hackers] debian packages daily builds out of order
Dear friends, FYI, my DSL connection is out of order since May 17 22H09 (french local time ;p)... So, Debian daily builds of pgA3 snapshots are unavailable since this date. I've contacted my provider and I'll post again when my host is back online. (hope this will come soon). Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Smoother PostgreSQL icons
Message d'origine De: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a KDE desktop, these new icons (the PNG ones) look perfect whereas the existing ones look terrible. If talking about the Debian package ones, they are the one distributed upstream, I needed to quickly resize them to be lintian clean. The fact is that the ones you proposed are smoother and look better, at least under my Linux Desktop. Perhaps we just need a broader collection of icons and the packager can choose which one is the most appropriate one. Why not, although I think we should all try to get something quite similar under all archs/OS so that users get the same reference in mind when invoking pgAdmin III. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Color
Message d'origine De: Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED], It is a thing due to the change in wxWindows..wxWidget (Scintilla). Probably, confusion will be caused for a while Thanks Hiroshi, I think I'll add this one to pgadmin3 1.0.2 Debian package. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows2.5 and pgadmin
Hi Ron! nice to read you! Just for information, we have added the build of our wxWidgets snapshot directly in the pgAdmin3 package and we link statically to it. This package has been uploaded to debian about one week ago (on Friday March 5) by Andreas Tille who sponsored the package (and also did really high quality corrections/improvments to it). As it is an initial upload I'm waiting for the ftpmasters guys to add it manually to the distribution and the wnpp bug should be closed automatically. Andreas, I added the wxWindows help crash patch to this package. If you want to have a look to the packages they can be found here: http://www.enrici.com/pgadmin/ Take 1.0.2-0.13 it has been uploaded as is (excluded the version change to 1.0.2-1) to debian. Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:42:46 +0100 De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: pgadmin-hackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows2.5 and pgadmin Ron wrote: Howdy, A little later tonight I should be uploading wx2.5.1.1 packages to experimental. Andreas, what is the current state of pgadmin regarding wx.. do you guys still need extra patches, if so what do we need to do to get them merged (to the satisfaction of everyone :) with mainstream wx -- and hence finally get pgadmin off the Debian wnpp list and into the archive proper. Ron Hi Ron, we still need patches. There are 3 patches pending, as old as July :-( There was quite some work done in wx, so I believe there might be some more patches necessary, or workarounds/modifications in the pgadmin3 code. Unfortunately, those 3 patches are not circumventable unless a vast amount of code (e.g. all controls) is duplicated in pgadmin3 code. Now that 2.5.1 has settled, I'll be upgrading our snapshot to that version in the next few weeks, and make pgadmin3 working with that (I promised that multiple times earlier, I know...). I'm still completely unfamiliar with the new wx' bakefile stuff, hopefully we can integrate it smoothly into pgadmin3 as an embedded package. As a vision (and to put some pressure on me), I'd like to have pgadmin3 Debian-ready and showing on Linuxtag. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] XWindows crashes
Hi Jean-Michel, The new Debian packages seem to work fine. When will these packages be pushed into unstable? I'm glad to read this! :) Wait a little for them to enter... It's on the way. Don't break my future surprise ;) On which version of wxWindows snapshot are the actual 1.0.2 rpms versions built ? Some remarks: - - Another bug concerning adding users is gone (it used to crash). nice too. We must be sure of this before claiming it's ok. - - Fonts do not display well as usual (see a screenshot: http://developer.pgadmin.org/jean-michel/screenshots/problem_font.png). I know this is another wx issue. s...t! Greg, and others suffering from these bugs, I'll post a cumulated patch describing all the steps I followed to build these debian packages. The only patch which is not a pure pgAdmin3 patch concerns wxWindows help crash posted by Andreas in late 2003. I hope these patches which are all backports from 1.1.0 snapshot will give birth to a 1.0.3 or something like this. I really hope we will be able to produce working rpms correcting this. Pushing this thread to pgadmin-hackers. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PhAdmin3
Hi Andreas, thank you for your mail and thank you for using pgAdmin3. pgAdmin3 is built against wxWindows 2.5.x with particular patches applied. These libs are not in Debian at the moment. During the end of last year Mickael Mesches suggested that we integrate wx build in the pgAdmin3 debian package itself. I didn't get time to finalise this piece of work but it's about to be done now (I mean I have something working, but I need to do some cleaning and testing before I submit it)... My debian Sponsor (V. Renardias) will have a look at it as soon as it is ready and this should then go into official debian. One more time, thank you for your support. Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:58:51 +0100 (CET) De: Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Raphael Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] PhAdmin3 Hello, thanks for buildig PgAdmin3 packages for Debian. Is there any reason to maintain a separate repository instead of integrating it into official Debian? Kind regards Andreas. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Seems they use 2.4.0... :(
Have a look to their makefile:
LIB_DEPENDS+= wx_gtk2_stc-2.4.0:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/wxgtk2-contrib
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-wx-config=wxgtk2-2.4-config
May be Hiroshi or Dave could contact the 'maintainer' to clarify the situation ?
MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Raphaël
Message d'origine
Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:11:12 -
De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February 2004 12:10
To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Le Mardi 3 Février 2004 12:37, Dave Page a écrit :
Did anyone know pgAdmin 3 was in the BSD ports collection?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/pgadmin3/
What wxGTK2 version are they using? Andreas patched version?
No idea, just spotted it whilst browsing the ports. I don't have BSD box to look at
it on right now.
Regards, Dave.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Refreshing removed object crashes pgadmin3
Dear Richard, Hiroshi, it seems that richard is using woody ( the debian stable release ). As I'm linking dynamically debian packages to postgre, I used the debian official postgresql package to build pgA3. I saw the thread between Jean Michel Pouré and Andreas Pflug last month concerning libpq issue (concluding to the necessity of a static linking of libpq) but did not get time to modify my packages. to pgadmin-hackers: Is it *really* a pre-req to use libpq =7.3 ? If yes, this a pure packaging issue we have here... I think I'll have to produce different packages for woody and for testing/unstable. I would like to continue dynamic linking for testing and unstable as it's debian way to do the things. Can others (on other distros) try to reproduce the bug signaled here ? To Richard: I wait a bit for answers from others but will try a particular build for woody with static linking against a postgresql backport... that's quite a lot of work, so you'll have to wait a little. Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine De: Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-support] Refreshing removed object crashes pgadmin3 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:09:55 +0900 Dear Richard. - Original Message - From: Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Refreshing removed object crashes pgadmin3 Package: pgadmin3 Version: 1.0.2-0.1 Severity: important (snip) ii libpgsql2 7.2.1-2woody4 Shared library libpq.so.2 for Post ''' Hmm.. Is PostgreSQL7.2.1 in your environment? It may be a problem he had libpq made as shared. pgAdmin3 requires libpq beyond PostgreSQL7.3. regards, Hiroshi Saito ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Refreshing removed object crashes pgadmin3
Message d'origine Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:13:54 +0100 De: Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-support] Refreshing removed object crashes pgadmin3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems there are at least 2 different debian packages of pgadmin3, both with the same name and version number, but different dependencies: In fact there should be three package with the same name and different dependencies. stable, testing, unstable correspond to the debian release you are using. As you are on a testing/unstable, you should definitely not use the stable repository but at least the testing or unstable. They are all build of the same source in different repositories. (it's longer explained at http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/download.ph Please, feel free to tell me if it's not clear enough). As you are using a mix between testing and unstable, your /etc/apt/sources.list should contain: deb ftp://ftp.eu.postgresql.org/pub/unix/db/postgresql/pgadmin3/release/debian testing pgadmin OR : deb ftp://ftp.eu.postgresql.org/pub/unix/db/postgresql/pgadmin3/release/debian unstable pgadmin (on a single line) The bug I originally reported (segfault when refreshing a removed object) is still there. Ok, that's what Andreas told, it seems to crash with a gtk environment but not on a win32 one... Andreas, will surely find a solution. It's not a debian specific issue. Thank you for your report, and feel free to contact me if I was not clear enough. Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1
Hi devrim, Message d'origine Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:20:26 +0200 (EET) De: Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Tha latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight. Are you doing some dynamic linking ? We should all do static linking against our wx snapshot. So, the wx rpms should not appear in install dependencies but just build-requires. Users should not install them, only developers or persons who want to build pgAdmin3 by themselves. If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :) Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Cannot Add user
Jean-Michel, could you try the following : - try another version of pga3 you can specify the snapshot version while installing with something like apt-get install pgadmin3 (=version_number) - try to rebuild the package on your host so that we can confirm we are not faced to an incompatibility with the version I used when I built the scan. Note that If you don't want to bother rebuilding all packages you can try the one shot package available here deb-src http://www.pgadmin.org/snapshots/linux/debian experimental/official pgadmin Then $ apt-get source pgadmin3 $ cd pgadmin3-1.1.0 $ dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc -rfakeroot This is based on 20031026 pga3 snap and wx 20031010-5 I will update my unstable build environment tonight. regards, Raphaël Message d'origine De: Jean-Michel POURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Cannot Add user Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:53:19 +0100 Dear friends, I am using the latest pgAdmin3 snapshot with PostgreSQL 7.4 beta 5 under Debian. Maybe this is not a recommanded configuration as pgAdmin3 was compiled against an old libpq and on my station libpq3 is installed. I cannot create a new user. The application crashes (reproducable). There is no special log. Can anyone reproduce the problem? Best regards, Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Cannot Add user
Hi Jean-Michel, Just for information, the experimental repository contains the wx snapshots that I use for daily pgadmin3 builds (this is documented). The repository I indicated in my previous mail contains the future offical package that will build independtly from an external wx (this is really new and not documented). regards, Raphaël Message d'origine De: Jean-Michel POURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Cannot Add user Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:55:32 +0100 Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 16:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Note that If you don't want to bother rebuilding all packages you can try the one shot package available here deb-src http://www.pgadmin.org/snapshots/linux/debian experimental/official pgadmin Dear Raphaël, I did not know there was an experimental reposirory for pgAdmin... Trying... Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Last night's build failed :-(
Hi Dave, Andreas talked about a patch to wxwindows concerning calendar May be you missed his mail ? Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Last night's build failed :-( Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:03:11 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DDATA_DIR=\/usr/share/pgadmin3/\ -Wall -g -I../src/include -I../src/agent/include -I/usr/local/pgsql/include -DSSL -I/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2ud-2.5 -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -I/usr/local//include -DDATA_DIR=\/usr/share/pgadmin3/\ -Wall -g -I../src/include -I../src/agent/include -Wall -g -O0 -MT calbox.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/calbox.Tpo \ -c -o calbox.o `test -f 'ui/calbox.cpp' || echo './'`ui/calbox.cpp; \ then mv .deps/calbox.Tpo .deps/calbox.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/calbox.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi /usr/local/include/wx/generic/calctrl.h: In member function `bool wxCalendarBox::Create(wxWindow*, int, const wxDateTime, const wxPoint, const wxSize, long int, const wxString)': /usr/local/include/wx/generic/calctrl.h:247: `wxControl* wxCalendarCtrl::GetYearControl() const' is private ui/calbox.cpp:107: within this context /usr/local/include/wx/generic/calctrl.h:246: `wxControl* wxCalendarCtrl::GetMonthControl() const' is private ui/calbox.cpp:139: within this context ui/calbox.cpp: In member function `void wxCalendarBox::OnText(wxCommandEvent)': ui/calbox.cpp:413: no matching function for call to `wxCalendarEvent::SetDate( wxDateTime)' make[2]: *** [calbox.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/pgadmin3/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/pgadmin3' make: *** [all] Error 2 /usr/bin/strip: src/pgadmin3: No such file or directory ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Impossible to compile pgAdmin3 snapshots
Jean-Michel, I finally got the build ok today on my debian host. I join Dave and think that you may have an old wxWindows (or may be just a part of it) installed on your system. regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Impossible to compile pgAdmin3 snapshots Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:47:36 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2003 21:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Impossible to compile pgAdmin3 snapshots Dear all, I installed wxWindows 20031010 patched version. pgAdmin3 snapshots does not compile with an include error: Works OK here. Have you tried cleaning up well and reinstalling wx? Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pga3 Query Builder
Hi Dave, FYI, this night snapshots didn't build automatically (I had no time to look at it, but some files may be missing). ui/frmMain.cpp:70:35: images/querybuilder.xpm: No such file or directory regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pga3 Query Builder Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 21:39:24 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 October 2003 16:37 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pga3 Query Builder - Double clicking columns opens the join dialogue. This appears to be because wxWindows detects the double click as a drag-drop, which then overrides the double click event. I'm not sure how to fix this - think it needs Andreas' talents to fix :-) I had a look at it. DD is implemented by hand using EVT_MOTION, which lacks control over mouse clicks (the control eats it, before we could handle it). I wonder why EVT_LIST_BEGIN_DRAG wasn't used for this. EVT_LISTBOX_DCLICK is used on myList, which is a wxListCtrl, not a wxListBox - no go. Hmm, well spotted! I'll keep playing with it - thanks for looking. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[pgadmin-hackers] web site correction
Hi Jean Michel, Surely a typo: I think that in home page and other pages with the comments in the left the last i should be a /i... The rest of the site stays in italic. I've no way to send you a patch now, but it's located here: br iOn the first day of public release, Friday 26th September, it may take a few hours to update download mirrors. brbrPlease be patient...i /div Best regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pgadmin-hackers] Frozen snapshots
Hi Dave, it seems that snapshots are frozen one more time (latest I can see is 20030912) . Any idea ? Regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Desktop integration
Dave, concerning this last point, let's stay as we are. I finally had a look to debian postgresql-client package and it creates a Databases entry in debian menu. So it seems to be the right place for debian menus at this time. I'll also have a look to gnome/kde/unified desktop specification and registered sections when I'll have the time for it... For the moment I'm building the beta2 :) Cheers, Raphaël Sounds good to me, but then may be we should leave it in tools instead of databases entry. Although I prefer Databases, tools is a section I found from a scratch install it was not the case of databases which I added by hand. What do you think ? Hmm, I have neither on KDE 3.1 on Slackware 9. Closest I have is Development. Thoughts anyone? Should it be standardised or distro specific? Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[pgadmin-hackers] website correction
Dear Jean-Michel, I noticed that everything concerning debian packages in the pgadmin3's download page (http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/download.php) was in bold fonts. After having a quick look to the html produced, it seems that there is a br just after my name instead of a dd (that's the only difference that I observed compared to the RPM section). Can you or someone on the list correct this. Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgA3 desktop integration
Thank you Andreas. I'll be out of my home for about 4 days, I'll continue my work on this when I'll be back. If there is any problem concerning debian packages until saturday, can you please tell people that my answer will surely lag. Regards, Raphaël Message d'origine Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:15:57 +0200 De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Raphaël Enrici [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgA3 desktop integration I added elephant48.png to cvs under include/images, which is the same image as used for the icon on win32. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 stops working when trying to access/show
Dear Christian, are you using pgadmin3's debian packages ? If yes, which one ? Stable / Testing / Unstable ? of course unstable .. ok, great. both are postgresql 7.3.3 If you suspect something concerning the debian package, I will have a look at this tonight. sorry cant compile from source .. ... some wxwindow xml include file is missing in debian which wxwindows ? official 2.4 ones or unofficial 2.5 that we provide and that is used to compile debian packages ? The 2.5 package we provide is broken (I'm correcting it) in the way that it conflicts with the official 2.4 without telling it in package specifications. If you are using the packages we provide, can you please tell me which files are missing so that I integrate them to our packages. Last stupid question : did you have a look to http://cvs.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pgadmin3/docs/en_US/snapshots.html concerning debian build ? Thanks and regards, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 stops working when trying to access/show
which wxwindows ? official 2.4 ones or unofficial 2.5 that we provide and that is used to compile debian packages ? the official one .. ok, so it is an unpatched 2.4. btw: the wrong wxwindows library(2.4) wouldn't interfere with my installed pgadmin3, would it? No, pgadmin3 as released for the moment is linked statically against our wxwindows 2.5. Andreas, do you have any idea concerning this problem ? Does anybody on the list can reproduce such problems with other linux distros ? Christian, I'll try to send you more precise informations concerning debian build so that you can try to build it by yourself... But I won't have time until tonight. Cheers, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build
Hi all, Message d'origine Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:09:57 +0200 De: Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copie à: Adam H. Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 21:45 To: Dave Page Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build Dave Page wrote: As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5 for. Nope. The dialog metrics are vastly improved in 2.5, so gtk really looks the same as win32. Most strings won't fit in gtk if 2.4 if used, the fonts are really messed up. Still, I wonder about this version discussion. AFAIR we simply have --with-wx, and evaluate the version that's stored there. Another point of note - from the reply Raphael got from his Debian packager friend it sounds like the wx CVS is currently being turned upside-down whilst they reorganise the structure. Looks like we're stuck with 2003-06-07. We need our own version at the moment, which may be based on 2003-06-07 or 2003-06-18, and has the additional wxString patch to support that's still open. here is what I'm planning to do concerning debian packages release and this wxWindows 2.5 problem : Woody debian stable release : as this the official release, we won't be able to integrate new software in it... So, I think we can release a package for this release (on snake) with a link on our own wx 2.5 package (I won't integrate wxPython which seems to be THE real problem at this time... pgadmin3 has nothing to do with it (?) ). These debian packages will be aptable from snake and its mirrors but no official debian repository. Testing and Unstable : we are obliged for the moment to link without unicode support and against wxWindows 2.4 + GTK 1.2 if we want to be able to integrate official debian repository. Ron Lee who is responsible of wxWindows debian packages will surely release a cvs snapshot package of 2.5 and I've asked him if it is possible to integrate unicode support. Experimental : here we can do about everything we want, so I I'll produce a wxWindows 2.5 with gtk2 and unicode in it specific to pgadmin3. Any suggestions concerning this is welcome! best, Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
