2012/8/23 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com writes:
I have a simple table of keys and values which periodically
receives updated values. It's desirable to keep older values
but, most of the time, we query only for the latest value of a
particular key.
CREATE
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:32:32AM +, Jason Dusek wrote:
2012/8/23 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com writes:
CREATE TABLE kv
( k bytea NOT NULL,
at timestamptz NOT NULL,
realm bytea NOT NULL,
v bytea NOT NULL );
CREATE INDEX ON kv
On 08/24/2012 12:34 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
you can't mix planned and unplanned statements together - think about
stored plans every time
Thanks Pavel and Jeff.
I can't say I fully understand the arguments, but I'll take it that
accepting cursors in CTEs or subqueries wouldn't make sense.
LDAP will be your best choice for SSO, Ubuntu Linux can authenticate against AD.
Also this is OS stuff not PostgreSQL, if you server is in production and you
can not handle this migration,
it is advisable that you subscribe for support on Ubuntu from canonical
Thanks,
Sunday Olutayo
Dear All
We try to install, several times, postgres version 8.4.12, each
installation was failed during the post-install step
displaying this error: (install-postgresql.log)
Executing cscript //NoLogo
F:\postgressql/installer/server/initcluster.vbs postgres postgres
F:\postgressql
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Segato Luca lseg...@prholding.it wrote:
** **
Dear All
We try to install, several times, postgres version 8.4.12, each
installation was failed during the “post-install step ”
displaying this error: (install-postgresql.log)
** **
BTW there are a much more short version of this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION int_equal(interval, interval) RETURNS boolean
IMMUTABLE STRICT LANGUAGE sql AS
'SELECT $1::text = $2::text';
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote:
Then maybe you should use
On 08/24/2012 06:10 PM, SUNDAY A. OLUTAYO wrote:
LDAP will be your best choice for SSO, Ubuntu Linux can authenticate against AD.
I'm not at all convinced by that. Active Directory functions as a
Kerberos KDC. Kerberos provides secure authentication and (unlike LDAP)
single sign-on.
In real world deployment, LDAP and Kerbero are often combined for
authentication and authorization.
The link below is a well documented howto:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SingleSignOn
Thanks,
Sunday Olutayo
- Original Message -
From: Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au
To:
Is there any way for me to control the name of the (unique or primary)
constraints that get created when doing a create table like parent-table
statement ?
I use this statement to create the new table in a different schema than the one
in which the parent-table lives, and I would like the
2012/8/24 Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au:
On 08/24/2012 12:34 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
you can't mix planned and unplanned statements together - think about
stored plans every time
Thanks Pavel and Jeff.
I can't say I fully understand the arguments, but I'll take it that
accepting
Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au writes:
I didn't find a reasonable way to simply fetch a cursor into a (possibly
temporary) table, like:
INSERT INTO sometable FETCH ALL FROM somecursor;
Why would you bother with a cursor, and not just INSERT ... SELECT
using the original query?
Putting a
Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org writes:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:32:32AM +, Jason Dusek wrote:
Why are the individual indices not useful? The tests that the
query does -- equality on key and realm and ordering on at --
are each supported by indices. Does it have to do with the
Hi Dinesh,
Managed to get this up and running...thanks!!
Regards
Hugh
From: dinesh kumar [mailto:dineshkuma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 August 2012 13:15
To: Loughrey, Hugh
Cc: Postgres General
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Check PostgreSQL status using MS-DOS bat file?
Hi ,
Dave's instructions are
On 23/08/12 11:06, Nick wrote:
I have a table with 40 million rows and haven't had any performance issues yet.
Are there any rules of thumb as to when a table starts getting too big?
For example, maybe if the index size is 6x the amount of ram, if the table is
10% of total disk space, etc?
Sometimes the server process crashes and restarts, usually when I run some
large calculations that eat up all available memory. Is there any way to
detect this and run a cleanup routine when it happens? Running 8.4 on
Ubuntu.
-- John
I have a temporal data question that may be much easier to handle in version
9.x but I am stuck on version 8.4.
One table has a time range that is implemented as start_time and end_time
columns of type TIMESTAMP with Timezone.
A second table has information that is needed to determine if there
EXT-Rothermel, Peter M peter.m.rother...@boeing.com wrote:
I have a temporal data question that may be much easier to handle
in version 9.x but I am stuck on version 8.4.
That is unfortunate. Getting this to work correctly in 8.4 will
probably be a lot more work than upgrading to 9.1 and
John D. West john.d.w...@asu.edu wrote:
Sometimes the server process crashes and restarts, usually when I
run some large calculations that eat up all available memory.
You might want to reconfigure to avoid that.
Is there any way to detect this and run a cleanup routine when it
happens?
Marcus' guide looks great.
So what's the pros/cons of using the Kerberos via GSSAPI method, rather than
going for the SingleSignOn method mentioned by Sunday?
From: SUNDAY A. OLUTAYO [olut...@sadeeb.com]
Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2012 12:00 a.m.
To:
Greetings all,
Having an issue with the pl/pgsql function below. I may or may not
make an update to a table in the first IF statement. However, whenever
an update is made, if the loop is continued then the update is not
committed.
Is it that whenever a loop is not completed rows aren't written?
Hi, I solved it. I had created a directory junction in default downloads
location to another directory in another drive. The installer was running
from there and giving this error. I just remembered and though to check it
from normal directory and yup, installer was running and installed fine and
I have various background processes outside of postgres that need to be
killed and restarted after the server reboots.
-- John
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov
wrote:
John D. West john.d.w...@asu.edu wrote:
Sometimes the server process
On 08/24/2012 03:46 PM, John D. West wrote:
I have various background processes outside of postgres that need to be
killed and restarted after the server reboots.
-- John
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov mailto:kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov
Hi pgsql-general,
Has anyone else ever noticed how slow it can be to rsync or tar a pgdata
directory with hundreds of thousands or millions of files? I thought this
could be done faster with a bit of concurrency, so I wrote a little tool
called fast-archiver to do so. My employer (Replicon) has
John D. West john.d.w...@asu.edu wrote:
I have various background processes outside of postgres that need
to be killed and restarted after the server reboots.
All of our applications are coded such that when they have an error
on a database connection, they check for a serialization failure
I *think* my independent processes are cleaning up in that they supposedly
abort themselves if they lose db connection, but on restart there is a
table of pid's I'd like to (1) make sure all of the processes are really
dead, killing any who aren't (2) reset flags in a table showing the status
of
27 matches
Mail list logo
