First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2021-02-05 Thread Tom Lane
See https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=805093113df3f09979cb0e55e857976aad77b8af Please send any corrections by Sunday. regards, tom lane

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-07 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 11/7/20 11:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra writes: >> On 11/7/20 3:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Do you have some suggested text? > >> I think this might work: > > I dunno ... given that we have zero field reports, I doubt this is > something we need to tell every BRIN user to do. The

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Tomas Vondra writes: > On 11/7/20 3:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Do you have some suggested text? > I think this might work: I dunno ... given that we have zero field reports, I doubt this is something we need to tell every BRIN user to do. The text I put in earlier today just recommends

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-07 Thread Tomas Vondra
Hi, On 11/7/20 3:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra writes: >> We should probably include instructions what to do about the BRIN >> data corruption fixed by 7577dd8480 - a query to list might be >> affected by the bug and should be rebuilt. > > Do you have some suggested text? > I think

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-06 Thread Tom Lane
Tomas Vondra writes: > We should probably include instructions what to do about the BRIN > data corruption fixed by 7577dd8480 - a query to list might be > affected by the bug and should be rebuilt. Do you have some suggested text? regards, tom lane

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-06 Thread Tomas Vondra
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:07:12 -0500 Tom Lane wrote: > See > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=c66a3225e07b5098a796f24588a6b81bfdedd2fd > > Please send any corrections by Sunday. > We should probably include instructions what to do about the BRIN data

First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2020-11-06 Thread Tom Lane
See https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=c66a3225e07b5098a796f24588a6b81bfdedd2fd Please send any corrections by Sunday. regards, tom lane

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-06 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 5/5/19 12:24 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 2:35 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> On 5/3/19 6:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> See >>> >>> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b3bce2017b15e05f000c3c5947653a3e2c5a29f >>> >>> Please send any corrections by

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 2:35 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 5/3/19 6:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > See > > > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b3bce2017b15e05f000c3c5947653a3e2c5a29f > > > > Please send any corrections by Sunday. > > Attached is a draft of the

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 5/3/19 6:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > See > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b3bce2017b15e05f000c3c5947653a3e2c5a29f > > Please send any corrections by Sunday. Attached is a draft of the press release to go out. Please let me know if there are any

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Munro writes: > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, I didn't really think it was worth distinguishing. If there >> is some more general term that covers both calls, maybe we should >> use that? > I would just do s/fsync/fsync and sync_file_range/. And I guess also >

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Gierth writes: > "Michael" == Michael Paquier writes: > Michael> I have noticed a typo: > Michael>Errors, such as lack of permissions to read the directory, > were not > Michael>detected or reported correctly; instead the code silently > acted as > Michael> -

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Andrew Gierth
> "Michael" == Michael Paquier writes: Michael> I have noticed a typo: Michael>Errors, such as lack of permissions to read the directory, were not Michael>detected or reported correctly; instead the code silently acted as Michael> - though the directory were

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-04 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 06:29:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Please send any corrections by Sunday. I have noticed a typo: --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ Branch: REL9_4_STABLE [81f5b3283] 2019-03-04 09:50:24 +0900 Errors,

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-03 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Munro writes: > > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane wrote: > > + Tolerate EINVAL and ENOSYS > > + error results, where appropriate, for fsync calls (Thomas Munro, > > + James Sewell) > > > Nit-picking: ENOSYS is for

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-03 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Munro writes: > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane wrote: > + Tolerate EINVAL and ENOSYS > + error results, where appropriate, for fsync calls (Thomas Munro, > + James Sewell) > Nit-picking: ENOSYS is for sync_file_range, EINVAL is for fsync. Yeah, I didn't really

Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up

2019-05-03 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane wrote: > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b3bce2017b15e05f000c3c5947653a3e2c5a29f > > Please send any corrections by Sunday. + Tolerate EINVAL and ENOSYS + error results, where appropriate, for fsync calls