> On 28 Jun 2025, at 05:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:45:58PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches
>> where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem
>> where injection preloading would be
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:45:58PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches
> where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem
> where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is
> available via hacks, just a li
> On 27 Jun 2025, at 14:25, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Thoughts or comments?
I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches where possible.
Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem where injection preloading
would be handy (though functionality is available via hac
