On 2023-11-15 11:02:19 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to
> > testwrap
> > indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a)
> > don't
> > need two test()
is a patch that does it that way.
From d58e65a71d2fab40ab22f047999efe06d96d8688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:00:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2] Explicitly skip TAP tests under Meson if disabled
If the tap_tests option is disabled under Meson, the TAP tests
Hi,
On 2023-11-06 17:46:23 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to
> > testwrap
> > indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a)
> > don't
> > need two test()
On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote:
I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to testwrap
indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a) don't
need two test() invocations, b) could still see the test name etc in the test
invocation.
Is
Hi,
On 2023-10-30 05:45:52 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Under Meson, it is not very easy to see if TAP tests have been enabled or
> disabled, if you rely on the default auto setting. You either need to
> carefully study the meson setup output, or you notice, what a minute, didn't
> there use
On 30.10.23 10:12, Tom Lane wrote:
+1 for counting such tests as "skipped" in the summary. -1 for
emitting a message per skipped test. If I'm intentionally not
running those tests, that would be very annoying noise, and
potentially would obscure messages I actually need to see.
In my usage,
Hi Peter,
You may find value in this Meson PR[0] adding a skip keyword argument to
Meson's test() function. From what I understand of the PR and your
issue, they seem related. If you could provide a comment describing why
this is valuable to you, it would be good to help the Meson
Aleksander Alekseev writes:
> Personally I like the change. It makes the output more explicit. In my
> use cases not running TAP tests typically is not something I want . So
> I would appreciate being warned with a long list of bright yellow
> "SKIP" messages. If I really want to skip TAP tests
Hi,
> Under Meson, it is not very easy to see if TAP tests have been enabled
> or disabled, if you rely on the default auto setting. You either need
> to carefully study the meson setup output, or you notice, what a minute,
> didn't there use to be like 250 tests, not only 80?
>
> I think it
obviously other implementations, such as using python, would also be
possible.)From 19e78e4c5a16337c0ac4e661beb4729505736016 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:32:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Explicitly skip TAP tests under Meson if disabled
If the tap_te
10 matches
Mail list logo
