On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com wrote:
1. Slave wants to be synchronous with master. Master wants replication on at
least one slave. They have this, and are happy.
2. For whatever reason, slave crashes or becomes unavailable.
3. Master notices no more
Sorry by mistake for below mail, I have not kept hackers in loop.
From: Amit Kapila [mailto:amit.kap...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:07 PM
To: 'Gurjeet Singh'
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes
without foreign key rebuilds
From:
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Farina
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:42 AM
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com
wrote:
1. Slave wants to be synchronous with master. Master wants
Hey all,
I've begun an implementation of the proposed HTTP API [1] (with some
changes) using node.js
The project lives at
https://github.com/bjornharrtell/postgresql-http-server and
basic functionality is in place.
Feedback appriciated!
[1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HTTP_API
Regards
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Farina
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:42 AM
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
I noticed today that has_language_privilege() returns incorrect answer
for non-superuser, e.g.:
8---
select has_language_privilege('nobody',
On 10.07.2012 02:33, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Hackers,
I've tested various opclasses for ranges (including currently in-core one
and my patches). I've looked into scholar papers for which datasets they
are using for testing. The lists below show kinds of datasets used in
papers.
Great!
Hi,
Attached please find a trivial patch for psql which adds a \n meta command
as a shortcut for typing set search_path =.
This allows you to navigate a database very quickly in psql as follows:
\dn
\n my_schema
\d
\d my_table
etc.
Not yet done: updating documentation (psql internal help,
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
When I worked on parametrised DO statement, I had to solve following issue:
DO currently is a utility command, not a query. Do you mean to change
that?
Also, did you think about a lambda construct, which is basically
allowing functions to be defined
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I think we want this. There is some discussion about how much overlap
it has with pgfincore, but I don't think there is an active proposal
to put that into contrib, so don't see that as blocking this.
It is my understanding that Cédric wants to propose
2012/7/10 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
When I worked on parametrised DO statement, I had to solve following issue:
DO currently is a utility command, not a query. Do you mean to change
that?
Also, did you think about a lambda
Hackers,
I stumbled across an initialization of a BlockNumber with InvalidBuffer,
which seems strange to me, as the values for invalid of the two types
are different, see attached patch.
In case the 'stack' argument passed to that function is not NULL, the
variable in question gets overridden
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 08:00:48PM -0700, David Kerr wrote:
On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Rsync is popular with Postgres users, but I don't understand how they
are using the default check mode (file size, modification time) to
synchronize shut-down data directories?
On 07/10/2012 01:11 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
So if I get this straight, what you are saying is be asynchronous
replication unless someone is around, in which case be synchronous
is the mode you want.
Er, no. I think I see where you might have gotten that, but no.
This is a pretty tricky
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com wrote:
Async is simply too slow for our OLTP system except for the disaster
recovery node, which isn't expected to carry on within seconds of the
primary's failure. I briefly considered sync mode when it appeared as a
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
I also attach various typo/grammar fixes.
In fact Robert's cleanup of the docs make that patch of yours not apply
anymore, and I think a part of it is maybe already fixed. Do you have
time to look at this with the new v1.8 patch that you will receive in a
Hi,
Attached please find a trivial patch for psql which adds a \n meta command
as a shortcut for typing set search_path =.
This allows you to use psql as follows:
\dn
\n my_schema
\d
\d my_table
etc.
Not yet done: updating documentation (psql internal help, psql man page,
main
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
I like the patch, as far as it goes. It's the natural addition to the
completions we already offer; compare the simplistic completion after WHERE.
Like Pavel and Robert, I think a delightful implementation of tab completion
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote:
All we need to do is allow swapping of pg_class.relfilenode of two indexes.
This will let the dependency entries stand as they are and allow us to drop
the bloated primary key index structure without having to rebuild
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
We could imagine several syntax to show up the idea, common keywords
here include LAMBDA, FLET or LABELS, but I think that expanding WITH
would be preferable for us.
WITH FUNCTION foo(param list) returns rettype language foo AS (
On 07/09/2012 05:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Total-consistency replication is what I think you want, that is, to
guarantee that at any given time a read query on the master will return
the same results as a read query on the standby. Heck, *most* people
would like to have that. You would also
2012/7/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
We could imagine several syntax to show up the idea, common keywords
here include LAMBDA, FLET or LABELS, but I think that expanding WITH
would be preferable for us.
WITH FUNCTION foo(param list) returns
On 10.07.2012 17:31, Shaun Thomas wrote:
On 07/09/2012 05:15 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
So I'm unclear on why sync rep would be faster than async rep given
that they use exactly the same mechanism. Explain?
Too many mental gymnastics. I get that async is faster than sync, but
the inconsistent
Greg Stark st...@mit.edu writes:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com wrote:
All we need to do is allow swapping of pg_class.relfilenode of two indexes.
Fwiw I don't like swapping relfilenodes on indexes the user created.
REINDEX currently does this but it's a
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
WITH FUNCTION foo(param list) returns rettype language foo AS (
definition here
)
query using foo() here;
I like this idea. This gets rid of both the how to pass parameters
and the how to return results issues that exist with DO, as
2012/7/10 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
WITH FUNCTION foo(param list) returns rettype language foo AS (
definition here
)
query using foo() here;
I like this idea. This gets rid of both the how to pass parameters
and the
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/7/10 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr:
I'm not sure I can understand the difference between that and the use
case for which you want to implement DO blocks with parameters.
this is similar to temporary functions - you need some
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Colin 't Hart co...@sharpheart.org wrote:
Attached please find a trivial patch for psql which adds a \n meta command
as a shortcut for typing set search_path =.
I think the use-case is a bit narrow: saving a few characters typing
on a command not everyone uses
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:56:50 -0400 2012:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/7/10 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr:
I'm not sure I can understand the difference between that and the use
case for which you want to implement DO blocks with
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The problem you describe is one of constraints and dependencies and
not one of indexes. It seems what you really want is a way to alter
foreign key dependencies to depend on a new index. Either an explicit
command that lets
On 07/10/2012 09:40 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
You are mistaken. It only guarantees that it's been sync'd to disk in
the standby, but if there are open snapshots or the system is simply
busy, it might takes minutes or more until the effects of that
transaction become visible.
Well, crap.
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:44:03 -0400 2012:
All of these things seem like ugly, hard-to-use kluges anyway (the
make-sure-the-indexes-match business is just as much of a PITA for the
DBA as it is for the system). What we really want is REINDEX
CONCURRENTLY.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com wrote:
On 07/10/2012 01:11 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
So if I get this straight, what you are saying is be asynchronous
replication unless someone is around, in which case be synchronous
is the mode you want.
Er, no. I
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:56:50 -0400 2012:
What's to solve? Presumably the WITH function name would take
precedence over anything in the catalogs, the same as WITH query names
take precedence over actual tables.
Hm,
I occasionally get questions about how to run pg_upgrade on log-shipping
standby servers. The attached documentation patch outlines how to do
it.
I don't think we can assume that because pg_upgrade was run on the
master and standby that they are binary identical, can we? Technically
the user
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Colin 't Hart co...@sharpheart.org wrote:
Attached please find a trivial patch for psql which adds a \n meta command
as a shortcut for typing set search_path =.
I think the use-case is a bit narrow: saving a few
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 10 10:44:03 -0400 2012:
What we really want is REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9961 ?
Hm ... that paper looks like something we might want to
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (xref linkend=warm-standby) can
+be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow
+writes, and after the upgrade it cannot be reused as a standby server.
+(Running commandrsync/
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (xref linkend=warm-standby) can
+be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow
+writes, and after the upgrade it cannot
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (xref linkend=warm-standby)
can
+be upgraded, the server must be in changed
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:00:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Colin 't Hart co...@sharpheart.org wrote:
Attached please find a trivial patch for psql which adds a \n
meta command as a shortcut for typing set
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:21:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (xref
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:21:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:26:22PM +0200, Colin 't Hart wrote:
On 10 July 2012 18:24, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:00:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Colin 't Hart
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:00:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
ISTM there was some discussion awhile back about user-definable
typing shortcuts in psql.
In some sense, we already have them:
Good point:
regression=# show search_path ;
search_path
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found several problems in pg_receivexlog, e.g., memory leaks,
file-descripter leaks, ..etc. The attached patch fixes these problems.
Shaun,
Too many mental gymnastics. I get that async is faster than sync, but
the inconsistent transactional state makes it *look* slower. If a
customer makes an order, but just happens to check that order state on
the secondary before it can catch up, that's a net loss. Like I said,
that's
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Testing maybe? I feel we have just avoided saying what you can and
can't do with the standbys and pg_upgrade, so I think we have to state
something. If we just want to say recreate, let's say that.
Well, the bottom line is
On 7/10/12 5:22 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I think we want this. There is some discussion about how much overlap
it has with pgfincore, but I don't think there is an active proposal
to put that into contrib, so don't see that as blocking this.
It is
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found several problems in pg_receivexlog, e.g., memory leaks,
file-descripter leaks, ..etc. The attached patch fixes these problems.
ISTM there are still some other problems in pg_receivexlog, so I'll
read it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Testing maybe? I feel we have just avoided saying what you can and
can't do with the standbys and pg_upgrade, so I think we have to state
something. If
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
rsync where and how? What are you actually trying to suggest people
do?
Updated docs attached.
I suggest just removing the rsync part completely. You're basically
saying you ca nset up a new standby after you're
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
... Could you crank up the log verbosity so we can get
file and line number, at least?
Here is what the increased verbosity reveals in aggregate. This
is about an 18-hour span, covering 12.5M transactions, on
version 8.3.18:
(13
Am 10.07.2012 18:44, schrieb Tom Lane:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:00:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
ISTM there was some discussion awhile back about user-definable
typing shortcuts in psql.
In some sense, we already have them:
Good point:
regression=#
On 7 July 2012 13:57, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my revision, I've just added a pre-declaration and removed the
dedicated header, which didn't make too much sense to me:
+ /* Pre-declare Relation, in order to avoid a build dependency on rel.h. */
+ typedef struct
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
rsync where and how? What are you actually trying to suggest people
do?
Updated docs attached.
I suggest just removing the rsync part completely.
Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of mar jul 10 14:56:40 -0400 2012:
On 7 July 2012 13:57, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define PG_DIAG_TRIGGER_SCHEMA 'h'
Not all appear to have a way of setting the value within the ereport
interface. For example, there
On 10 July 2012 20:28, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I think we should just define constants for the set of fields the patch
currently uses. When and if we later add new fields to other callsites,
we can define more constants.
Fair enough. Let's do that.
FWIW about the
Excerpts from Kyotaro HORIGUCHI's message of mar jul 03 04:59:38 -0400 2012:
Hello, Here is regression test runs on pg's also built with
cygwin-gcc and VC++.
The patches attached following,
- plperl_sql_ascii-4.patch : fix for pl/perl utf8 vs sql_ascii
-
Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of mar jul 10 15:54:59 -0400 2012:
On 10 July 2012 20:28, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
FWIW about the new include: I feel a strong dislike about the forward
declaration you suggest. Defining Relation in elog.h seems completely
On 10 July 2012 21:26, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I haven't defined Relation in elog.h; I have pre-declared it there.
Maybe that isn't to your taste, but there is surely something to be
said for adding exactly one line of code in preference to adding an
entire new header
On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Sure. You need not look further than / to find an operator name
that
absolutely *will* cause trouble if it's dumped into a filename
literally.
Shaun Thomas stho...@optionshouse.com writes:
When you re-connect a secondary device, it catches up as fast as possible by
replaying waiting transactions, and then re-attaching to the cluster. Until
it's fully caught-up, it doesn't exist. DRBD acknowledges the secondary is
there and attempting
On 07/10/2012 05:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Sure. You need not look further than / to find an operator name
that
absolutely *will* cause
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Sure. You need not look further than / to find an operator name
that
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Joel Jacobson j...@trustly.com wrote:
Hi,
I just read a very interesting post about schema version management.
Quote: You could set it up so that every developer gets their own
test database, sets up the schema there, takes a dump, and checks that
in. There
On 07/10/2012 12:50 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
I verified this behavior on head as well as 9.1 (didn't bother looking
any further back). Looks like the reason is that CreateFunction()
correctly checks lanpltrusted, whereas
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I think the ultimate question is, which ones of these should we include in
core? We cannot drop the existing range_ops opclass, if only because that
would break pg_upgrade. However, range_ops2 seems
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
FWIW about the new include: I feel a strong dislike about the forward
declaration you suggest. Defining Relation in elog.h seems completely
out of place.
Agreed. Maybe a reasonable solution is to allow some ereport helper
functions (or,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
What you explain you want reads to me Async replication + Archiving.
Notable caveat: one can't very easily measure or bound the amount of
transaction loss in any graceful way as-is. We only have unlimited
lag and
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
So far as I can see, the only LCPRVn marker code that is actually in
use right now is 0x9d --- there are no instances of 9a, 9b, or 9c
that I can find.
I also read in the xemacs internals doc, at
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:10:25PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
rsync where and how? What are you actually trying to suggest people
do?
Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch writes:
I stumbled across an initialization of a BlockNumber with InvalidBuffer,
which seems strange to me, as the values for invalid of the two types
are different, see attached patch.
That's certainly bogus ...
In case the 'stack' argument passed to that
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
Done along with comment that we follow emacs's implementation, not
xemacs's.
Well, when the preceding comment block contains five references to
xemacs and the link for more information leads to www.xemacs.org,
I don't think it's real helpful to add one
Well, when the preceding comment block contains five references to
xemacs and the link for more information leads to www.xemacs.org,
I don't think it's real helpful to add one sentence saying oh
by the way we're not actually following xemacs.
I continue to think that we'd be better off to
75 matches
Mail list logo
