I happened to notice that if you run the regression tests with
pg_stat_statements installed, you will often (not always) get
a failure that looks like this:
*** src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out Tue Jan 20 12:01:52 2015
--- src/test/regress/results/plpgsql.out Wed Jan 21 12:43:19 2015
Hi
2015-01-16 20:33 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com:
On 1/16/15 12:30 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2015-01-16 19:24 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
mailto:pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2015-01-16 19:06 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:08:34PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
7) Are we sure that the authors in the affected contrib modules are ok
with their authorship notice being removed? I don't think Ants, Bruce
or Simon have a problem with that, but ...
I am fine. It means others can be
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This isn't a back-patchable bug fix, but given the lack of prior
complaints, maybe it doesn't matter. Alternatively, we could back-patch
only the addition of escape_string_warning to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What I'm inclined to do about this is add an escape_string_warning bool
field to struct core_yy_extra_type, which would be copied from the GUC
variable by scanner_init(); then check_string_escape_warning() would
consult that
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 01:16:18PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, I find it rather annoying if people attach patchsets as
tarballs. That makes it impossible to look at them in the mailreader
since I really don't have anything reasonable to go on to teach it to
treat it as a set of
Even following Robert's disabling of abbreviated keys on Windows,
buildfarm animals hamerkop, brolga, currawong and bowerbird remain
unhappy, with failing regression tests for collate and sometimes
(but not always) aggregates. Some of these only use the C locale.
I think that aggregates does not
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/21/2015 09:27 AM, Arne Scheffer wrote:
Sorry, corrected second try because of copypaste mistakes:
VlG-Arne
Comments appreciated.
Definition var_samp = Sum of squared differences /n-1
Definition stddev_samp = sqrt(var_samp)
Example N=4
1.)
On 01/21/2015 11:21 AM, Arne Scheffer wrote:
Why is it a bad thing to call the column stddev_samp analog to the
aggregate function or make a note in the documentation, that the
sample stddev is used to compute the solution?
I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill, frankly.
Andrew Dunstan schrieb am 2015-01-21:
On 01/21/2015 11:21 AM, Arne Scheffer wrote:
Why is it a bad thing to call the column stddev_samp analog to the
aggregate function or make a note in the documentation, that the
sample stddev is used to compute the solution?
I think you are making
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay and I was also not in favour of this approach.
Okay I agree with this.
The reason why sourcefile and sourceline are not sufficient is
All,
I'm slightly mystified as to how including the word online helps
here. It's unlikely that there will be an offline_backup permission,
because if the system is off-line, SQL-level permissions are
irrelevant.
After re-reading through this thread is seems like EXCLUSIVEBACKUP
(proposed
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hello, the new app's clean looking gets my favor and the
integrated operation will do good for me:)
By the way, I got the following notice when I tried to Add
comment on the new app.
Note!: This form
Hi all
is there some agreement on this behave of ASSERT statement?
I would to assign last patch to next commitfest.
Possible changes:
* I would to simplify a behave of evaluating of message expression -
probably I disallow NULL there.
* GUC enable_asserts will be supported
* a assert exception
* Jim Nasby (jim.na...@bluetreble.com) wrote:
On 1/21/15 5:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Being startup-only won't help if the user is a superuser.
Crap, I thought postgresql.auto.conf was handled as an #include and therefore
you could still preempt it via postgresql.conf
It's not just that..
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does it happen only when parallel_seqscan_degree max_worker_processes?
I have max_worker_processes set to the default of 8
On 21-01-2015 PM 09:43, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does it happen only when parallel_seqscan_degree max_worker_processes?
I have
On 22-01-2015 PM 02:30, Amit Kapila wrote:
Perhaps you are aware or you've postponed working on it, but I see that
a plan executing in a worker does not know about instrumentation.
I have deferred it until other main parts are stabilised/reviewed. Once
that is done, we can take a call what
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com wrote:
(Please point out me if my understanding is incorrect.)
What happen if dynamic background worker process tries to reference
temporary
tables? Because buffer of temporary table blocks are allocated on private
address
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
On 21-01-2015 PM 09:43, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Magnus,
Now that I'm back on this side of the Pacific, is there any additional
data entry/cleanup which needs doing?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
The reason why sourcefile and sourceline are not sufficient
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I didn't understand the coding in GetQueryResult(); why do we check
the
result status of the last
Amit Kapila wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I didn't understand the coding in GetQueryResult(); why do we check the
result status of the last returned result only? It seems simpler to me
to check it inside the loop, but maybe
Sure, but nobody who is not a developer is going to care about that.
A typical user who sees pgstat wait timeout, or doesn't, isn't going
to be able to make anything at all out of that.
As a user, I wholeheartedly disagree.
That warning helped me massively in diagnosing an unhealthy
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Now that I'm back on this side of the Pacific, is there any additional
data entry/cleanup which needs doing?
An extra look would be worth it. Magnus or I may have missed patch
entries between the old and new apps.
My2c.
--
On 2015-01-21 22:43:03 -0500, Matt Kelly wrote:
Sure, but nobody who is not a developer is going to care about that.
A typical user who sees pgstat wait timeout, or doesn't, isn't going
to be able to make anything at all out of that.
As a user, I wholeheartedly disagree.
Note that
On 01/21/2015 07:14 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Also,
looking at the code of gist, gbt_var_same is called through
gistKeyIsEQ, which is used for an insertion or for a split. The point
is that when doing an insertion, a call to gistgetadjusted is done and
we look if one of the keys is NULL. If one
On 21-01-2015 AM 01:42, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Specifically, do we regard a partitions as pg_inherits children of its
partitioning parent?
I don't think this is totally an all-or-nothing decision. I think
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp'); wrote:
On 20-01-2015 PM 11:29, Amit Kapila wrote:
Note - I have yet to
--On 20. Januar 2015 17:15:01 +0100 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I personally think that being able to at least compile/make check old
versions a bit longer is a good idea.
+1 from me for this idea.
--
Thanks
Bernd
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Amit Langote
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
On 20-01-2015 PM 11:29, Amit Kapila wrote:
Note - I have yet to handle the new node types introduced at some
of the places and need to verify prepared queries and some other
things, however I think it will
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On
[After a discussion on IRC with Stephen…]
At 2015-01-20 21:47:02 -0500, sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Review the opening of this email though and consider that we could
look at what privileges has the audit role granted to the current
role? as defining what is to be audited.
Right, I understand
Peter == Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
Peter You'll probably prefer the attached. This patch works by
Peter disabling abbreviation, but only after writing out runs, with
Peter the final merge left to go. That way, it doesn't matter when
Peter abbreviated keys are not read back from
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 23:37 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Tom's message where he points that out is here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20707.1396372...@sss.pgh.pa.us
That message also says:
I think a patch that stood a chance of getting committed would need to
detect whether the aggregate
* Abhijit Menon-Sen (a...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
At 2015-01-20 21:47:02 -0500, sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Review the opening of this email though and consider that we could
look at what privileges has the audit role granted to the current
role? as defining what is to be audited.
Right, I
Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On 20. Januar 2015 17:15:01 +0100 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I personally think that being able to at least compile/make check old
versions a bit longer is a good idea.
+1 from me for this idea.
Already done yesterday :-)
Thanks,
--
Álvaro
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems [WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown] has possibility to wait
Peter == Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
Peter Basically, the intersection of the datum sort case with
Peter abbreviated keys seems complicated.
Not to me. To me it seems completely trivial.
Now, I follow this general principle that someone who is not doing the
work should never say
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does it happen only when parallel_seqscan_degree max_worker_processes?
I have max_worker_processes set to the default of 8 while
David G Johnston schrieb am 2015-01-21:
Andrew Dunstan wrote
On 01/20/2015 01:26 PM, Arne Scheffer wrote:
And a very minor aspect:
The term standard deviation in your code stands for
(corrected) sample standard deviation, I think,
because you devide by n-1 instead of n to keep the
I don't understand. I'm following pretty exactly the calculations
stated
at lt;http://www.johndcook.com/blog/standard_deviation/gt;
I'm not a statistician. Perhaps others who are more literate in
Maybe I'm mistaken here,
but I think, the algorithm is not that complicated.
I try to explain it
Sorry, corrected second try because of copypaste mistakes:
VlG-Arne
Comments appreciated.
Definition var_samp = Sum of squared differences /n-1
Definition stddev_samp = sqrt(var_samp)
Example N=4
1.) Sum of squared differences
1_4Sum(Xi-XM4)²
=
2.) adding nothing
1_4Sum(Xi-XM4)²
On 01/21/2015 09:27 AM, Arne Scheffer wrote:
Sorry, corrected second try because of copypaste mistakes:
VlG-Arne
Comments appreciated.
Definition var_samp = Sum of squared differences /n-1
Definition stddev_samp = sqrt(var_samp)
Example N=4
1.) Sum of squared differences
1_4Sum(Xi-XM4)²
=
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
I didn't understand the coding in GetQueryResult(); why do we check the
result status of the last returned result only? It seems simpler to me
to check it inside the loop, but maybe there's a reason you didn't do it
like that?
Also, what is the reason we were ignoring those errors only in
47 matches
Mail list logo
