Another idea here:
Instead of making COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES a compile-time option, make it a
run-time option, and make that somehow selectable while running the test
suite. It would be much easier to run the test suite with an option on
the command line, instead of having to manually edit a header
Hello Robert,
IMHO, what would be a lot more useful than something that generates
{read,equal,copy,out}funcs.c automatically would be something that
just checks them for trivial errors of omission.
Hmmm. Checking for errors is actually more complicated than generating the
function: basically
Hello Andres,
It is not done yet, but it looks that it can work in the end with limited
effort. Currently it works for copy & equal.
It'd have to do out/read as well imo.
Sure. This part is WIP, though.
Is there some interest to generate the x00kB of sources rather than edit
them everytim
>
> IMHO, what would be a lot more useful than something that generates
> {read,equal,copy,out}funcs.c automatically would be something that
> just checks them for trivial errors of omission. For example, if you
> read a list of structure members from the appropriate header files and
> cross-check
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> On 2017-03-21 07:22:57 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> I've been annoyed by these stupid functions and forgetting to update them
>>> since I run into them while trying to fix an issue in pg_stat_statement some
>>> time a
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2017-03-21 07:22:57 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> I've been annoyed by these stupid functions and forgetting to update them
>> since I run into them while trying to fix an issue in pg_stat_statement some
>> time ago.
>>
>> I've started to develop a perl script to gener
Hi,
On 2017-03-21 07:22:57 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > Add missing support for new node fields
> >
> > Commit b6fb534f added two new node fields but neglected to add copy and
> > comparison support for them, Mea culpa, should have checked for that.
>
> I've been annoyed by these stupid functio
Add missing support for new node fields
Commit b6fb534f added two new node fields but neglected to add copy and
comparison support for them, Mea culpa, should have checked for that.
I've been annoyed by these stupid functions and forgetting to update them
since I run into them while trying t
