* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
I liked the proposal here; was there a problem with it?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-
id/ca+tgmoz3ake4enctmqmzsykc_0pjl_u4c_x47ge48uy1upb...@mail.gmail.com
You're referring to the suggestion of accepting and ignoring the option on
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 07:28:03PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
I liked the proposal here; was there a problem with it?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-
id/ca+tgmoz3ake4enctmqmzsykc_0pjl_u4c_x47ge48uy1upb...@mail.gmail.com
You're
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 07:28:03PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
I liked the proposal here; was there a problem with it?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:16:45PM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:n...@leadboat.com]
Yes; the consequence of ignoring ^C is that the test postmaster would
persist indefinitely after the ^C. The system under test doesn't care per
No it won't, please see below.
* From: MauMau [mailto:maumau...@gmail.com]
From: Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net
OK, here is the first draft against current master. It builds on Windows
with VS 2012 and on FreeBSD 10 with clang 3.3. I ran the regression
tests on Windows, they all pass.
The changed behavior
From: Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net
On non-Windows platforms, the --background option is not passed, and the
option handling is unmodified except for an additional pair of braces. The
postmaster does not pass the option to its children on any platform.
pg_ctl does not pass the option
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:24:43AM +, Christian Ullrich wrote:
pg_ctl does not pass the option anywhere but on Windows, and postmaster.c
does not recognize it anywhere else. If it is encountered on a platform where
it does not make sense, it will be treated like any other (unknown) long
From: Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net
OK, here is the first draft against current master. It builds on Windows
with VS 2012 and on FreeBSD 10 with clang 3.3. I ran the regression
tests on Windows, they all pass.
The changed behavior is limited to Windows, where it now silently
ignores
OK, here is the first draft against current master. It builds on Windows
with VS 2012 and on FreeBSD 10 with clang 3.3. I ran the regression
tests on Windows, they all pass.
The changed behavior is limited to Windows, where it now silently
ignores Ctrl-C and Ctrl-Break when started via pg_ctl
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* From: Robert Haas
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
I meant creating a new one, yes. If, say, PGSQL_BACKGROUND_JOB was
set, the postmaster etc. would ignore the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
I meant creating a new one, yes. If, say, PGSQL_BACKGROUND_JOB was set,
the postmaster etc. would ignore the events.
Why not just pass a command-line switch?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
* From: Robert Haas
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
I meant creating a new one, yes. If, say, PGSQL_BACKGROUND_JOB was
set, the postmaster etc. would ignore the events.
Why not just pass a command-line switch?
Because, as I wrote in the
* From: Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:34:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
The problem can be solved this way, but the only question here is
whether it is acceptable for users to have a new console window for
server.
Can others also please share their opinion if this fix (start
* From: Amit Kapila
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* From: Amit Kapila
Do you mean to say use some existing environment variable?
Introducing an environment variable to solve this issue or infact
using some existing environ variable
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* From: Robert Haas
Why not just pass a command-line switch?
Because, as I wrote in the message you are quoting, I did not think that
having a command-line option for the sole purpose of telling the
postmaster
* From: Amit Kapila
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net
wrote:
There are some possible solutions:
- pg_ctl could set an environment variable (unless it has to be
compatible with postmasters from different versions, and it does
not, does it?).
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:34:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
The problem can be solved this way, but the only question here is whether
it is acceptable for users to have a new console window for server.
Can others also please share their opinion if this fix (start server in new
console)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* From: Amit Kapila
Do you mean to say use some existing environment variable?
Introducing an environment variable to solve this issue or infact using
some existing environ variable doesn't seem to be the best way
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:34:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
The problem can be solved this way, but the only question here is whether
it is acceptable for users to have a new console window for server.
Can others also
* From: Amit Kapila
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net
wrote:
* From: Amit Kapila
Another thing to decide about this fix is that whether it is okay to
fix it for CTRL+C and leave the problem open for CTRL+BREAK?
(The current option used
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
There are some possible solutions:
- pg_ctl could set an environment variable (unless it has to be compatible
with postmasters from different versions, and it does not, does it?).
Do you mean to say use some
* From: Amit Kapila
Another thing to decide about this fix is that whether it is okay to fix
it for CTRL+C and leave the problem open for CTRL+BREAK?
(The current option used (CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP) will handle only
CTRL+C).
I can think of three situations in which a postgres process can
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Christian Ullrich
ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* From: Amit Kapila
Another thing to decide about this fix is that whether it is okay to fix
it for CTRL+C and leave the problem open for CTRL+BREAK?
(The current option used (CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP) will handle
On 04/11/2014 01:35 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I don't think this is a complete fix, for example what about platform where
_CreateRestrictedToken()
On 2014-04-11 07:12:50 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 04/11/2014 01:35 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I don't think this is a complete fix, for
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 04/11/2014 01:35 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
I don't think this is a complete fix, for example what about platform
where
_CreateRestrictedToken() is not supported. For Example, the current
proposed fix will not work for
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
---
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
when pg_ctl start is used to run PostgreSQL in a console
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I tested the same in windows and it is working as specified.
The same background running server can be closed with ctrl+break command.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:58:58AM +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I tested the same in windows and it is working as specified.
The same
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:58:58AM +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Can someone with Windows expertise comment on whether this should be
applied?
I don't think this is a complete fix, for example what about platform where
_CreateRestrictedToken() is not supported. For Example, the current
Hello all,
when pg_ctl start is used to run PostgreSQL in a console window on
Windows, it runs in the background (it is terminated by closing the
window, but that is probably inevitable). There is one problem, however:
The first Ctrl-C in that window, no matter in which situation, will
cause
] PostgreSQL and Windows
Hi,
I would like to know if in the Windows installer
version, you still plan to use cygwin to setup
PostgreSQL ?
If no, how do you setup files and parameters ?
Moreover, What are the traps to pay attention when we
install PostgreSQL on Windows ?
tia,
X04001
Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
We have a similar question about upcoming Windows native release:
Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on
cygwin?
One connection per process. The only multithreaded Win32 is SRA's
commercial product.
--
Bruce Momjian
AM
To: Yurgis Baykshtis
Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows
Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
We have a similar question about upcoming Windows native release:
Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on
cygwin?
One connection per process
version of Postgres
in-process (that is in client's process)?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Yurgis Baykshtis
Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows
Yurgis
Hi guys,
Although the Proof of Concept build works, it does have a few drawbacks:
+ Only works on English (US at least) installations, because it's hard
coded to install in C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL. On non-English
installations, C:\Program Files is named differently and causes things
to
Justin,
can you add this to the release notes section on the sourceforge site if it's
not already there?
Robert Treat
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:02 am, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi guys,
Although the Proof of Concept build works, it does have a few drawbacks:
+ Only works on English (US at
Hi,
I would like to know if in the Windows installer
version, you still plan to use cygwin to setup
PostgreSQL ?
If no, how do you setup files and parameters ?
Moreover, What are the traps to pay attention when we
install PostgreSQL on Windows ?
tia,
X04001
__
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 22:34:04 -0700,
P.M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that PostgreSQL could help me to reduce
the cost of a such software. But i would like to know
what is the status of the PostGreSQL version under
Windows ?
I mean, i know that some of you are trying to do
Hi,
I'm new in this mailing list and in the world of
PostGreSQL.
I need to create a C++ application under Windows which
will use a very huge database...
I was thinking that PostgreSQL could help me to reduce
the cost of a such software. But i would like to know
what is the status of
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 08:03, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 22:34:04 -0700,
P.M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that PostgreSQL could help me to reduce
the cost of a such software. But i would like to know
what is the status of the PostGreSQL version under
Hi,
I'm new in this mailing list and in the world of
PostGreSQL.
I need to create a C++ application under Windows which
will use a very huge database...
I was thinking that PostgreSQL could help me to reduce
the cost of a such software. But i would like to know
what is the status of the
Hi all,
Somebody know if this version of PostgreSQL for win 32 ( ) work's under
windows 98?
And, if it work's, how do I install?
Cause when I try to connect, I receive this error message:
PSQL.EXE: could not connect to server: Socket error, no description
available. (
0x274D)
Is the server
At 07:49 24/11/00 -, Peter Mount wrote:
There's bound to be a better way, but in the NT resource kit there was a
tool you can use to make any .exe a service.
Without modifying the postmaster, this is probably the best solution. An NT
service has to handle and respond to various events
Hi:
Wonder if any of you know how to setup a postgreSQL server as a windows 2000 service
or have a URL or document on how to do it.
Thank you
--
Luis Magaña
Gnovus Networks Software
www.gnovus.com
Tel. +52 (7) 4422425
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council
-Original Message-
From: Luis =?UNKNOWN?Q?Maga=F1a?= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL
47 matches
Mail list logo
