On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 10/5/16 9:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:
>> Is the system catalog a bottleneck for people who has real use for
>> paralell vacuum? I mean, to me someone who does this must have a very
>> big db on a big iron. If that
On 10/5/16 9:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:
Is the system catalog a bottleneck for people who has real use for
paralell vacuum? I mean, to me someone who does this must have a very
big db on a big iron. If that does not consist of thousands and
thousands of smallish relations, it will normally
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> >> wrote:
> > ...
> >>> I wonder
Robert:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
> ...
>>> I wonder if the real answer isn't just to
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
...
>> I wonder if the real answer isn't just to disallow -f with parallel
>> vacuuming.
> Seems like we should figure out which catalog
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
>> wrote:
>> > After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
>> > system tables when doing
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
>> What messages are you seeing, exactly? "auto-deadlocking" isn't a thing.
>
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
> wrote:
> > After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
> > system tables when doing paralell vacuum of a full database I
> > suggested adding some flags to make vacuumdb
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
wrote:
> After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
> system tables when doing paralell vacuum of a full database I
> suggested adding some flags to make vacuumdb process schemas. I was
> asked
On 9/30/16, Francisco Olarte wrote:
> Hello everyone.
Hello, Francisco!
> Also, although I feel confident in my coding I have zero knowledge of
> developing for postgres,
It is easy enough and all important steps are documented in the wiki.
Also some interesting things
Hello everyone. I've been using the bugs/general mailing lists for a
while, but never been on hackers, so please take that into account.
After some messages due to vacuumdb auto-deadlocking itself on the
system tables when doing paralell vacuum of a full database I
suggested adding some flags to
12 matches
Mail list logo