On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
it doesn't say that is not possible to use this for a standby
server... probably that's why i get the error i put a recovery.conf
after pg_basebackup finished... maybe we can say that more loudly?
The idea is, if
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
it doesn't say that is not possible to use this for a standby
server... probably that's why i get the error i put a recovery.conf
after pg_basebackup
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
it doesn't say that is not possible to use this for a standby
server...
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Ants Aasma a...@cybertec.at wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
it
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
No, it's more a there's no reason to do that. I don't think it
should necessarily be an actual problem.
Ok, good to know.
In your case the missing piece of information is why was there a
timeline switch? pg_basebackup
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 19:39, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 14:40, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 13:46, Heikki Linnakangas
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 14:40, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 13:46, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
How does this interact with synchronous
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 16:54, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 27.10.2011
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I've applied this version with a few more minor changes that Heikki found.
Cool!
When I tried pg_receivexlog and checked the contents of streamed WAL file by
xlogdump, I found that recent WAL records that walsender has
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I've applied this version with a few more minor changes that Heikki found.
Cool!
When I tried pg_receivexlog and checked the contents of
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
I've applied this version with a few more minor changes that Heikki
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:46, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:46, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:12, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:46, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Not sure I follow. When we arrive at PQgetCopyData() there should be
nothing buffered, and if the end of stream happens there it returns
-1, and we exit, no? So where is the data that's lost?
I do realize we don't
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Not sure I follow. When we arrive at PQgetCopyData() there should be
nothing buffered, and if the end of stream happens there it returns
-1, and
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Not sure I follow. When we arrive at PQgetCopyData() there should be
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:29, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net wrote:
I'm rewriting the handling of partial files per the other thread
started by Heikki. The idea is that there will be an actual .partial
file in there when pg_receivexlog has ended,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net
wrote:
I'm rewriting the handling of partial files per the other thread
started by
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net
wrote:
I'm rewriting the handling of partial files per the other thread
started by
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
Yes. But that sounds unuserfriendly. Padding the WAL file manually
is easy-to-do for a user?
I'd definitely want
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 16:54, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 27.10.2011 14:09, Fujii Masao wrote:
Yes. But that sounds unuserfriendly. Padding the
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 13:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Perhaps we should add automatic padding in the server, though. It wouldn't
take much code in the server, and would make life easier for people writing
their
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:37, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 14:40, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 13:46, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
+ /*
+ * Looks like an
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 16:12, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
synchronous_standby_names='*' is prone to such confusion in general, but it
seems that it's particularly surprising if a running pg_basebackup
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 13:46, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
+ /*
+ * Looks like an xlog file. Parse it's position.
s/it's/its/
+ */
+ if (sscanf(dirent-d_name, %08X%08X%08X, tli, log,
seg) != 3)
+
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
synchronous_standby_names='*' is prone to such confusion in general, but it
seems that it's particularly surprising if a running pg_basebackup lets a
commit in synchronous replication to proceed. Maybe we just need a
+ /*
+* Looks like an xlog file. Parse it's position.
s/it's/its/
+*/
+ if (sscanf(dirent-d_name, %08X%08X%08X, tli, log, seg) !=
3)
+ {
+ fprintf(stderr, _(%s: could not parse xlog filename
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:55, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
pg_receivexlog worked good in my tests.
pg_basebackup with --xlog=stream gives me an already recycled wal
segment message (note that the
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Here's an updated version of pg_receivexlog, that should now actually
work (it previously failed miserably when a replication record crossed
a WAL file boundary - something which I at the time could not properly
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Here's an updated version of pg_receivexlog, that should now actually
work (it previously failed miserably when a replication record crossed
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:38, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Here's an updated version of pg_receivexlog, that should now actually
work (it previously failed miserably when a replication record crossed
a
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:30, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Here's an updated version of pg_receivexlog, that should now
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
pg_receivexlog worked good in my tests.
pg_basebackup with --xlog=stream gives me an already recycled wal
segment message (note that the file was in pg_xlog in the standby):
FATAL: could not receive data from WAL
35 matches
Mail list logo
