On lör, 2011-02-26 at 09:43 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious
> gutting of how PL/Python arguments work. If someone comes up with a
> brilliant way to solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or
> even during the 9.2 cycle (sho
> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > > > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
> >
> > > From this discussion I gather that we have a problem her
2011/2/26 Jan Urbański :
> - Original message -
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański
>> wrote:
>> > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
>
>> From this discussion
- Original message -
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański
> wrote:
> > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
> From this discussion I gather that we have a problem he
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>> Because the invocation that actually recurses sets up the scene for
>>> failure.
>>
>> That's what we're observing, but I can't figure out
On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> Because the invocation that actually recurses sets up the scene for
>> failure.
>
> That's what we're observing, but I can't figure out why it is. If you
> can, could you explain it?
>
> It act
On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> Because the invocation that actually recurses sets up the scene for
> failure.
That's what we're observing, but I can't figure out why it is. If you
can, could you explain it?
It actually makes sense to me that the arguments should be dele
- Original message -
> On mån, 2011-02-14 at 22:22 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > The problem is that every *second* call to the function fails,
> > regardless of the number. The first execution succeeds, but then
> > PLy_delete_args deletes the argument from the globals, and when the
> > n
On mån, 2011-02-14 at 22:22 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> The problem is that every *second* call to the function fails,
> regardless of the number. The first execution succeeds, but then
> PLy_delete_args deletes the argument from the globals, and when the
> next execution tries to fetch "n" from i
On 14/02/11 22:13, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 14/02/11 21:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On ons, 2011-02-09 at 10:02 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>> On 09/02/11 04:52, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
2010/12/31 Jan Urbański :
> (continuing the flurry of patches)
>
> Here's a patch that stops PL
On 14/02/11 21:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-02-09 at 10:02 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 09/02/11 04:52, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>>> 2010/12/31 Jan Urbański :
(continuing the flurry of patches)
Here's a patch that stops PL/Python from removing the function's
argum
On ons, 2011-02-09 at 10:02 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 09/02/11 04:52, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> > 2010/12/31 Jan Urbański :
> >> (continuing the flurry of patches)
> >>
> >> Here's a patch that stops PL/Python from removing the function's
> >> arguments from its globals dict after calling it. I
On 09/02/11 04:52, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2010/12/31 Jan Urbański :
>> (continuing the flurry of patches)
>>
>> Here's a patch that stops PL/Python from removing the function's
>> arguments from its globals dict after calling it. It's
>> an incremental patch on top of the plpython-refactor patch s
2010/12/31 Jan Urbański :
> (continuing the flurry of patches)
>
> Here's a patch that stops PL/Python from removing the function's
> arguments from its globals dict after calling it. It's
> an incremental patch on top of the plpython-refactor patch sent in
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-
(continuing the flurry of patches)
Here's a patch that stops PL/Python from removing the function's
arguments from its globals dict after calling it. It's
an incremental patch on top of the plpython-refactor patch sent in
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4d135170.3080...@wulczer.org.
Git
15 matches
Mail list logo
