On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I also want to reiterate that I didn't immediately call for a revert,
> initially - before recognizing the architectural issue - I offered to
> write code to address the regressions due to the spinlocks.
I was the same case --- I did
Hi,
On 2016-05-04 16:01:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> >> The PostgreSQL 9.6 release management team has determined that there
> >> is insufficient consensus at this time to revert any of the patches
> >> mentioned in
> >
On 05/04/2016 01:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Just my .02, pretty sure the majority of the community says, "TGL just sent
-1, argument over." That may or may not be a good thing but his experience
and depth of knowledge of our code base pretty
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Just my .02, pretty sure the majority of the community says, "TGL just sent
> -1, argument over." That may or may not be a good thing but his experience
> and depth of knowledge of our code base pretty much seals it for most of us.
Sure, bu
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> The PostgreSQL 9.6 release management team has determined that there
>> is insufficient consensus at this time to revert any of the patches
>> mentioned in
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYOWTtBQEL+Bv=w93bvUj
On 05/04/2016 12:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
The PostgreSQL 9.6 release management team has determined that there
is insufficient consensus at this time to revert any of the patches
mentioned in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYOWTtBQEL+Bv=w93bvUjbXSUw3uGnp+R29dduZ==
Robert Haas writes:
> The PostgreSQL 9.6 release management team has determined that there
> is insufficient consensus at this time to revert any of the patches
> mentioned in
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYOWTtBQEL+Bv=w93bvUjbXSUw3uGnp+R29dduZ==8...@mail.gmail.com
> because, with
The PostgreSQL 9.6 release management team has determined that there
is insufficient consensus at this time to revert any of the patches
mentioned in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoYOWTtBQEL+Bv=w93bvUjbXSUw3uGnp+R29dduZ==8...@mail.gmail.com
because, with the exception of "snapshot too
