On 02/06/2014 10:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 12:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
1. Try (again) to do row-security in the rewriter. This was previously
impossible because of the definition of row-security behaviour around
inheritance, but with the simplified inheritance model now
On 02/11/2014 01:16 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
It works in enough cases atm that it's worthwile trying to keep it
working. Sure, it could be better, but it's what we have right now. Atm
it's e.g. the only realistic way
On 2014-02-11 09:36, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 10:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 12:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
1. Try (again) to do row-security in the rewriter. This was previously
impossible because of the definition of row-security behaviour around
inheritance, but with
On 02/11/2014 06:05 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2014-02-11 09:36, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 10:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 12:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
1. Try (again) to do row-security in the rewriter. This was previously
impossible because of the definition of
On 2014-02-11 12:09, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/11/2014 06:05 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2014-02-11 09:36, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 10:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/06/2014 12:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
1. Try (again) to do row-security in the rewriter. This was previously
On 02/11/2014 08:19 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2014-02-11 12:09, Craig Ringer wrote:
rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v7
Hi Craig,
I compared output of psql -ef of the minirim.sql script posted earlier
in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52f54927.1040...@gmail.com
between v4 and v7.
Not
From: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
which means they manipulate the lwWaitLink queue without
protection. That's done intentionally. The code tries to protect against
corruption of the list to do a woken up backend acquiring a lock (this
or an independent one) by only continuing when the
On 2014-02-11 21:46:04 +0900, MauMau wrote:
From: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
which means they manipulate the lwWaitLink queue without
protection. That's done intentionally. The code tries to protect against
corruption of the list to do a woken up backend acquiring a lock (this
or an
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
attached you will find a new version with the following issues
resolved:
- use backend ID once again for getting the xid and xmin
- use xref instead of link in documentation
- rename fields to backend_xid and
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD tomorrow,
along with the upthread patches from Craig Ringer and Marco Atzeri.
We might as well see if this stuff is
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:55:34AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Robert, where are we on this? Should I post a patch?
I started working on this at one point but didn't finish the
implementation, let alone the no-doubt-onerous performance testing
that will be needed to validate whatever we come
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
attached you can find the next version of the patchset.
As usual, I'm going to be reviewing patch 1. The definition of patch
1 has changed quite a few times over the past year, but that's
usually the one I'm reviewing.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Bad block's page header -- this is in the 56'th relation segment:
=# select
(page_header(E'\\x2005583b05aa050028001805002004201098e00f2090e00f088d24061885e00f')).*;
lsn | tli | flags |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Right now, as I remember, only vacuum sets the visibility bits. If we
don't want to make vacuum trigger for insert-only workloads, can we set
pages all-visible more often?
Is there a reason that a sequential scan, which
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Clearly, we will need to figure out something about how to require this
module, and possibly others in the future, as we expand the tests.
Having configure check for it is not necessarily the best solution --
What is
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:57:57AM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I think there's zero overlap. They're completely complimentary features.
It's not like normal WAL records have an irrelevant volume.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:28:36AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
A sequential scan will set hint bits and will prune the page, but
pruning the page doesn't ever mark it all-visible; that logic is
entirely in vacuum. If that could be made cheap enough to be
negligible, it might well be worth doing
Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin.
At least it is not used on my build
The send in a patch. The patch you sent in previously did not totally
remove it
On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only scans in 9.2
(2012) but they still seem to be not usable for insert-only workloads
two years later. Based on current progress, it doesn't look like this
will be corrected until 9.5
Hi!
On 2014-02-11 11:22:24 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
+ * contents of records in here xexcept turning them into a more usable
Typo.
+ /*
+* XXX: There doesn't seem to be a usecase for
decoding
+* HEAP_NEWPAGE's.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:16 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
It works in enough cases atm that it's worthwile trying to keep it
working. Sure, it could be
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
(2014/02/09 8:06), Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yeah. Incidentally, we didn't quite get rid of dlltool for Cygwin. We
did get rid of dllwrap. But I agree this is worth trying for Mingw.
I tried MINGW port with the attached change and successfully built
src and
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only scans in 9.2
(2012) but they still seem to be not usable for insert-only workloads
two years later. Based on current
On 2014-02-11 13:23:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only scans in 9.2
(2012) but they still seem to be not usable for
Hi,
while testing a patch I ran valgrind over a recent checkout, and it spit
out the following:
==14792== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==14792==at 0x7F8A30: populate_record_worker (jsonfuncs.c:1459)
==14792==by 0x7F8451: json_to_record (jsonfuncs.c:1280)
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-11 13:23:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-11 12:12:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, that pretty much sums it up. We introduced index-only
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
For MSVC, here's a patch that makes gendef.pl emit DATA annotations for
global var exports.
Committed.
Also attached is a patch to make vcregress.pl produce a better error
message when there's no build output, instead of just reporting that
.. is
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
I am not saying it shouldn't be improved, I just don't see the point of
bringing it up while everyone is busy with the last CF and claiming it
is unusable and that stating that it is
On 2014-02-11 13:41:46 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Wait longer for what? Anti-xid-wraparound vacuum?
Yes.
Is using VACUUM for these cases documented? Should it be?
No idea, it seems to be part of at least part of the folkloric
knowledge, from what I see at clients.
I am not saying it
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:54:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
I am not saying it shouldn't be improved, I just don't see the point of
bringing it up while everyone is busy with the last CF and
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:28:36AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
A sequential scan will set hint bits and will prune the page, but
pruning the page doesn't ever mark it all-visible; that logic is
entirely in vacuum. If
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 03:57:31PM +1100, James Sewell wrote:
I've just noticed that on PostgreSQL 9.3 I can do the following with a master
node A and a slave node B (as long as I have set recovery_target_timeline =
'latest'):
1. Stop Node A
2. Promote Node B
3. Attach Node A as slave
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we want to track the number of inserts in statistics and trigger an
auto-vacuum after a specified number of inserts?
We track relpages and relallvisible, which seems like a more direct measure.
Once analyze is done
On 11/02/2014 18:15, Tom Lane wrote:
Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin.
At least it is not used on my build
The send in a patch. The patch you sent
While looking at the pending patch to make psql report a line count
after COPY, I came across this business in handleCopyOut():
* Check command status and return to normal libpq state. After a
* client-side error, the server will remain ready to deliver data. The
* cleanest thing
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
While looking at the pending patch to make psql report a line count
after COPY, I came across this business in handleCopyOut():
* Check command status and return to normal libpq state. After a
* client-side error, the server will remain ready
On 1/30/14, 2:42 AM, Christian Kruse wrote:
+Since Gentoo often supports different versions of a package to be
+installed you have to tell the PostgreSQL build environment where the
+Docbook DTD is located:
+programlisting
+cd /path/to/postgresql/sources/doc
+make
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I've not gotten back to it yet, but I ran into a related-seeming issue
where psql would happily chew up 2G of memory trying to send COPY
failed notices when it gets disconnected from a server that it's trying
to send data to mid-COPY. conn-sock was -1,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I've not gotten back to it yet, but I ran into a related-seeming issue
where psql would happily chew up 2G of memory trying to send COPY
failed notices when it gets disconnected from a server that it's trying
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:51:36PM -0200, Claudio Freire wrote:
We track relpages and relallvisible, which seems like a more direct measure.
Once analyze is done (which is already triggered by inserts) and sets those,
it could fire a vacuum based on the ratio of those values, or the autovac
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 02:17:12PM +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:31 PM, PostgreSQL - Hans-J rgen Sch nig
postg...@cybertec.at wrote:
i think there is one more thing which would be really good in GIN and
which
would solve a ton of issues.
atm GIN
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:52:42PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:52:25PM +0200, Karol Trzcionka wrote:
W dniu 21.08.2013 19:17, Boszormenyi Zoltan pisze:
With this fixed, a more complete review:
Thanks.
I've done some syntactic and white space cleanup, here
I wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I've not gotten back to it yet, but I ran into a related-seeming issue
where psql would happily chew up 2G of memory trying to send COPY
failed notices when it gets disconnected from a server that it's trying
to send data to mid-COPY.
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD tomorrow,
along with the upthread patches from Craig Ringer and Marco Atzeri.
We might as well see if this stuff is going to work ...
I'd love to test
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 02:17:12PM +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:31 PM, PostgreSQL - Hans-J rgen Sch nig
postg...@cybertec.at wrote:
i think there is one more thing which would be
I wrote:
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
I tried MINGW port with the attached change and successfully built
src and contrib and all pararell regression tests were OK.
I cleaned this up a bit (the if-nesting in Makefile.shlib was making
my head hurt, not to mention that it left a bunch
On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
d:\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql.920\pgsql.sln (default target) (1) -
(contrib\pg_buffercache target) -
pg_buffercache_pages.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
_MainLWLockArray
On 02/11/2014 11:04 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD tomorrow,
along with the upthread patches from Craig Ringer and Marco
On 02/12/2014 07:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -g -Wno-comment -shared -o
plperl.dll plperl.o SPI.o Util.o
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/12/2014 07:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, now that I look at this ... why are we bothering to build static
libraries (.a files) for DLLs? They have no possible use AFAICS.
I don't see any use for that with plperl, but it might be a valid thing
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've
omitted things, not silent miscompilation.
Well, before you get too optimistic about that
On 02/12/2014 08:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've
omitted things, not silent miscompilation.
On 02/11/2014 08:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/12/2014 08:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/12/2014 07:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
So the early returns from currawong are interesting:
Great, that's what I was hoping to see - proper errors where we've
I wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
I've not gotten back to it yet, but I ran into a related-seeming issue
where psql would happily chew up 2G of memory trying to send COPY
failed notices when it gets disconnected from a server that it's trying
to send data to mid-COPY.
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/11/2014 08:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw.
It sure used to:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=currawongdt=2014-02-03%2005%3A30%3A00stg=make
Hm, does the MSVC build system do
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
* I haven't introduced settings to tweak this per table for
autovacuum. I don't think those are needed.
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
I was able to reproduce this misbehavior by setting a gdb breakpoint
at pqReadData and then killing the connected server process while psql's
COPY IN was stopped there. Resetting outCount to zero in the
socket-already-gone case in pqSendSome is enough to
If you are going to change the help string for -F, you should also
update the help string for -R, and possibly for -z and -0.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 02/12/2014 09:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/11/2014 08:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw.
It sure used to:
(2014/02/12 8:30), Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
I tried MINGW port with the attached change and successfully built
src and contrib and all pararell regression tests were OK.
I cleaned this up a bit (the if-nesting in Makefile.shlib was making
my head hurt,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:57:57AM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I think there's zero overlap. They're completely complimentary features.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 11:04 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD
On Feb 12, 2014 4:09 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/12/2014 09:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/11/2014 08:04 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Looks like currawong doesn't build postgres_fdw.
It sure used to:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
Hello,
Because of time pressure in the commit-fest:Jan, I tried to simplifies the
patch
for cache-only scan into three portions; (1) add a hook on heap_page_prune
for cache invalidation on vacuuming a particular page.
(2014/02/12 3:03), Tom Lane wrote:
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
(2014/02/09 8:06), Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yeah. Incidentally, we didn't quite get rid of dlltool for Cygwin. We
did get rid of dllwrap. But I agree this is worth trying for Mingw.
I tried MINGW port with the attached
Hi Rajeev,
(2014/01/29 17:31), Rajeev rastogi wrote:
No Issue, you can share me the test cases, I will take the performance report.
Attached patch is supported to latest pg_stat_statements. It includes min, max,
and stdev statistics. Could you run compiling test on your windows enviroments?
I
66 matches
Mail list logo
