Tom Lane wrote:
I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
initdb and pg_control will report (for example) English_United
Kingdom.1252
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
initdb and
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it doesn't
supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten in C.
I would think things like ts_debug (and ts_stat?) which are handy support
modules but not fundamentally part of the
2007/10/22, Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it doesn't
supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten in C.
I would think things like ts_debug (and ts_stat?) which are handy
On 10/21/07, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
known issues and changes with Beta1
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:25:03AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
not support).
I'm not against stripping the .1252
Le lundi 22 octobre 2007, Robert Treat a écrit :
There was talk that the txid contrib module could be folded into core
should we do an initdb post beta; has that idea been revisted now that we
have?
It very well seem to have been integrated into core:
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
not support).
I'm not against
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
WIN1252 database...
Will chklocale.c actually allow that? Should it? We've spent a lot of
time zeroed in
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:55:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
WIN1252 database...
Will chklocale.c
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:07:06 +0100
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it
doesn't supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten
in C.
I would think things like
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not going to have as many beta
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
known issues and changes with Beta1 that have made it pretty much a
useless Beta.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
either fix those or
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
either fix those or decide
- --On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
either fix those or decide we're not going to fix them. I'm a
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not going to have as many beta bugs.
--
Bruce
A Diumenge 21 Octubre 2007, Bruce Momjian va escriure:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not going to
Are we ready to think about a beta2? Seems beta1 was quiet.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In
26 matches
Mail list logo
