On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:07:06 +0100
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Oleg Bartunov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it
> > doesn't supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten
> > in C.
>
> I would think thi
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:55:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
> > wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
> > WIN1252 database...
>
> Will chklocal
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
> wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
> WIN1252 database...
Will chklocale.c actually allow that? Should it? We've spent a lot of
time zeroed
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
> >>> leaving it as is, where I'd
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
>>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
>>> not support).
>
>> I'
Le lundi 22 octobre 2007, Robert Treat a écrit :
> There was talk that the txid contrib module could be folded into core
> should we do an initdb post beta; has that idea been revisted now that we
> have?
It very well seem to have been integrated into core:
http://repo.or.cz/w/PostgreSQL.git?a=co
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
>> not support).
> I'm not against stripping t
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:25:03AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
> > >
> > > Getting Beta2 out is vi
On Sunday 21 October 2007 22:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
> >
> > Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
> > known issues and chan
On 10/21/07, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
> > beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
> > in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
2007/10/22, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Oleg Bartunov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it doesn't
> > supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten in C.
>
> I would think things like ts_debug (and ts_stat?) whi
"Oleg Bartunov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ts_debug is a really debug function and could be changed. Btw, it doesn't
> supports thesaurus dictionaries, so it should be rewritten in C.
I would think things like ts_debug (and ts_stat?) which are handy support
modules but not fundamentally part o
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
> > locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
>
> I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
> initdb and
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm also not totally clear on whether we are happy with the Windows
> locale situation yet. Comments from the Win32 contingent?
I'm happy that UTF-8 support is now working again, but not happy that
initdb and pg_control will report (for example) "English_United
Kingdom.1252" des
>
> - --On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
> > minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
> > either fix those or decide we're not going to fix them
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
>> minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
>> either fix those o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, October 21, 2007 22:38:04 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've posted notes over the past few days about half a dozen relatively-
> minor-but-none-the-less-initdb-forcing issues in tsearch. We have to
> either fix those o
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Nothing motivates people to test more than moving toward RC1. ;-)
> Getting Beta2 out is vital to actually getting people to test there are
> known issues and changes with Beta1 that have made it pretty much a
> useless Bet
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
> > beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
> > in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
> > freeze it is possible we are
Bruce Momjian wrote:
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not going to have as many beta bug
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
> beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
> in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
> freeze it is possible we are not goi
A Diumenge 21 Octubre 2007, Bruce Momjian va escriure:
> We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
> beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
> in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
> freeze it is possible w
We have had very few beta1 issues. I am thinking we should release
beta2 next week and perhaps accelerate beta and consider a final release
in November rather than December. Because of the length of our feature
freeze it is possible we are not going to have as many beta bugs.
--
Bruce Momjian
Are we ready to think about a beta2? Seems beta1 was quiet.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In ver
26 matches
Mail list logo
