Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I would just fix it in head.
That just seems weird. Either it's cheap enough not to matter (in
which case there's no reason to revert that change at all) or it's
expensive enough
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was defined in the following commit:
On 07.10.2011 12:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging
symbols. The ability to get a useful stack trace
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO, --enable-debug should not do
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas
10 matches
Mail list logo
