Thomas Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not a big fan of the trend to fork off a mailing list anytime more
than a few messages on a single topic come through. The synergy and
cross-pollination that we get by having us all see various topics wrt
development far outweigh the minor
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
The delete key is your friend. So is procmail, if you just can't stand
to see the letters "R", "P", and "M" too close together ;)
I'm not a big fan of the
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
IIRC, this question was asked about 6 months ago, and the answer was RPM
should be discussed on PostgreSQL-Ports.
On the other hand, it seems in practice most people are unaware of
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
I believe that there is no room for -ffast-math in PostgreSQL. The
I have placed code in the spec to strip out ffast-math from the CFLAGS.
I have not as yet followed Peter's advice on exporting CFLAGS and
leaving COPT -- but that's not to say that I won't.
While I
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the past I have found that kaffe did not handle enough java code for
my needs, but that was not for the JDBC driver. I am currently using
jikes for my projects, and it produces *nice* code in my experience.
Jikes is open source, right? I know it
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your
If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
Win camp could be seperated also ...
pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
as far as newsgroups are concerned, they would both fall under ports:
comp.databases.postgresql.ports.linux.rpm
comp.databases.postgresql.ports.windows
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
Win camp could be seperated also ...
pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
as far as newsgroups are concerned, they would both fall under ports:
If that's what you want to do. Although, I'd
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
Win camp could be seperated also ...
pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
A windows list seems like a good idea. But I'm not sure that a separate
list for RPMs is a good idea. In
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
Win camp could be seperated also ...
pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
A windows list seems like a good idea. But I'm not sure that a
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time especially
because yours truly messed up the whole build system that the packagers
were so careful to work around. I
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time especially
because yours truly messed up the whole build system that the packagers
were so careful to work
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time
especially because yours truly messed up the whole build system that
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
Yes, that's probably better than pgsql-windows ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if
The Hermit Hacker writes:
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
We have pgsql-ports, which isn't seeing too much traffic as it is. Seems
like the cygwin people hang out there anyway.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do we need to start thinking about an RPM mailing list? Seems there is
lots of traffic.
The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time
especially
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The Hermit Hacker writes:
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
We have pgsql-ports, which isn't seeing too much traffic as it is. Seems
like the cygwin people hang out there anyway.
Ya, well, there is alot of
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
Yes, that's probably better than pgsql-windows ...
Done ...
---(end of broadcast)---
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like Lamar's suggestion of pgsql-cygwin though ... sound reasonable?
Yes, that's probably better than pgsql-windows ...
But then again, the comment this is more properly done on ports makes
sense.
--
Bruce Momjian|
The Hermit Hacker writes:
If someone wants to come up with an idea for name, i think that the whole
Win camp could be seperated also ...
pgsql-windows and pgsql-rpm ?
There seem to be a lot of Linux users, too. How about a new mailing list?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The traffic naturally peaks around release time, and this time especially
because yours truly messed up the whole build system that the packagers
were so careful to work around.
Now, Peter. The build, IMHO, is much better than before -- if anything,
the fact that we
In the past I have found that kaffe did not handle enough java code for
my needs, but that was not for the JDBC driver. I am currently using
jikes for my projects, and it produces *nice* code in my experience.
Jikes is open source, right? I know it is available for Red Hat (ships
with it
Lamar Owen writes:
In the postgresql-docs subpackage, along with the SGML source.
Why would you want to ship the source?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lamar Owen writes:
In the postgresql-docs subpackage, along with the SGML source.
Why would you want to ship the source?
For those with SGML tools and viewers, who might like to build hardcopy of
their own. Frankly, it was an easy thing to do;
24 matches
Mail list logo
