Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-25 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Gavin Flower wrote: > On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: > [...] >> >> And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: >> Committed: 30. >> Moved to next CF: 42. >> Rejected: 9. >> Returned with Feedback: 22. >> Total: 103.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-25 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:45:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Gavin Flower
On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: [...] And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Regards, You didn't say how may regards... [More seriously] Many thanks to you, and the other Postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 12/24/2015 04:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paquier writes: And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > > Committed: 30. > > Moved to next CF: 42. > > Rejected: 9. > > Returned with Feedback: 22. > > Total: 103. > > Many

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >>> OK, if those don't get

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > Committed: 30. > Moved to next CF: 42. > Rejected: 9. > Returned with Feedback: 22. > Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work this time!

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next >> CF with the same status. > > After a first pass,

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next > CF with the same status. After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to continue: Needs review: 13. Waiting on

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. Those are: : SQL function to report log message AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it. It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's

[HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, As of today, at the moment I am writing this message, here is the commit fest app status: Needs review: 20. Waiting on Author: 24. Ready for Committer: 4. Committed: 29. Moved to next CF: 11. Rejected: 8. Returned with Feedback: 7. Total: 103. This means in short that 48 out of 103

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. > > Those are: > > : SQL function to report log message > > AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-03 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 1.3.2014 18:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the previous

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote: On 1.3.2014 18:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to

[HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the previous few commit fests. So decent job so far. Which

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-01 Thread Josh Berkus
On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-01 Thread Vik Fearing
On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote: On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8,

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

2014-03-01 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote: On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-15 Thread Decibel!
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: In short, I think it's time to declare our first commit fest done. OK, todo updated, but what about the Maintaining cluster order on insert idea? http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

[HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
What's left on Bruce's patch queue page is: * Finishing out Heikki's patch to allow runtime determination of the need to recheck an index condition. What's committed so far doesn't yet have any actual use :-(. Although I intend to keep working on that, it's clearly new development and hence not

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: What's left on Bruce's patch queue page is: * Finishing out Heikki's patch to allow runtime determination of the need to recheck an index condition. What's committed so far doesn't yet have any actual use :-(. Although I intend to keep working on that, it's clearly new

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: In short, I think it's time to declare our first commit fest done. OK, todo updated, but what about the Maintaining cluster order on insert idea? http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches The last item I see in the thread is some

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: In short, I think it's time to declare our first commit fest done. OK, todo updated, but what about the Maintaining cluster order on insert idea? http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches The last item I see in

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-04-11 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: In short, I think it's time to declare our first commit fest done. Congratulations! As a pure observer in the matter, it has clearly been a somewhat painful process, which must be tempered by the consideration that what was being reviewed was pretty much a

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-31 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, it's the end of March, and I'm already starting to feel like we've been commit-festing forever :-(. At this point I see only one remaining patch that seems likely to go in without any further discussion --- that's Pavel's plpgsql EXECUTE USING thing.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, we've got boatloads of stuff that needs discussion and consensus-achievement. Please take a look at the queue http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches Alvaro tried to dump this list into:

[HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-30 Thread Tom Lane
Well, it's the end of March, and I'm already starting to feel like we've been commit-festing forever :-(. At this point I see only one remaining patch that seems likely to go in without any further discussion --- that's Pavel's plpgsql EXECUTE USING thing. However, we've got boatloads of stuff

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-27 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 17:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: FYI, we started the commit fest with 2k emails. We now have 787 emails left to process, and many are done but waiting for me to add TODO items or just delete them. Just finished reviewing the remaining items on the queue that I can

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 17:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: FYI, we started the commit fest with 2k emails. We now have 787 emails left to process, and many are done but waiting for me to add TODO items or just delete them. Just finished reviewing the remaining items on

[HACKERS] Commit fest status

2008-03-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
FYI, we started the commit fest with 2k emails. We now have 787 emails left to process, and many are done but waiting for me to add TODO items or just delete them. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB