On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
You might be, I'm not ... when we finally release v7.3, it will be *as
solid* as our previous releases ...
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
You might be, I'm not ... when we finally release v7.3, it will be *as
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
You might be, I'm not ...
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
well, right now, we are waiting for an updated 'supported platforms' list
due to having to put out beta5 :(
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
well, right now, we are waiting for an updated 'supported platforms' list
due to having to put out
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
well, right now, we are waiting for an updated
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
well, right now, we
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tom, do you have as much confidence in your changes as bruce? if so, why
didn't we just go to RC1, instead of a beta?
It's not really do I think these changes are risky? --- it's more
do I think we're done yet? To me, an RC label means we think this
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
News to me ...
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are we still on schedule for RC1 on Friday?
I am asking. We almost got to RC1 last Friday, so I figured we could do
RC1 this Friday. The changes between
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was
also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct? What impact does
that have? For instance, could it cause one of the regression tests to
fail, or is it something that is
Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was
also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct? What impact does
that have? For instance, could it cause one of the regression tests to
fail, or is
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
hold up release to support some obscure platform.
As long as the docs are unfinished, I don't feel any particular
compunction about not applying portability fixes.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
hold up release to support some obscure platform.
As long as the docs are unfinished, I don't feel any particular
compunction about not applying portability fixes. If you want RC1
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was
also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct? What impact does
that have? For instance, could it cause one of the regression
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
You might be, I'm not ... when we finally release v7.3, it will be *as
solid* as our previous releases ... *shrug*
---(end of
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
hold up release to support some obscure platform.
As long as the docs are unfinished, I don't feel any particular
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not
You might be, I'm not ... when we finally release v7.3, it will be *as
solid* as our previous releases ... *shrug*
All I am saying is that I would like to
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 13:44:11 -0400,
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't noticed any 'drag' so far this release ... we had a long beta
between 2 and 3, but 3-4 and 4-5 have been really short (so short that 4
didn't exist) ...
I managed to be running beta 4 for a day. At
News to me ...
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are we still on schedule for RC1 on Friday?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
News to me ...
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are we still on schedule for RC1 on Friday?
I am asking. We almost got to RC1 last Friday, so I figured we could do
RC1 this Friday. The changes between betas is minimal.
--
Bruce Momjian
Are we still on schedule for RC1 on Friday?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
22 matches
Mail list logo
