On 10/04/2011 03:45 PM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
I think I get this stats stuff now. Unless someone here thinks it's
too hard for a new postgres dev's 2nd patch, I could take a stab. I
might take a look at it tonight to get a feel for how hard, and what
stats we could collect. I'll start a new
On 04.10.2011 22:46, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC) wrote:
Our team drives the bug notification activity with our valued Windows partners.
This email is to notify you that PostgreSQL's application/driver experienced
compatibility issue(s) during internal Microsoft testing and has been
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 23:46, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 4 October 2011 22:57, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 03:09, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 4 October 2011 14:04, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com
On 09/26/2011 05:58 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
* Local variables added by the patch (secs, usecs, write_rate and
endtime) can be moved into narrower scope.
* Initializing starttime to zero seems unnecessary.
Setting starttime to 0 is already in the code; the change made to that
line was to
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 00:30, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 23:46, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
You mean the final changes in plperl_helpers.h would look like
something like this right? :
static inline char *
utf_u2e(const char
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net wrote:
Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments:
...
Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my
laptop but I'll setup a more real world environment to test for
On 09/29/2011 10:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I reviewed this patch. My question for you is: does it make sense to
enable to reporting of write rate even when vacuum cost accounting is
enabled? In my opinion it would be useful to do so. If you agree,
please submit an updated patch.
On 04.10.2011 15:10, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Ok. Could you phrase that as a code comment?
Here's a version of the patch I've been working on. There's no functional
changes, just a lot of moving
On 5 October 2011 12:29, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 00:30, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 23:46, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
You mean the final changes in plperl_helpers.h would look like
something
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 04.10.2011 15:10, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakangas@**enterprisedb.comheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com
wrote:
Ok. Could you
On tis, 2011-10-04 at 17:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Greg Stark wrote:
An interactive tool can dwim automatically but that isn't appropriate
for a startup script. A startupt script should always do the same
thing exactly and do that based on the OS
On mån, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Why were people not using pg_ctl?
Actually, a slight correction/addition here: The Debian init script does
use pg_ctl to start the service. Seems to work fine.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
Thanks for your reviewing.
2011/10/4 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I rebased the patches towards the latest git master, so I believe these
are available to apply.
Reviewing away...
I don't see why we need one
Hi there,
Just to let you know, I'm not a database expert by any means.
I have configured dbt-2 with postgres and created a database with 4000
warehouses,
150 customers etc. The database size is over 8G. I am aware that lock contention
can be checked with lockstat (and with pg_locks ? ) but I
In addition to the previous post,
My postgres version is 8.3.7
Hi there,
Just to let you know, I'm not a database expert by any means.
I have configured dbt-2 with postgres and created a database with 4000
warehouses,
150 customers etc. The database size is over 8G. I am aware that lock
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié oct 05 04:02:12 -0300 2011:
On 09/29/2011 10:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I reviewed this patch. My question for you is: does it make sense to
enable to reporting of write rate even when vacuum cost accounting is
enabled? In my opinion it would
Path without allocating extra bytes is attached.
I run some more detailed tests on geonames and two smaller datasets from
rtreeportal.org.
Test tables are following:
1) test1 - geonames
2) test2 - California Roads, containing the MBRs of 2,249,727 streets
3) test3 - Tiger Streams, containing the
When walsender calls out to do_pg_stop_backup() (during base backups),
it is not possible to terminate the process with a SIGTERM - it
requires a SIGKILL. This can leave unkillable backends for example if
archive_mode is on and archive_command is failing (or not set). A
similar thing would happen
Hackers,
Have been following with some interest the dialog recently about getting
pl/python built within the v9 tree; most recently, I've been trying v9.1.1
(git) and python 3.2.2. Configure and make complete without error, but 'make
install' does not produce any plpython.so
I have since
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Royce Ausburn royce...@inomial.com wrote:
I'm not sure what my next step should be. I've added this patch to the open
commit fest -- is that all for now until the commit fest begins review?
Yep, except that it might be nice if you could volunteer to review
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 04.10.2011 22:46, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC) wrote:
Our team drives the bug notification activity with our valued Windows
partners. This email is to notify you that PostgreSQL's
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 04.10.2011 22:46, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC) wrote:
Our team drives the bug notification activity with our
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
I agree that if we wanted to farm out entire plan nodes we would
probably end up generating new partial plans which would be handed to
other backend processes. That's not unlike what Oracle did with
Parallel Query. But i'm a bit
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 04.10.2011 22:46, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC)
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
The get_relation_address() follows the logic in RemoveRelations() to be
eliminated by this patch, so it is not a code duplication.
The reason why we didn't consolidate this routine with get_object_address()
was that
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
That seems strange, since the MSFT guy is reporting that whatever he
tested did work on Windows 7, but now that you've pointed out that
Windows 8 won't be released until after we stop supporting 8.2, I am
filled with
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I still think this is a matter for HEAD only. We haven't supported
these cases in back branches and so there is little argument for
back-patching.
According to Bruce's original post, there is at least one 9.1
regression here
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
That seems strange, since the MSFT guy is reporting that whatever he
tested did work on Windows 7, but now that you've pointed out that
Windows 8 won't
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I have no more issues with the patch.
Thanks!
I think this patch needs to be added to the open CommitFest, with
links to the reviews, and marked Ready for Committer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
On 05/10/11 15:24, Lou Picciano wrote:
Hackers,
Have been following with some interest the dialog recently about getting
pl/python built within the v9 tree; most recently, I've been trying v9.1.1
(git) and python 3.2.2. Configure and make complete without error, but 'make
install' does
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
As of fairly recently, the Fedora package also uses pg_ctl for both
starting and stopping. We've fixed all the reasons that formerly
existed to avoid use of pg_ctl, and it's a real PITA to try to
implement the
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Why were people not using pg_ctl?
Actually, a slight correction/addition here: The Debian init script does
use pg_ctl to start the service. Seems to work fine.
Yes. The script authors discovered a working
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2011-10-04 at 17:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
As of fairly recently, the Fedora package also uses pg_ctl for both
starting and stopping. We've fixed all the reasons that formerly
existed to avoid use of pg_ctl, and it's a real PITA to try to
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I still think this is a matter for HEAD only. ?We haven't supported
these cases in back branches and so there is little argument for
back-patching.
According to Bruce's original post, there is at least
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, here is a patch that adds a -C option to the postmaster so any
config variable can be dumped, even while the server is running (there
is no security check because we don't
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, here is a patch that adds a -C option to the postmaster so any
config variable can be dumped, even while the server is running (there
is no
Robert Haas wrote:
Markus Wanner took a crack at generalizing the autovacuum machinery
that we have now into something that could be used to fire up
general-purpose worker processes, but it fell down mostly because I
(and, I think, others) weren't convinced that imessages were something
we
Hamza Bin Sohail hsoh...@purdue.edu wrote:
My postgres version is 8.3.7
Why such an old version? Why exclude the available bug fixes?
http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
I am aware that lock contention can be checked with lockstat (and
with pg_locks ? ) but I wanted to know if
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Hamza Bin Sohail hsoh...@purdue.edu wrote:
My postgres version is 8.3.7
Why such an old version? Why exclude the available bug fixes?
http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
I am aware that lock
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
* The logic of check_object_validation() got included within
get_relation_address(), and rewritten more smartly, as:
+ relkind = RelationGetForm(relation)-relkind;
+ if ((objtype == OBJECT_INDEX relkind !=
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun sep 26 13:16:24 -0300 2011:
So I had to look for something else -- and I think I have it: have
multixact itself track its truncation position relative to Xid. Each
pg_multixact/offset segment would store ReadNewTransactionId at the
time it is
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC)
v-sei...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hello all,
Thank you for all your responses to my inquiry.
We are aware that this application version 8.2.x is pretty old and
PostgreSQL will stop releasing updates for the 8.2.X in December
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC)
v-sei...@microsoft.com wrote:
Would this download site be a good URL for that?
*http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgdownload*http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgdownload
No,
Hi! *Waves*
First off, it all seems to work as described:
- regressions pass
- domains work
- tried various inherit options (merging constraints, alter table no
inherit etc)
- pg_dump/restore
I didn't care for the changes to gram.y so I reworked it a bit so we
now pass is_only to
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 08:18, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I have no more issues with the patch.
Thanks!
I think this patch needs to be added to the open CommitFest, with
links to the reviews,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:44:38AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Why were people not using pg_ctl?
Actually, a slight correction/addition here: The Debian init script does
use pg_ctl to start the service.
tldr:
Seems to be broken by
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=4da99ea4231e3d8bbf28b666748c1028e7b7d665
:
commit 4da99ea4231e3d8bbf28b666748c1028e7b7d665
Author: Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org
Date: Mon Jun 27 10:27:17 2011 -0400
Avoid having two copies of the
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 02:36, gabrielle gor...@gmail.com wrote:
This review was compiled from a PDXPUG group review (Dan Colish, Mark
Wong, Brent Dombrowski, and Gabrielle Roth).
Whaat, you marked the patch as Returned with Feedback based on this review?
The only obvious change I need to make
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:44:38AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Why were people not using pg_ctl?
Actually, a slight correction/addition here:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:20:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:44:38AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 15:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Why were people
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
With the patch I am going to commit, you will not need to use one of the
-D flags because pg_ctl will find the data directory location; you will
just specify the config-only directory with one -D, and the
--data-directory.
So, you're saying that my passing
Hi,
My apologies for the last grumpy message I wrote; I sent it out of
surprise that my patch was marked closed on the current commitfest.
I hope I haven't discouraged you from reviewing this updated version.
I think you intended to use the Waiting on Author status -- that
leaves the commitfest
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:59:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
With the patch I am going to commit, you will not need to use one of the
-D flags because pg_ctl will find the data directory location; you will
just specify the config-only directory with one -D,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
When walsender calls out to do_pg_stop_backup() (during base backups),
it is not possible to terminate the process with a SIGTERM - it
requires a SIGKILL. This can leave unkillable backends for example if
archive_mode
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
tldr:
Seems to be broken by
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=4da99ea4231e3d8bbf28b666748c1028e7b7d665
:
commit 4da99ea4231e3d8bbf28b666748c1028e7b7d665
Author: Robert Haas
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 08:18, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I have no more issues with the patch.
Thanks!
I think this
56 matches
Mail list logo
