I see you just submitted the patch so we will address it after the
commit fest --- thanks.
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> done
>
> http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/Iter%C3%A1tor_pole
>
> I'll send patch later
>
> Pavel
>
> 2007
done
http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/Iter%C3%A1tor_pole
I'll send patch later
Pavel
2007/10/18, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On
On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On the question of being too long, I could live with
> >> generate_subscripts().
>
> > how about array_iota?
>
> I think a lot of people wouldn't
Tom Lane wrote:
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
generate_array_subscripts() maybe?
array_to_set or array_expand seem a little better imo (shorter, and
symmetry with array_accum()), unless you want to differentiate between
internal
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On the question of being too long, I could live with
>> generate_subscripts().
> how about array_iota?
I think a lot of people wouldn't get the reference. How about
array_subscripts()?
On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't much like either of those, because they seem misleading:
> what I'd expect from a function named that way is that it returns
> the *elements* of the array, not their subscripts.
>
> Come to think of it, do we have a way of doing that direct
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> generate_array_subscripts() maybe?
> array_to_set or array_expand seem a little better imo (shorter, and
> symmetry with array_accum()), unless you want to differentiate between
> internal funcs (arr
On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google:
> > array_to_set). I think I like those names better since you are
> > returning a set, not an iterator :-).
>
> I agree, this is a ver
2007/10/18, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google:
> > array_to_set). I think I like those names better since you are
> > returning a set, not an iterator :-).
>
> I agree, this is a very poor
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google:
> array_to_set). I think I like those names better since you are
> returning a set, not an iterator :-).
I agree, this is a very poor choice of name. There should be some
reference to ar
2007/10/18, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/18/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this function can help with array's iteration.
> >
> > create function generate_iterator(anyarray)
> > returns setof integer
> > as $$
> > select i
> > from generate_series(array_lower($1,1
2007/10/18, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/18/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this function can help with array's iteration.
> >
> > create function generate_iterator(anyarray)
> > returns setof integer
> > as $$
> > select i
> > from generate_series(array_lower($1,1
On 10/18/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this function can help with array's iteration.
>
> create function generate_iterator(anyarray)
> returns setof integer
> as $$
> select i
> from generate_series(array_lower($1,1),
>array_upper($1,1)) g
Hello
this function can help with array's iteration.
create function generate_iterator(anyarray)
returns setof integer
as $$
select i
from generate_series(array_lower($1,1),
array_upper($1,1)) g(i)
$$ language sql;
-- multidimensional
create function gene
14 matches
Mail list logo
